there's so much cub art on FA.. THEY dont get deleted so why should fanart of Hiccup get deleted? O.o Makes no since.. kinda hypocritical dontcha think?
Yes, it is pretty hypocritical - it would make a lot more sense if it was an "all or none" policy. But cartoon Human porn is considered a variation on child pornography, so it's definitely out. But, as far as I know, no one's ever tested whether or not "cub" art is considered CP in court. I believe FA considers there to be enough of a "gray area" there that cub art is still allowed... at least until some judge rules otherwise.
its a cartoon, not based off a REAL human... so it's still fantasy.. so.. is cub art.. i think they should all be thrown in the pot together and erased forever lol even though its not a human.. its an UNDERAGED fur... its still the fantasy of being with someone underage and prepubescent or however you spell it and i consider it as bad. They are just slapping on ears and a tail so they can have a reason to draw and oogle child porn "legally" =/
Awesome. It was obvious to me from the start, but it's great to have actual proof. Now this info needs to be posted with every Toothcup work, so the admins can't come up with any excuse to delete it. If they wanna take it down now, they'll have to start banning humans from FA altogether.
Shouldn't matter anyways. It's legal to draw these things, in the U.S. at least, where I assume this site is based. The only thing that matters is the admins' discrimination towards furry/human content and what other prejudices they may have towards shota.
Hiding behind this law they made up is a little weak. I say just let people express themselves.
D:< Aww friggen geezer! RUINS IT! NOt for real real, just for play play. Also I just got that on DVD today too. owo 'salright. They could have just had toothless being cute for the entire run time though and I'da loved it just the same.
since administration decided to delete my comment for a reason that was not brought to my attention, I'll say again I apologize for being wrong. Figured the movie would have followed the book, which I hope is understandable since Hiccup looks like he's 14.
Let's count: Hiccup, Astrid, Ruffnut and Tuffnut, plus the other two plus 5 dragons including Toothless makes 10, so all that would be needed are four more riders and dragons and a plot. OCs, anyone?
I'm 24 and I still get asked if I'm old enough to work when I go to job interviews. An 18 year old looking severely younger than their age is not unheard of...hell, half of the twink porn industry is based on 18 year olds looking 14.
Also consider that poor nutrition slows down physical maturity, and food would have been scarce in that area if we assume realistic conditions. Technically, Hiccup looks more realistic than the bigger vikings.
Whatever his age is, it doesn't matter. In the United States there is something known as "Freedom of Expression." That defends any drawn art, and whether that includes shota or not doesn't matter.
To suggest that drawing a stick figure with a penis and labeling it "underage" to be the same thing as real child pornography is just as ridiculous as if someone compared a picture of a fight to assault, or comparing the picture of a killing to murder, and demanded legal action towards the content and it's creator and viewers.
It's absurd, the court system KNOWS THIS and DEFENDS our write to draw and express ourselves freely... For now. If anything changes, I'd be sorely disappointed, because I probably shouldn't go to jail for genocide if I choose to read the Iliad, or get a speeding ticket if I watch James Bond in a car chase. But for now, treat yourself to some Toothcup and ignore me, the politico. Draw away! ^_^
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Learn More
I wish I can one day be involved in such a fantastic field of work with other creative minds to collaborate with.
Go me.
Woohoo for official proof of his age!
I support this journal though. I agree entirely.
Let the Toothcup continue!
:x
Thank you very much for recording.
Not to mention it's THE Hiccup, and not like, 3 winged 4 tailed Joe some guy invented. So I guess that might weight in as well.
I just think the whole law against this is stupid though. I'm not necessarily a fan of it, but it doesn't make sense one way or another.
Peace.
Hiding behind this law they made up is a little weak. I say just let people express themselves.
I don't know I'm so baked right now.
*delete* *delete* *delete* *delete* *delete* *delete* *delete* *delete* *delete*
this extra is on the DVD or the Bluray?
I so want that movie sadly it got delayed for my region
:>
To suggest that drawing a stick figure with a penis and labeling it "underage" to be the same thing as real child pornography is just as ridiculous as if someone compared a picture of a fight to assault, or comparing the picture of a killing to murder, and demanded legal action towards the content and it's creator and viewers.
It's absurd, the court system KNOWS THIS and DEFENDS our write to draw and express ourselves freely... For now. If anything changes, I'd be sorely disappointed, because I probably shouldn't go to jail for genocide if I choose to read the Iliad, or get a speeding ticket if I watch James Bond in a car chase. But for now, treat yourself to some Toothcup and ignore me, the politico. Draw away! ^_^