Omega-3 Benefits
14 years ago
Well, I'm trying out something different this time. Video blog ahoy! If this is well received, I will most likely do updates in this form from now on. I found it was exceptionally easier to talk about the information and hope it is as easy to understand.
Any and all questions and comments are welcome, and I will do my utmost to respond in a timely fashion.
If you want to favorite this journal, please go to http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6589856/ and fav there. :)
Orion~
Any and all questions and comments are welcome, and I will do my utmost to respond in a timely fashion.
If you want to favorite this journal, please go to http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6589856/ and fav there. :)
Orion~
FA+

In regards to the information you've posted, I've got to admit that I am no health guru, I don't know as much as I'd like to, and I am.......
.....a fatty (but not an acid). <insert appropriately shocked gasps here>
In trying to change my lifestyle to be conducive to better health, I have taken to absorbing as much information on the subject as I can, in the hopes that it will spur some change, and I feel obligated to inform you of something I've come across that contradicts your advice to supplement omega-3, or at least slightly disagrees with it.
Have you ever heard of a documentary by the name of Forks Over Knives? I found it recently via Netflix, watched it, and was taken by it enough to buy the book and chew through it as well (no pun intended). Said book spoke of omega-3, and what it had to say seems to relate well to what you mention of the body preferentially breaking down omega-6. The publication advised not supplementing omega-3, because it stated that the diet they purported - a diet comprised of as much whole foods as you can get your hands on and as little meat and dairy as possible - would allow your body to adjust imbalances in the two nutrients, allowing it to resume normal levels and negate the need for a supplement. Here, I'll just quote the damn book:
"There are two essential fatty acids, meaning you must consume them in foods--omega-3 and omega-6. Humans have historically consumed a diet with a ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids ranging from 1:1 to 1:4. In recent years, as consumption of animal foods and polyunsaturated vegetable oils (in processed foods) has increased, this ratio has changed dramatically: The range is now about 1:25 to 1:30. As a result, many health-care professionals are suggesting that people take omega-3 supplements such as fish oil or increase their consumption of fish to correct this imbalance. But supplements cause side effects, and fish oil is not a great option because it contains cholesterol, saturated fat, and often mercury and other toxins. (There are also negative ecological implications of eating fish--see page 38). The better option is to eat a well-structured, plant-based diet, which reduces the consumption of omega-6 fatty acids and negates the need to increase your intake of omega-3 fatty acids."
Normally, I'd be willing to dismiss this as so much vegetarian hooplah, but I have to admit, the science-lover in me cannot disregard the massive bodies of evidence they are bringing to the table. It doesn't stink of bad science, not as far as I can tell (though it can get a little preachy), so I want to know your thoughts on the subject. What is your perspective? Do you believe that correcting the imbalance of the two nutrients through diet would, in fact, mean supplementation was unnecessary? Sound like a crock? Give it to me straight, boss!
The reason I did not go into too much detail on the changes to diet is relevant to how much a person is willing to change. Which is easier? 1: A person continues how they are, but adds in 2 or 3 supplements into their diet, or 2: A person foregoes almost all modern pre-prepared foods, preparing their foods from scratch as well as monitoring which meats, grains, fruits, and liquids contain the correct ratio of needed fats.
The cost and time involved are rather large in option #2, but the according health benefits are also very large. But the sacrifice and change required to do that is lifestyle changing. But by promoting option #1 as I do in this blog, it's taking a baby step towards being a much healthier person. And it is much more likely to be a successful change in someone's life by starting small, than changing everything at once. I more than anything do not want to scare someone who thinks 'I'm doing okay, but maybe I'll try this one thing, and see what happens' by instead telling them they need to change every aspect of their lifestyle.
So in summary, no 'supplement' is ever needed if you eat a perfect diet, live an energetic and healthy lifestyle, and are never exposed to excess toxic chemicals. Supplements are just that, things added in to support weak areas in how people live. But each person has to choose which are going to be most beneficial to them. I am passionate about living a healthy lifestyle and I took the path to where I am now one small step at a time.
Thank you very much for the stimulating question. I hope I was able to convey my reasoning behind the way I presented the material. If you have anything else you would like to ask, or bring to my attention, please do! The only way I can learn more is to always be open to others.
Orion~
maybe its because I'm a catfurry buutttt its good stuff
what about Omega 9s?