FA+
Shop
No Subject
18 years ago
Apparently, FurAffinity administrators now have the right to declare licenses on other documents invalid. My right to distribute a derived work is not being respected on this site:
That still doesn't mean that it is permitted on FA. FA follows its own rules, I mean we do abide but the US laws per se, but if we say certain content is not permitted on FA. It isn't allowed reguardless of other legal terms. You may have the right to modify and post that image; but that doesn't mean you can on FA. We don't have to allow it to be posted; we have that right. We can allow or reject what content we wish. Thats the entire point. I'm sure your legal representative would see that.
So, although I'm allowed to create and distribute a derivative work according to the license of the documents I am deriving from, I'm not allowed to do it on FA?
What gives FurAffinity the right to state that the GFDL and the CC-SA are suddenly invalid, then?
That still doesn't mean that it is permitted on FA. FA follows its own rules, I mean we do abide but the US laws per se, but if we say certain content is not permitted on FA. It isn't allowed reguardless of other legal terms. You may have the right to modify and post that image; but that doesn't mean you can on FA. We don't have to allow it to be posted; we have that right. We can allow or reject what content we wish. Thats the entire point. I'm sure your legal representative would see that.
So, although I'm allowed to create and distribute a derivative work according to the license of the documents I am deriving from, I'm not allowed to do it on FA?
What gives FurAffinity the right to state that the GFDL and the CC-SA are suddenly invalid, then?
:(
I've come to expect this kind of bullshit from FA. The site's slogan used to be "where freedom of expression reigns". It's more like "where freedom fails".