Silence for Connecticut
13 years ago
To observe a moment of silence for the victims of the Connecticut shooting I will not tweet, post or comment online for the remainder of the day out of respect.
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/1.....ool/?hpt=hp_t1
I encourage others to do the same, and to show their support. Violence and the death of innocent people, especially children, is deplorable and an act of cowardice. If you wish to join me, please repost this journal (retweet my comment here).
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/1.....ool/?hpt=hp_t1
I encourage others to do the same, and to show their support. Violence and the death of innocent people, especially children, is deplorable and an act of cowardice. If you wish to join me, please repost this journal (retweet my comment here).
That's what I heard anyway. I've been watching nonstop news coverage on it for hours.
The Brady bill was implemented for a reason.
It should also be noted that if people are not able to acquire a firearm legally then its probably assumed they are dangerous individuals who shouldn't be allowed the 'right' to own or operate one.
Of course I dont think anyone should have the 'right' to easily and blatantly own any weapon in which people may come to harm weather they are of sound mind or not.
On top of that, these "evil" rifles you talk about are nothing more than civilian sporting rifles dressed up in tactical accessories to make them look cool. Real military weapons are illegal to purchase in the US (besides a few states, though the paperowrk and taxes that come with it make it too much of a hassle to bother with). These "scary" guns are no more lethal than your run of the mill ranch rifle. They are both the same weapons, except that one is black and the other is made of wood. Besides that, they are the same gun.
And like my friend was pointing out earlier, this was neither the time or place for you to be crying for gun control. You should have waited a week at least before voicing your opinion. What you did was rather offensive and a total disrespect for the people who died that day.
It feels like it was just a short time ago we had that dreadful shooting in that cinema.....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art.....ut-school.html
Veteran's Day. What would your friends in the Forces say if you said 'you know what? Let's not hold a moment for the guys of Charlie Company that got blown to bits last month. That won't help them at all!'.
They'd beat the shit out of you, you massive tool. Holding silence is a mark of respect - something you obviously don't have. You're a fucking cunt, go catch the next bullet for me, would you?
You, Sir, need to step away from the Internet. Honestly, back up a little there.
No pandas were harmed during this trolling.
I also posted my opinion and plea for such here: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/4126328/
It won't completely fix the problems.
NOTHING EVER EVER -COMPLETELY- fixes problems.
But goddamnit, you can get a gun in the united states in WALMART.
How is that a GOOD thing? HOW?
Right.
But it doesn't mean you make it EASIER for that sick pedo killer and put guns at walmart or ALMOST EVERYWHERE.
Like I said, gun control won't fix completely a problem that comes from a sick mind.
Nothing can -completely- fix a problem.
But it doesn't mean that there is NO NEED to try to make it even harder for those sickos to get guns.
And my question remains: what GOOD comes from having guns as easy to buy that they are found on WALMARTS?
What good is SO precious that they NEED to be there, even if it means a possible VERY REAL danger to others?
Why do you think school shootings happen mostly in the united states and so often there?
Don't you see a pattern?
> Sickos will always get guns
> Give the teachers guns!
> Give the kids guns?
> Give EVERYONE GUNS!!!
Now everybody has guns.
THERE. A SAFER COUNTRY.
.... WHAT THE SHIT!??!?!
I repeat: OF COURSE -some- sickos WILL find out a way to get an illegal arm (illegal if they were banned, like in most civilized countries)
OF COURSE they will find a way.
Does it mean, that they SHOULDN'T make it HARDER???
I mean, for fuck's sake! BUYING GUNS AT A SUPERMARKET?!?!? that's ... ...that blows everybody's minds around the world, except some americans apparently.
They want and love their guns MORE than caring about the RISK it creates to let anyone get one.
There are bullies ALL over the world
sickos ALL over the world.
But you hear the "school shootings" and "office shootings" a LOT in the united states.
A lot more than WHAT IT SHOULD.
Americans need to SEE THE PATTERN HERE, and ban the goddamn guns.
Petty sports and stupid shootings at some gun-fair, are NOT worth -ADDING- risk of shootings and adding MORE chances for these sicko pedo killers to get a gun and kill.
Of COURSE "Guns don't kill people" People do.
DOESN'T MEAN YOU ADD RISKS
DOESN'T MEAN IT ISN'T WORTH IT TO REDUCE RISK.
It will ALWAYS be worth it to reduce the risk.
It won't be 100% effective. NOTHING is 100% effective for fuck's sake.
But STILL it is ALWAYS worth it to keep on REDUCING risks!!!
Maybe we should also add mental health evaluations, instead of limiting access to guns?
R E D U C E T H E R I S K S
Even if it doesn't solve 100% the problem, cause nothing does
R E D U C E T H E R I S K S
.... Who in their right minds defends more the right to carry guns and to sell them at supermarkets, ABOVE CHILDREN DYING IN SHOOTINGS, because it was EASY for that sicko to get a gun, surely at some supermarket.
There is a pattern.
You can argue ALL you want, the pattern is STILL THERE, and it is happening as a United States problem.
You cannot cover the sun with one thumb.
Unbelievable that americans prioritize the ease access to have guns and -NOT- THE EASE ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL.
Reduce, the risk.
It will always be worth it.
Reduce the risk.
Make it MORE DIFFICULT, MORE MORE AND MORE difficult, MORE each time, HARDER, make it VERY DIFFICULT to get guns, instead of selling them at the grocerie store.
It will -ALWAYS- be worth it to reduce the risk.
Does it solve the problem? No.
It helps? Yes. you bet your damn ass it does help.
As much as the news will contradict this, crime has been going down, and it's -not- because of this, nor because of tougher laws, nor because of the "Truth in Sentencing Laws." (Compare Oregon to New York and California. New York and California has a LESS incarceration rate than Oregon, and crime there is STILL DROPPING in both states)
Gun control is not the problem, NOR is it the solution. Both the republicans and the gun control advocates are WRONG.
Mental health IS the answer.
Read this, please.
United States, where:
- Ease of access to guns > Ease of access to healthcare for the MENTALLY ILL
- A person with a gun did that? Let's give everybody else guns so that they defend themselves! ...Now everybody has guns! SAFER COUNTRY! /StupidLogic
- Constant shootings on schools, offices, etc.
- Not seeing the pattern
- Defending guns > Children massacre
- Gun fair, Sports, Shooting empty cans, FUN FUN FUN > The risk it causes when guns are that easy to get, ...for fun, right?
- Reducing the risk and making it harder for criminals and sickos? ...nah, not worth it. LET'S SELL GUNS AT THE SUPERMARKET.
Wake up, united states.
Your logics and priorities are upside down.
Reducing the risk isn't magically solving a problem.
There isn't FULL solutions for problems.
Reducing the risk IS STILL a -MUST-, cause it DOES make a difference.
Would you prefer that only criminals have guns? Because remember, if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
Shootings are nowhere near as constant as you'd have us believe, and the real risk of guns comes from those who know little about them. Gun safety and training is important.
"Reducing the risk and making it harder for criminals and sickos? ...nah, not worth it. LET'S SELL GUNS AT THE SUPERMARKET."
Welp. What is wrong with this line? It's not made harder for criminals to acquire guns just by making it impossible for law-abiding citizens to do so. And no, guns aren't sold at the supermarket, you putz.
You are literally the worst kind of fearmonger, spewing illogic in defense of your own insane aims.
But I can see you are gunning hard (lol, pun maybe intended) for that Darwin Award. There's a reason people don't bring knives to gunfights. If people like teachers were allowed to have guns, the death toll could've been lessened considerably. The world is growing more chaotic by the day and preventing good, law-abiding people from adequately defending themselves (unless you're some kind of magic wizard who can dodge bullets) is the pinnacle of retardism.
"but do you really feel emotionally and mentally fit to injure or even kill some one in the name of self defence?"
Yes. Yes I do. If someone's gonna come up to me and try to take what's by rights mine? You're damn right I'm gonna turn around and foul up their day.
Plus USA is a country of fear, look at the sensationalism of 9/11. I understand what you're saying, I'm not calling you stupid or anything, but I get a very different vibe when I go down the the States and not exactly a friendly one. Canada has lots of faults, sure it can be dangerous here too, but there is just *so* much violence in the states... it has some of the most violent history of any westernized country.. something is obviously not quite right..
This country only has a bed reputation because idiots are allowed to have a gun. And by that I mean they find whatever means necessary to get a gun. I can't wait to hear the laughable excuse as to why this 26 year old man felt the need to shoot off at innocent kids and what's even more hilarious is that in almost (if not all) the shooter(s) kill themselves(s).
Sorry I disagree with you.
"Refer to my previous post"
"Refer to my previous post"
*previous post is hidden*
People are always dying in some way and as far as shootings go I don't see you giving a fuck about any of the others that happened during 2012.
>Guy gets stabbed drops gun and goes to jail (35% OR LESS chance he dies)
Or
>I get shot in the fucking face because I didn't feel the need to save myself from some moron with a gun..
Think about what you say.
The issue isn't the guns, it's the PEOPLE.
If you take away the guns the dedicated will find an alternative method.
Look around your house; you'll find an assorted array of potentially deadly weapons. Should we ban kitchen knifes and baseball bats?
Like I said; the issue is PEOPLE.
We need to put this effort into researching people's mental health and WHY they feel like this - and work on rehabilitating them.
THAT is the more efficient solution.
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/imag.....77177_ila7.jpg
I wouldn't put this shooter there, hah.
What about an electrical chair? To bring it back for old time's sake?
Or maybe guantanamo, where he'll be tortured and posibly raped for the rest of his miserable pathetic life. That would be better.
I know what you meant tho', putting him next to him on the list of fucked up people, to that level.
... Maybe more, since he shot CHILDREN.
Wishing torture on someone.... *sighs* Not cool.
no amount of prayer will bring those kids back (and its a douchey, empty gesture anyways). nor will candle-lightings or silence.
Just hug your kids or other loved ones while you can, and move on.
The YouTube account which submitted the video also disagrees with the video's contents, but uploaded it in order to raise awareness of right-wing extremism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is2x7QTZ8AI
Disgusting little man...
They did this with Hurricane Sandy, the Tokyo earthquakes, any time any disaster happens be it natural or man-made.
They're just cuckoo.
you know, my mom thought about moving to Connecticut around that area, but i didnt feel like leaving Mass, and i'm glad my instinct was right. i feel terrible about what happened. no amount of compensation can fix the damage caused by this incident.
My thoughts will go to the families who have lost their loved ones.
And to Doggydog: "A wise man knows when to stop talking" ~whoever said that quote.
Aka. Stay on topic or don't reply at all. We're talking about the deaths of 27-29 children here while you're rambling on about your 'gun-control-safety'-USI parade.
As much as I agree with you on that, I agree with everyone else on your insensitivity towards the subject at hand. No offense.
I wonder how long it's going to take for people to realize that just because you take away the guns criminals and nut cases are still going to find a way to obtain them by whatever means necessary. When taking away guns you take away the guns for law-abiding citizens to use to defend themselves when threatened or attacked. The school faculty could have had at least one gun or even a tazer (depending on how far it shoots) to protect themselves and these kids because lets think for a moment here:
School Faculty: 20+ people
Shooter(s): 1 people
The guy would have been outnumbered too easily but hey, "Guns.are.bad." Ugh!
I can't wait till they diagnose this sucker, should be hilarious because cartoons, movies, shows, video games and guns (themselves) are the roof of all evil.
We always follow these tragedies with silence and they just keep happening more and more frequently. We need to start making it harder to buy guns. It IS guns that kill people. Would you let people buy a nuclear weapon? No? Then stop with the guns.
I will NOT tolerate this call for "silence" anymore. We must stand up and protest until the laws are changed. Those who are silent are just as responsible as the person who pulled the trigger.
http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-10.....e-rate-rising/
New York has the strictest gun laws in the entire United States; but you still see and hear about gun crimes happening in New York City.
Devoted criminals who are devoted to commit an armed crime with a firearm will buy a firearm through a street dealer/black market - so instead of funding a gun store they'll fund drug lords.
The only people who will be restricted to their firearms will be the law-abiding citizen who never intends to use one in such a way - only for defense, collections, hunting, recreational target shooting etc.
Gun control is not the solution; it's the PEOPLE that are using these "tools"
If this person would have received the proper attention and psychiatric treatment this entire event could have been avoided.
Maybe add a psych test to one of the requirements of purchasing a firearm; making sure that the person buying the firearm is mentally sound? I'd be for that.
You can kill many times more people with a gun than others means.
Should we allow everyone to own their own nuclear weapon because, well, they will find a way to kill people anyway?
I mean, yes, you can strangle someone to death with your bare hands if you want to, but it's a lot harder than pulling the trigger from far away. Guns are very, very dangerous and are designed to make killing easier and to allow more people to be killed.
Do you think gun laws will suddenly take all the guns away from the gang bangers, drug dealers and human traffickers? Hell no; they're gonna stay armed and they'll do ANYTHING to keep their arms.
Do you think gun laws will suddenly make a bank robber stop and go "You know what; I don't have a license to own this firearm"? Hell no.
Gun control will NOT stop the criminals; they'll only make the law abiding citizen defenseless.
I'll repeat - the issue isn't guns, it's the PEOPLE. This entire shooting could have been avoided if this kid was taken to a shrink ("That boy needs therapy!")
Proving that history would pretty much repeat itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohib....._United_States
I fail to see the connection - an ICBM is meant to take out entire countries (and capable of causing global destruction) ; not as a personal self defense weapon.
Plus it's very impractical; I mean you have to do the arming sequence, opening the bay doors, warming up the ICBM's rockets, fire the missile, and wait for it to hit it's target - takes hours. :P
ICBMs are made by the government for the government - if an ICBM ever fell into citizen's hands then call Bruce Willis because we have a "Die Hard" scenario.
(However if you wanted to talk about the Cold War and the whole Arms Race debate I'd love to talk about that sometime - but that's not your intended subject sadly)
--
Owning a pistol is not the same as owning a multi-billion dollar ICBM missile.
No, citizens should own weapons that are meant to cause MASS DESTRUCTION.
Also, citizens should not have the right of owning explosive weapons/MANPADS such as (but not limited to) RPG7s, FIM-92 Stingers, Javelin missiles, etc.
What reason is there to allow magazines containing 30 bullets? That is not required for self defense.
A handgun bought for self defense is more likely to be used to kill a family member than it is an intruder, but that isn't really pertinent to whether assault weapons and large magazines should be legal and how they should be regulated.
They purchase their firearms from the black market; from street dealers - they don't give two shits about permits, background checks or whatnot; it's just business to them.
Restrict firearms and these criminals will have the upper advantage; leaving the law-abiding citizen defenseless against these criminals.
Having relaxed laws and the 'black market' make it all to easy for any individual having a bad day to just snap and take out have the neighborhood.
I postulate one would have to be quite pessimistic to believe changes will never come. I thought it was only authoritative figures that tried to beat that way of thinking into people.
I've been around FA for a while but I never keep up appearances.
You may have seen my other username elsewhere.
Just FYI.
I am not there, I did not die
My own personal hobby-horse: it's not about gun-control, folks, it's about paying some fucking attention to one's kids, especially if they are showing signs of having problems this severe. So often, I read reports about incidents like this and the shooter is nearly always described as "nice, but quiet", "had some emotional issues", "undiagnosed mental illness", "was diagnosed with..." etc. Time to start examining how we treat the mentally-ill, I think.
We avoid them, ostracize them, fear them, even mock those with depression, schizophrenia, personality disorders of various sorts, but we do little to nothing to actually help them. (an FYI: I have a severe mental illness that needs drugs to control. Without them, I would have tried to kill myself several times over. I doubt I have the turn of mind that would have me ever hurting anyone else, but believe me, the urge was there. Sometimes, there is massive rage with no obvious source...) I realize that, in most cases, the families have tried to reach out to them, at least on some level, but it's too often too little too late, and then someone else dies in a fiery shootout in a high-school, a college, a theatre, on the highway on the way to work...
Emotional pain is a community problem, not something to ignore.
My deepest condolences to the families of all involved.