[UPDATED] AUP Update Regarding Commission Notices & Auctions
12 years ago
🏳️🌈💖Enjoy the site? Please consider supporting us via the links below!💖🏳️🌈
⭐ FA+ ⭐ SHOP ⭐ KO-FI ⭐
Journal Start
On our last episode of As the AUP Changes, we had left our intrepid Ferrox knee-deep in user comments! Were they complaints? Were they compliments? Does Fender even know how to read? Find out in our latest installment!
Previously, we made an update to the AUP which stated "Advertisements (e.g. auctions, YCH/Your Character Here and commission notices/price guides) may be uploaded" to scraps. Some users have expressed concerns that this limits their outreach and potentially stagnates sales. The rule was included to help stop the Incredible Flood of Advertisements™ that we sometimes got to encounter on a daily basis. We've changed the policy to one that offers more freedom for users yet helps stop the flood of advertisements. A middle ground, if you will.
The new policy reads:
* Price guides may be posted but are limited to one submission per type of art (e.g. one for visual arts, one for fursuiting) at any given time.
* Submissions used to sell art (e.g. commission auctions, adoptables, YCH) may be uploaded but are limited to one submission per account at any given time. Advertisements posted must be new and original submissions. Reposting of the same item is not permitted. Previously sold items (such as original characters or designs) may be left in a user's gallery as art.
You may post auctions or items for sale to your galleries, but are limited to no more than one at a time.
Q: Can I incessantly post auction reminders every 10 minutes so that people know I have an auction up?
A: Nope.
Q: If created 10,194 adoptables, can I post a submission for each one of them?
A: Nope.
Q: Why not?
A: Nope.
UPDATE
We revised the policy further to help make things more clear. The old revision was "Commission prices guides may be posted, but are limited to one submission at a time. Advertisements for art-related items (e.g. commission auctions, adoptables) may also be uploaded, but are also limited to one submission at a time. Advertisements posted must be new and original submissions."
Previously, we made an update to the AUP which stated "Advertisements (e.g. auctions, YCH/Your Character Here and commission notices/price guides) may be uploaded" to scraps. Some users have expressed concerns that this limits their outreach and potentially stagnates sales. The rule was included to help stop the Incredible Flood of Advertisements™ that we sometimes got to encounter on a daily basis. We've changed the policy to one that offers more freedom for users yet helps stop the flood of advertisements. A middle ground, if you will.
The new policy reads:
* Price guides may be posted but are limited to one submission per type of art (e.g. one for visual arts, one for fursuiting) at any given time.
* Submissions used to sell art (e.g. commission auctions, adoptables, YCH) may be uploaded but are limited to one submission per account at any given time. Advertisements posted must be new and original submissions. Reposting of the same item is not permitted. Previously sold items (such as original characters or designs) may be left in a user's gallery as art.
You may post auctions or items for sale to your galleries, but are limited to no more than one at a time.
Q: Can I incessantly post auction reminders every 10 minutes so that people know I have an auction up?
A: Nope.
Q: If created 10,194 adoptables, can I post a submission for each one of them?
A: Nope.
Q: Why not?
A: Nope.
UPDATE
We revised the policy further to help make things more clear. The old revision was "Commission prices guides may be posted, but are limited to one submission at a time. Advertisements for art-related items (e.g. commission auctions, adoptables) may also be uploaded, but are also limited to one submission at a time. Advertisements posted must be new and original submissions."
Limits, hmmm. . .well better than saying no all together.
Isn't affected :>
/whoops
Or if I am feeling adventurous, I will sneak onto the front page ONLY to browse for fursuits in the fursuit category. EVEN THAT IS DANGEROUS.
The static on my TV is art then.
A: Nope.
Good.
A: Nope.
Love it.
I'd say at most 3 advertisements.
and I've seen on the front page people literally posting the same picture every 5 minutes. I don't get how people think that's acceptable in the least.
Like maybe an option to watch commission page vs. regular gallery? Or both.. Something.
I look forward to further updates on FA's part thouh I'd imagine the admins are busy with other things too. xD;
I'm just saying there should be a specific time frame for such a rule.
Well once a day then? I don't know. What I find acceptable isn't what everyone does so let's not get nit picky, it's up to the admins not me.
Maybe unblock before replying to me? No idea why I am though. :I
Lol I don't recall who I block after a while but if you did or said something stupid somewhere your there for a reason. Sorry buddy.
I can't pinpoint what or where, but you said or did something I didn't agree with and thus got a block.
I never do it for any small reason. Your someone I wish to avoid. That is all. Anyway good luck! :)
IT WILL ARRIVE WITH THE THETA RELEASE OF FA.
i personally am not affected by people advertising at all O^O i don't visit the front page often and such. nor do i watch many people XD
*waits for the backlash*
Bummer. :{
Nope
Lol
when you say one at a time do you mean once a day? or just one time and thats it?
Seeing as this is a central hub for furries, this is also one of the few sites where steady income can be made via art.
Central Hub, eh it started out as an art site but now its just being shaped to be whatever people want it to be. (Or else others will constantly complain and they will have to mold to the users wantings. :P)
Not necessarily talking about you, since I don't think you're one of the people that overload my inbox every freakin day with multiple journals and submissions advertising streams
And I've bought ads in 6 month time slots, but not everyone has that luxury of spare cash.
<3 Now it's a site for whatever the people want it to be.
Surprised though, that we haven't established a groups page on here for all those groups we have floating around. Like a tab you can click on to go to groups and join if you wished. Would be rather neat.
hehe that last one is kinda catchy actually.
Ask yourself this: how did artists promote their work and get commissions before FA? The answer lies within.
I know this response may sound harsh, but it's the truth.
Upload to other furry sites (e.g. SoFurry) and get your art out there, and cross link here and back. Exposure benefits artists greatly, and will help your auctions, sellables and commissions.
Most of those sites have a terrible impression of furries and strongly dislike them. People get plenty of hate on there without advertising furry commissions. Most people's families are also linked in to those networks. Do you really think Johnny C. wants his grammy and grampa seeing that he's holding an auction for seven animal people having sex??
SoFurry and Inkbunny and even Weazyl are next to dead compared to this site. Advertising there will get you next to noiwhere, except maybe in the hole with your bank.
And like someone else said, that's pretty much the only way to get commissions on other sites, anyway. Advertise OFTEN.
I think that once or twice a day should be acceptable. Once every hour is a bit much, but like someone ELSE said, they easily get buried under other submissions anyway.
Trying to justify the AUP change with the sum of 'try harder' is absurd. A site, built around arts, disregarding artists and claiming a middle ground, a compromise which limits their potential for success is backwards at best.
I saw this all coming, it was completely and utterly predictable and I worked it out very quickly what was going to happen, what the artists would think, and why it wasn't a good idea, and my worry apparently fell on deaf ears. And I don't even bother with such auctions myself because they don't work for me, but I am thinking of others here.
Uploading once a day doesn't flood the site at all. It brings something to the front page once a day, and gets us (artists) more exposure on our auction, be it on site or off.
The majority of people do not look at journals unless it says free art or something else intended to grab attention. If you do that often, people are going to start ignoring it or expecting it to be something unimportant. Additionally, that only alerts people who are already watching you, not new viewers.
The same goes for Twitter, Facebook, personal websites and so on. For one, not many people watch those sites of artists unless they're decently well known. Again, it's going to be the same people who see it on your journals, or uploaded that one time in your submission. If they aren't going to bid, they aren't going to bid. There's no exposure there. It's like going up to someone, asking to bum a smoke... being told that person doesn't have any... and asking again and again. What good does it do? None.
Now, don't try to say that uploading other art brings exposure to your page just as good as that ad does, because well... Not everyone uploads art every day, or even every week. I know I don't.
Like it or not, this is the same way people would get commissions on deviantart or any other site. Advertising, often. That's what uploading that image is. It's *advertising*. Once a day is *hardly* a flood. To me, if someone takes such issue with seeing one image more than once in their inbox, why are they watching any artists at all! I mean, I get dozens of uploads on my deviantart account, and I pay attention to less than half of them, due to subject matter or thumbnails that don't interest me. I don't get annoyed about that, I mean really.
Basically what you're saying is that artists can advertise on the site, but only to people who already have seen that same advertisement and have no interest in the auction or whatever else.
Additionally, regarding the adoptables rule, when I post an adoptable, save for one, it's a full character sheet, not a copy and paste job. I'm not going to compile them all into one horribly compressed image, because they're not simple little copy paste jobs. What next, upload every badge and icon into one image? That doesn't work, when you do highly detailed, large dpi images that have great details that don't show up shrunk down. Same goes for unique adoptables. I agree for copy paste ones, but come on.
If it bothers that much, why not add a widget similar to what nabyn had (and has, for sketchbook updates) that you can click on to see what auctions or advertisements people have going on? Make it easier for the artists, rather than hindering them, or at least find some kind of happy medium, rather than obliterating the chances of one party to appease another.
I'm not a artist, but there has to be a way for them to get exposure to new audiences. I've watched several artist because I was randomly browsing and found a auction or prepose I liked, and bid on it.
If you think someone is posting more reminders or journals etc. than you want to sort through. Unwatch them. Don't tell them they cann't do it anymore. Let me add, livestream events are in my opinion, the most fun aspect of this site. Watching people draw and chatting with them is just plain fun (most of the time).
In any case, I don't need you starting a pointless argument. I wasn't even addressing you
Not everyone completes a piece a day. I could upload a sketch, but I don't get any new watchers from sketches like I do finished pieces... not all of us spend all our time drawing, not all of us can.
"Or buy ads on the site."
I have. They're not really effective. In the rotation they're at and with the amount of people using ad block, i get maaaaybe 50 new watchers, tops. I could get that if I uploaded old art in rotation for a week... for free. I'm not paying for a service that doesn't work well. Not everyone can afford it, either.
" Put out some actual effort and stop harassing us."
Nobody is harassing anyone. Delete the upload, get over it.
"In any case, I don't need you starting a pointless argument. I wasn't even addressing you "
You are posting in a public forum. People are going to respond. If you don't want people taking serious issue with your rude and false statements (art isn't a real job, really??) then don't post.
Wait, weren't you the same person who sent out notes to everyone trying to get people to help your friend, failing that make advertisements for them?
So it's cool to use us and your skills when it benefits you, but not ok if we're trying to make an actual living on our "fake job"?
And while I personally don't agree with people relying 100% on commission revenue as an income if they can help it,
the economy isn't exactly conducive to employment right now. Its really not that hard to nuke your submissions if it bothers you that much, or just unwatch people. I've been annoyed by artists uploading too often in the past: I unwatched them.
Is it really THAT MUCH of a hassle to just delete what you don't want?
One a day, delete it, it's no big deal. I'm not talking about once an hour, or every few minutes, but one a day. As for watchers being the majority of users... they'd have nothing to watch without artists creating content, whether they're people like me, or beginners.
As for "a real job", art IS a real job, like it or not. I work two jobs- my day job (for your purposes a "real" job) and I freelance. Whether you define it as a job or not, it is one. I have obligations to my customers just as I do when I go to work every day. Without my second, freelancing job, I would not be able to afford all my bills, OR the occasional fun purchase. Without being able to advertise and get more exposure, I don't get commissions.
What I have described in my post is the reality of the situation and a reasonable option for both artists and watchers. If deleting a submission once every 24 hours for 5-7 days bothers you that much, I don't understand why you're watching people at all.
art is a job, sometimes a VERY well paid job. YOU. stop being selfish
People have become a lot more successful BY posting regular updates on auctions and the like on FA because it is the primary visual medium these days.
You are, in essence, trying to put the proverbial genie back in the bottle because you don't like the clothes he's wearing.
FA has become a primary resource for artists to gain exposure, and this is basically FA saying "Sorry... that's not how we think it should be done, don't care if it's effective."
And I say this as someone that spends several hundred dollars a year on visual 2D art, and doesn't have a G+ or Facebook account, most I have is a Twitter and Dreamwidth anymore. Some way to 'bump' older ads afloat in the submissions floodwaters (which they really are, especially with how archaic it is w/ the whole 'mark as read' mechanism versus a proper interleaved timeline of all artists you watch) is effective for those of us that only check the site a couple times a day. Even the other art sites allow that or something similar.
If anything, the journal-spam of 'Must post a link back to this journal to get in a free art Raffle' entries are far more annoying and disruptive IMHO than keeping an auction/YCH/whatever afloat in my queue.
This, I tried doing it once for exposure and it did no good, was disruptive, and was actually to the point where I found people just posting mass journals with raffles in order to enter, which defeated the purpose. I'll never do it again because it was that much of a hassle for ME, let alone others.
But gods forbid we upload art to gain exposure instead. Tut tut.
Thankfully they are limited. I only post one at a time, but I see people posting ads for them every 20 minutes. -_-
People do YCH and regular auctions, and they regularly go $100+. My commissions start at $150, and my YCH offers in the past I've actually offered for cheaper, because it's less work for me (provided the buyer doesn't ask for a bunch of changes to the sketch, which has happened to me in the past).
Whether it's an auction for a YCH type piece or an auction for one without a pre-sketch (the only difference is that the pose you see is the one you get, rather than thinking up one on your own, which is helpful to many people), the bidding goes how it goes. If people are willing to pay a reasonable amount for the work, then good!
But it's different or everyone I guess. But either way, it's a great way to support an artist you like, and not just try to snatch some art from them.
What I don't understand is -- okay, you have a YCH auction, thats fine. I support it. But, YCH auctions shouldn't go overboard more than a hundred dollars. Unless you are willing to pay for them, and it can screw the artist/commissioner. I've got a YCH commissioned slot, IM not saying its bad, people just gotta look out for what they are selling/bartering rather barking up money. o_o
But eh, that's just me!
Considering the fact that according to Copy-write law, you can NOT claim a character design. Only the name. To get more than that, you have to apply for TRADEMARKING, which requires paperwork and proof, THUS, anyone posting Adoptables is selling something that people can TAKE for FREE.
Better to avoid the claims of Adoptable Theft all together by banning the adoptables.
You can still copyright a design and a piece of art. Characters have to be trademarked.
there is nothing wrong with unique adoptables.
I've noticed through posting them that some people, usually the same people, come back and collect characters from adoptable auctions to make their own little storyline because they can't afford full commissions, can't draw, or don't have a firm idea in their minds.
treating this subject as black and white as you seem to have done in this comment is not the way to go about it at all.
I mean surely a person can take the design without permission and use it but not only is that a very dick move but it's technically art theft.
However, while there is nothing legally stopping someone from swiping a design, most folks are decent people and there is a market for buying designs here on the site.
And banning adoptables would cause way more trouble than it's worth. ;P But I may be biased because I design and sell my own, as well as love buying other people's designs.
Recently an artist I admire mentioned having trouble with people posting offers for his auction and then not holding their part of the bargain. I've heard some people recommend Furbuy but I'm wondering if FA as a website has some sort of "official recommendation" or something. Thanks!
nope
nope
nope
//confused sorry
One submission at a time.
I've never liked Tuesdays.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/.....mggbejocemkogl
I know this'll help a lot of people chill out at least a little.
And is it Once for EVERYTHING or could you have your one price list and an auction going on at the same time?
Sense has not been made. :|
Now if you said, Have an auction, then allow ONE auction reminder (with specified text) up at a time, say in a 24/48 hr period - that would be logical. What you said above is not.
All the bids would be deleted. :/
Nope!"
ROTFLMAO...but thanks for the heads up!!
Then, my first question, what about users who advertise offsite things such as say... cushy pen, webcomics, other art sits, etc, by uploading pictures in their gallery that link to those sites? (in other words, use FA for free advertising). Or users hwo post "teaser" pics of said sites?
Personally i take this as a form of free advertising for another website to make money, and ive given my 2 cents to the artists who do it.
This is a bit hypocritical too, just so you know
"Bawwwwww they're uploading art too many times, it's so hard to delete them, stop posting journalsssssss -Sobbu-"
It's kind of pathetic really.
I'll take the change because this site has traffic, unlike a lot of the others. But really I think it just caters to popufurs.
Though I can totally see what you're suggesting being truth. It's making people embrace this rule much better than they would have before.
And yeah it totally makes sense, right! XD
Kinda like fishing. Which is why I always say I'm "Commission fishing" xD
And yeah same, I've met a lot of awesome people through stream posts and ych auction posters, many of whom I'd never have known about had I not found them under browse. When you're new, it's the easiest way to find new people who fit your style. And if popufurs is all you see, it'd be pretty difficult to find people on your level with affordable prices and willing trade art and the like.
Like I post a sheet of cats and then a sheet of dogs, is that not allowed?
instead of taking care of things that matter, that can be policed....
seems pretty damn limiting to me
as many have said, its no problem to the popular artists, but the lesser known artists, being the main ones who're affected by this 'rule' will be suffering because of it
there is more i'd like to add to this, but its 4am here, and I'm too tired to bother putting across an argument
5 minutes?
10 minutes?
20 minutes?
30 minutes?
An hour?
...does 'at a time' mean that, to post a second one, you must delete the first?
*MASSIVE ROUND OF APPLAUSE*
~Spooky
I know that it says you may only post one of these things at a time. ( 1 Sale/etc and 1 commissions sheet).
Here's where I get a little confused.
After the sale or what have you is completed, do we need to completely remove the sale image altogether or are we allowed to send it to scraps?
And, if we're not allowed to send them to scraps, will we be penalized for old sale submissions in scraps that were there before the new rules took effect?
Fender/Dragoneer, would that be acceptable?
I really care less if it is "ORIGINAL" submissions. Keep posting your streams and prices and for sale stuff. As long as I am not clearing the ONE out every day... I don't care.
I find it rather sad that you can't "reuse" the same image if it is the only one and not spammed like a .... well I will just say just don't annoy me plz.
It's not a valid statement though. For an AUP, it has indeed changed a lot in the past year, feedback or not. I'm not one to balk against rules, I just like rules to be rules, with a bit of consistent longevity.
Not all replies will be pats on the back of course and it's not really a statement of total disagreement. Just an observation.
Yay Admins on this. I approve
But decent update for once :U
Do stream notices count as ads?
Also, am I to assume that if I only create 10,193 adoptables, I can post a submission for each one of them?
A: Nope.
your my favorite kind of person
What i think.
http://www.slicksurface.com/blog/20.....dos-attack.png
Whats happening.
http://dailypicksandflicks.com/wp-c.....-lab-flood.jpg
Better solution to your problem. Add a black list.
Not unless the admins plan to troll every user's page, upload, and journal to ensure there are no duplicates ever, past or pending.
A: Nope.
Go home AutoReply, you're drunk~!
I do preposed pieces. Meaning I sell sketches that I customize to what people want. I post these in batches. Every few days, I delete the old submissions and resubmit the preposes. I have multiples ones that I'm selling at any given time. I repost them until they're sold. I don't make them auctions. They're flat buyout pieces.
Under the new AUP rules, does this mean that any given time, I can only have one submission up for the preposed pieces I offer? In total, I mean. Say I have 10 submissions that I repost every few days. I don't repost them all at once, I space them out over the day so that I don't spam. Under these new rules, are you saying I'm not allowed to repost any of my preposes at all?
I just want some clarification if possible.
If people are so annoyed by updates from artists trying to encourage sales, they should unwatch them or make use of that nifty 'nuke' button on every submission page. Limiting the amount of updates in a time period is one thing, such as one ad per day, but limitations of this degree are unrealistic. By trying to cater to the complains of one side, you're completely ignoring the needs of the other. That's now how things should be run.
And I agree with someone above who suggested the adoptable thing makes sense for cookie-cutter designs, but forcing an artist to stuff all of their unique designs onto one submission is messy and inconsiderate. Again, if people are so bothered by it, they can unwatch the person. Quite honestly, as an art site or whatever you classify this website as (but judging by the fact that its major component is a gallery, I'll go with art site), I don't really think one should be controlling how someone does business.
But that's just me.
Thank you~!
I buy a lot of commissions and I love that people can monetize their skills, but I get upset when people think they have a right to use a free, privately funded web site dedicated to art for the sake of making money. Especially when most of that funding comes from the people who run the site.
Nobody will be crippled from these new rules. Limiting the number of auctions on a site not designed for auctions makes perfect sense, and is perfectly reasonable.
Meanwhile, DA wants $30/yr. for the sake of not shoveling mal-ware infested ads in your face, and is trying to get a 20% cut of commissions sold without bearing any legal responsibility.
Deviantart has nothing to do with this. In my opinion this is just as bad, considering this rule only applies to for-profit related artwork, suggesting this is less about people's complaints and more about FA wanting more people to buy ads. Suggesting "Oh well DA's worse", really doesn't prove anything besides the fact that big websites like DA and FA aren't really thinking logically or fairly about their user-base. And I don't really know how to respond to the comment on the rights people have to take commissions or advertise here, so I'll leave that alone.
You're entitled to your opinion, but this is really just ignoring the needs and preferences of a huge majority of this site. If you can overlook subject matter you dislike, you can overlook the occasional ad.
Not only impractical, but unfair? What's so impractical or unfair about a private web site saying, "Okay, you can actually make money by hold auctions and YCH, but we don't want people to abuse the system like they have been doing for the last 6 months and has been generating complaints. To make things clear about how we want to limit the abuse, we're going to add an official rule limiting auctions to one submission at a time."
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me, given that I both buy and sell stuff here on FA, too.
I seriously doubt the new rule will put a dent in anyone's profits.
I don't really know how to respond to the comment on the rights people have to take commissions or advertise here
What rights? You're a guest. People are granted the privilege to do business here, but some people decide to abuse that privilege, thus necessitating new rules.
The reason why the rule has been added is not because the admins hate these auctions. It's because they are becoming so common and persistent that they are now a problem and resulting in flooding. Flooding is not the same as merely posting content you don't like.
Incidentally, I have an ad in my gallery. I update it maybe once every few months. Re-posting it once a day to keep in on the front page would be an abuse of the system, but by your argument, people can just ignore my constant spamming of the site because I have the right to post what I want. Sorry, but most people don't like spamming, and I doubt the desire to have floods of auctions and ads is in the best interest of this mythical "huge majority."
it's still freelance work if you sell it on fa- therefore if someone is making a living, it's not entirely that outrageous????? how is that self-entitlement. it's selfish of you to not try and respect how your favorite artists depend on the site for exposure, and now enjoy seeing the lot of them leave if they can't advertise properly because fa is messing with their freelance business.
can't advertise properly
FA has banner ads they can purchase, and artists can announce commissions in their journals and profiles. They also are allowed to post YCH auctions and adoptables.
Oh, wait... if they can only post one at a time, that's preventing them from advertising properly. My bad.
it's selfish of you to not try and respect how your favorite artists depend on the site for exposure
Selfish, huh? And those 350+ commissions I've bought over the last decade don't count... because?
The ability to network and mingle is far more important than spamming people with ads, and it's arguably even more important than their actual talent. Some artists manage to figure that out on their own, and simultaneously get lots of business while engaging in the community. The others feel sorry for themselves and whine about the rules all day.
-post an auction
-you apparently can't advertise before .. deleting... the.. auction??????
i like how you think buying commissions voids you of looking lazy.. you're still disrespecting them if you can't understand how they need exposure to grow with their viewer size- this is much more true for artists who are new compared to popufurs.
not everyone spams people when it comes to selling things though, it's those that do that are bringing this punishment and fucking everyone over in the end because there are a few idiots that spam the same image every 5 seconds. THAT i don't agree with. however, if someone is trying to make an ad once a day, if you're too damn lazy to click the delete button and just MOVE ON and let artists do their thing, then i really don't know what to say anymore lol
(ppssttt this is till just fa trying to push people to buy adspace because it's only related to profit goods!! because apparently i can post 500 request submissions at once!)
You can't post a new auction until you delete the old one. Only one at a time.
i like how you think buying commissions voids you of looking lazy.
You didn't say I was lazy. You said I didn't respect the artists.
and i still believe you don't! so let's agree to disagree, nothing can really change my mind. anyone who supports this aup change has a lack of respect for those of us who DON'T abuse the avertisements, but we're getting shafted anyway =u=
Now Mind you, none of this effects me one bit since I've yet to bother doing a 'your character here' and I rarely stream anything. Everyone on this site besides the head admin is a guest, but why should one guest's wants trump another because they're not getting the art they want to see how they want to see it?
I mean, seriously, am I the only one who doesn't bother looking at the front page so religiously that I don't notice this spamming people talk about, and even if I did, I sorta know how to hit the, next page button, or if it's in my watch submissions, I Know how to click on it and just delete it. You can't make life easy for people who are intent on making life as difficult for themselves as possible because it would require them to actually do something on their own to solve their own problem.
Come on. This is a fan web site. Heaven forbid both spectators and artists should want to have fun around here, and instead, everything should be business as usual and revolve around money. There's nothing wrong with making money on art, but elite artists are the ones who think they run the site and want things 100% their way.
Yes, limiting abuse of the site for the purpose of making money is far from impractical. Artists who want to make money are not more important than fans who want to have fun. There should be a balance, and that's exactly what the rules are supposed to ensure. Everyone gets to enjoy the system equally. Suggesting that limiting artists to one auction at a time will kill art and drive away spectators is just plain FUD. That's the kind of BS I'd expect to hear from a corporation. "Any regulation of any sort will KILL the economy and destroy jobs! We should be able to do whatever we want."
Nope.
If what you're suggesting is true, then FA shouldn't have become one of the biggest and most important furry web sites in the world. The fans did that. Piss off the fans, and see where your art profits go.
Sorry, but some artists whine and complain on their journals about how stupid and arrogant some people are, and stupid and arrogant people flood those journals. Other artists don't seem to have that problem. I've never had that problem. There's a reason for that.
Nobody said running a business is easy, but some run theirs better than others.
Does that mean for those of us who upload an image (and then remove it) for when we are doing livestreams we'd now have to have a 'brand new image' each time we wanted to post that we were doing a livestream event?
Forcing us to use only journals really sucks cause so many people don't read journals, don't even subscribe to them. Or they only read journals when they get around to them. Which can be in many cases days or weeks later. Which totally negates the whole purpose of trying to alert people to a time limited situation.
Say I post an adopt, it doesn't get any interest, so I delete it.
Then would I be able to upload it again every so often to refresh it?
As long as the file before it is deleted?
I don't do many YCH auctions, but I love making adopts. >3<
Thank you! <3
If I were to crop said auction art and write some wording on there saying "HEY...ONLY GOT XX hours to go!!"
Is that ok?
Also, if you have a ych posted, and while it's going, you go ahead and release a batch of adoptables, is that ok? Or is that not allowed?
Because again, if that's not allowed, it seems like you're screwing over the artists, especially when a lot of us earn our living off of this site.
It seems to me like you're just catering to one side to get them to hush, while completely ignoring the needs of the other.
And personally, journal spamming is a lot more annoying to me than submission spamming. I just think this is about the money for FA, or its just plain stupidity. Alienating the vast majorty of the userbase probably isn't the best idea
Unless it's a journal from a close friend, I usually just nuke them all.
2. Can I have a little more clarification on what kind of submissions are being limited, ie how are you actually defining a submission as an advertisement? Is it based solely on text in the submission or does it include advertising in the description of the submission as well? It's easy enough to identify as ads YCH and Auction adverts, but what if the submission itself is just an artwork, and the description states something like "I made this. If you like it, here's a link that will direct you to my ordering info / website / price page / etc where you can buy it or other art from me." I mean, it's too easy to argue that any submission on the site can be construed as an advertisement for an artist. I understand the reason for the rule change, but some further clarification would be appreciated!
I.E. Post an update for the original journal, delete the original announcement submission, then repost it.
Also, this is my personal opinion on this, so I hope not to offend any of the FA staff.
This new AUP rule seems a little over the top.
I understand the restricting the posting of new art to once every minute and trying to stop the flooding of art, but trying to live off of commissions is hard enough without this sort rule added :|
Again, no offence to any of the staff >.>
Ones that allow artists to submit their price guides to the group and they post them linking to their account?
I would assume that this means that the FA Admins would ban the user for flooding, which seems unfair.
I can have 3 or 4 auctions going, posted in scraps, and post 1 advertisement in my gallery for them all, linking to them?
FA is a pretty okay site, but I'm really disappointed in how FA is justifying the stigma against people who sell character designs. You say that it's legitimate art, but you're not treating it as such. I'm sure you can understand how frustrating that is.
*We still maintain the right to 5% of whatever you are selling with our ad.
I make a YCH/Auction and post it to fa.
I can't create a add out of that image correct?
Can I draw a stick figure or crappy cartoon of my character with text on advertising that auction/ych and post that?
Dumb example but only thing I could think of.