Is "fandom" an accurate term anymore?
15 years ago
I have a hypothesis: the vast majority of furries identify enough with their characters and/or the furry community to be considered "lifestylers" as opposed to just "furry fans."
Maybe this is just because all of my close friends seem to act this way, but I have a feeling that "furry fandom" is, nowadays, a complete misnomer. "Culture" or "subculture" seems like it fits better, at least from my observations. Even though that's a bit overly broad; I'm not sure the proper term for what furry is has been coined yet, but that's something I won't get into right now.
For the moment, I'm wondering: how many furries reading this do not consider furry to be anything more than something that they are a "fan" of, i.e., don't consider anything beyond enjoying the art and literature to be an integral part of their identity? I don't think the majority would say yes to say, but I'd like to test that assumption.
Maybe this is just because all of my close friends seem to act this way, but I have a feeling that "furry fandom" is, nowadays, a complete misnomer. "Culture" or "subculture" seems like it fits better, at least from my observations. Even though that's a bit overly broad; I'm not sure the proper term for what furry is has been coined yet, but that's something I won't get into right now.
For the moment, I'm wondering: how many furries reading this do not consider furry to be anything more than something that they are a "fan" of, i.e., don't consider anything beyond enjoying the art and literature to be an integral part of their identity? I don't think the majority would say yes to say, but I'd like to test that assumption.
A fandom can only act in reaction to something outside of its direct control.
We're our own bosses.
The inmates run this asylum, baby!
Also consider the huge number of subcultures AMONG furries (Lycans/therians, gamer furs, otaku furs, and furs into every fetish community there is).
Maybe "metaverse" is a better name to describe furry. :-P