No such thing as a right way and a wrong way
12 years ago
https://picarto.tv/SimonAquarius for my livestreams, everyone's invited
https://www.patreon.com/simonaquarius to support my comic on Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/simonaquarius to support my comic on Patreon
Thinking about it, there are lots of ways to solve a problem, usually because the problems we face are hard to specify or aren't absolute and require humans to intervene because a machine can't be made for every possibility.
When you go to school they teach you only using regulated problems that the teachers already have the answers to. While this is good for math and physics it becomes difficult when getting into english or history. And once you leave high school and go to university they typically need to re-teach you math and physics more than the others.
The main reason for re-training is because while in reality math and science has continued to advance, highschools now teach stuff that is 150 years out of date because they think it's easier on the students.
The main reason is that school is all about creating an illusion of control. If the students don't trust or accept the teachers then they will basically ignore them. The reason they need to do this is because the teachers don't actually have any authority whatsoever. If they tell off the students then the parents may retaliate (assuming they are helicopter parents) and the school will take a greater fall than the student did.
However, they still teach students misinformation as absolute fact. And they continue to use a system to make life appear more controlled than it really is just because the illusion needs that for support.
If people stopped believing they were right about anything, imagine how much calmer things would be. People would double check everything before they commit to it, and information would be treated with much more respect than it does now. There is a lot of stigma against math and science right now because it is "hard". It's not hard, it's actually the closest thing to fact you can possibly get. If it were easy it would be wrong.
Actually, the easier something is to do or remember, the better the odds its wrong. The first words out of an infants mouth tend to be wrong and it takes a few years to get the words right, but try to imagine our society if we never took on the challenge to speak properly.
Or how about how Einstein was bad at math when he was younger? If you've never heard of it, odd are you will think "WOW, how was such a genius bad at math?". The answer is that he wasn't, he was actually the top of his class. There was some gossip back then that he had rectified through news media, but apparently didn't stick as many people still believe he was poor at math. The reason it's easy to remember because it seems... ironic? But the crucial point is that it's easy to remember, and so was probably wrong to begin with.
When you go to school they teach you only using regulated problems that the teachers already have the answers to. While this is good for math and physics it becomes difficult when getting into english or history. And once you leave high school and go to university they typically need to re-teach you math and physics more than the others.
The main reason for re-training is because while in reality math and science has continued to advance, highschools now teach stuff that is 150 years out of date because they think it's easier on the students.
The main reason is that school is all about creating an illusion of control. If the students don't trust or accept the teachers then they will basically ignore them. The reason they need to do this is because the teachers don't actually have any authority whatsoever. If they tell off the students then the parents may retaliate (assuming they are helicopter parents) and the school will take a greater fall than the student did.
However, they still teach students misinformation as absolute fact. And they continue to use a system to make life appear more controlled than it really is just because the illusion needs that for support.
If people stopped believing they were right about anything, imagine how much calmer things would be. People would double check everything before they commit to it, and information would be treated with much more respect than it does now. There is a lot of stigma against math and science right now because it is "hard". It's not hard, it's actually the closest thing to fact you can possibly get. If it were easy it would be wrong.
Actually, the easier something is to do or remember, the better the odds its wrong. The first words out of an infants mouth tend to be wrong and it takes a few years to get the words right, but try to imagine our society if we never took on the challenge to speak properly.
Or how about how Einstein was bad at math when he was younger? If you've never heard of it, odd are you will think "WOW, how was such a genius bad at math?". The answer is that he wasn't, he was actually the top of his class. There was some gossip back then that he had rectified through news media, but apparently didn't stick as many people still believe he was poor at math. The reason it's easy to remember because it seems... ironic? But the crucial point is that it's easy to remember, and so was probably wrong to begin with.
English usually involved questions like "what do you think this character was thinking during this chapter?" So I'd write down what I thought and it would be wrong, "The author actually meant this..." And I'd be like "yeah, but that's not what you asked, if you wanted what the author meant or what the character really though you should have asked that, and not my personal opinion on the matter" I got told off for that a couple of times.
Math is predictive, language is flexible. You can go into space or build a civilization using math, but language is best for capturing the fluidity of the present. However language is so flexible that you can lie as often as you can tell the truth, so a lot of written history is false. It's harder to lie with math.
In college 1+1=X We use X because we don't know what either 1 represents, it could be an inanimate object or a pair of horny bunnies; and thus 1+1 could equal anything depending on context.
From that developed most of mathematics, and some proofs that were amazing given those limitations.
Eventually we developed numerical systems, though because they were developed mostly with commerce in mind the number "0" didn't exist for a long, long time, until it was developed by India. Technically representations of it as a tenth digit existed for longer, but India was the first to use it as a number rather than as a bookend.
I've never actually heard of 1+1=x before, so don't mind me if I'm wary to this new information.
If there were more materials in the equation then it would have been accounted for initially.
Unless this is about whole numbers as applied to individual things, then I see how that would work, but that removes a huge amount of math and starts to become language, which is why the answer is unknowable. Language is terrible at predicting the future, math is not.
It's hard to find a reason to disagree with you, when you're pretty much totally right about this. Math is controlled, Language is existential and interpretive. Its why I personally had issues with Math, because I didn't like definitive thinking, but understanding and comprehension were much more my speed.
You can always bypass 17 steps of a school's IT work with 3 clicks, but noooo it has to be done THEIR WAY. You HAVE to touch type even if you can type faster and neater freehand.
And calling out a geography teacher on him contradicting himself got me in big trouble for being rude!
Our animation teacher has/had an issue with "uh", where he would use it to link together every single thought process as he explained how animation works and what you need to do to create good animations. He's a great guy, but the first month was rough because some of our class couldn't handle it very well. Later they figured it out despite how it was still irritating to them, and basically they felt as bad for him as I did.
So, whenever that kinda thing comes up I feel pretty bad for the person because it tells me that not only are they trying to do their job but they're super worried about screwing up somehow, and the harder they try the worse it gets.
Actually this is one of the things that Amanda would have difficulty with, except it would be physical rather than verbal.