Project in Jeopardy: copyright trolling
12 years ago
Timeline:
the species name, and general design, was scribbled out by me years ago,.. in various OCs, around '06 '07
at firs tit was just the name i cared about. It was never money...
I decided to embark on a craft project to make several designs a reality. it's not difficult to produce these.
http://offbeatr.com/project/kharnak.....ts-15715608432
Right now the project is about to have the legs cut out from right under it...
========
9-1-2012 Twitter preview photos posted (Date/Time please?)
Nemekhs Voted off/out the company 9-3-2012, community run by a "Culture of Fear" as he put it.
========
I know it says in the Submission Agreement, "FA promises to do all that it can, within reason, to protect your information, submissions and intellectual property on the site" So this is my plea. To the community, and my supporters.
========
Original draft sketches
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7841463/ (Journal written and announced.... May 25th, 2012 02:43 PM ) FA itself HAS its own copyright protections...
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/3493862/ Journal around September of 2012 when i first announced my intentions, coincidentally, BD then paid 185$ to copyright the word "Chimera". curious?
(A product they abandoned long long ago and spoke very ill of)
That copyright... was obtained for ONE reason only. This confirms to me, who's been lying, and who's been told what. And who's saying what out the side of their mouths, about me.
http://trademarks.justia.com/857/41.....-85741747.html The copyright page itself. Notice the filing date... eh? see?
Also curious, that Ryan WAITED for the funding phase to be approved, before springing this. Curious? When they had (supposedly) months to do so.
Trying to SEIZE the project funds?! You called it too soon bud!
UPDATE: ***Check the copyright page again*** 2013-09-10 PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED *** all on 9-10-2013, looks like they were scrambling to get on that again.
===
Patent trolling:
APPENDIX:
(Do a fun Search for the rest of the trademarks
http://trademarks.justia.com/owners.....s-inc-1658408/
quite a flurry of activity around that time last year... Ryan's been VERY busy doing all that filing... all
that money. tsk tsk.
some were even abandonded, like these
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/90.....-85690692.html
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/90.....-85690026.html
and even their... precious.... *gasp*
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/18.....-85618599.html
well well well...)
FA's has its OWN copyright protection of submissions!!! the distinctive design and NAME was much older. (submitted April 23rd, 2012 04:04 PM) BEFORE DOXO sketched his remake, before i even registered on BD-forums to submit my idea, BEFORE they ever even started molding and casting!
until.... the September 12th public release of the item
https://twitter.com/bad_dragon/stat.....424256/photo/1
how dare they?
just plain goddamn bad corporate citizenship.
you CANT make people stop existing!
I get it... i'm some weird, mentally unstable, hair-brained invalid who can't possible achieve or produce anything of value.... a washed up artist making pencil smudges .. i've heard it all.
But seriously, WHY do it like this? can you please... please.. give me a break? ...don't be like this.
==========
PS:
Doesn't this seem oddly similar to that episode of SouthPark, about Chef-Aid ?
http://www.southparkstudios.com/ful.....02e14-chef-aid
1:30 in near the beginning.
the species name, and general design, was scribbled out by me years ago,.. in various OCs, around '06 '07
at firs tit was just the name i cared about. It was never money...
I decided to embark on a craft project to make several designs a reality. it's not difficult to produce these.
http://offbeatr.com/project/kharnak.....ts-15715608432
Right now the project is about to have the legs cut out from right under it...
========
9-1-2012 Twitter preview photos posted (Date/Time please?)
Nemekhs Voted off/out the company 9-3-2012, community run by a "Culture of Fear" as he put it.========
I know it says in the Submission Agreement, "FA promises to do all that it can, within reason, to protect your information, submissions and intellectual property on the site" So this is my plea. To the community, and my supporters.
========
Original draft sketches
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7841463/ (Journal written and announced.... May 25th, 2012 02:43 PM ) FA itself HAS its own copyright protections...
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/3493862/ Journal around September of 2012 when i first announced my intentions, coincidentally, BD then paid 185$ to copyright the word "Chimera". curious?
(A product they abandoned long long ago and spoke very ill of)
That copyright... was obtained for ONE reason only. This confirms to me, who's been lying, and who's been told what. And who's saying what out the side of their mouths, about me.
http://trademarks.justia.com/857/41.....-85741747.html The copyright page itself. Notice the filing date... eh? see?
Also curious, that Ryan WAITED for the funding phase to be approved, before springing this. Curious? When they had (supposedly) months to do so.
Trying to SEIZE the project funds?! You called it too soon bud!
UPDATE: ***Check the copyright page again*** 2013-09-10 PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED *** all on 9-10-2013, looks like they were scrambling to get on that again.
===
Patent trolling:
APPENDIX:
(Do a fun Search for the rest of the trademarks
http://trademarks.justia.com/owners.....s-inc-1658408/
quite a flurry of activity around that time last year... Ryan's been VERY busy doing all that filing... all
that money. tsk tsk.
some were even abandonded, like these
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/90.....-85690692.html
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/90.....-85690026.html
and even their... precious.... *gasp*
http://trademarks.justia.com/856/18.....-85618599.html
well well well...)
FA's has its OWN copyright protection of submissions!!! the distinctive design and NAME was much older. (submitted April 23rd, 2012 04:04 PM) BEFORE DOXO sketched his remake, before i even registered on BD-forums to submit my idea, BEFORE they ever even started molding and casting!
until.... the September 12th public release of the item
https://twitter.com/bad_dragon/stat.....424256/photo/1
how dare they?
just plain goddamn bad corporate citizenship.
you CANT make people stop existing!
I get it... i'm some weird, mentally unstable, hair-brained invalid who can't possible achieve or produce anything of value.... a washed up artist making pencil smudges .. i've heard it all.
But seriously, WHY do it like this? can you please... please.. give me a break? ...don't be like this.
==========
PS:
Doesn't this seem oddly similar to that episode of SouthPark, about Chef-Aid ?
http://www.southparkstudios.com/ful.....02e14-chef-aid
1:30 in near the beginning.
FA+

You got my best wishes mate, even though I can't do anything to help. If there's any petitions need signing, hit me up, you've got a supporter in me. Just make sure not to go down the same slimey path they did.
You can of course take your chance in court against BD because obviously their sculpt is derived work. But the problem is, at best you might be able to get a cease and desist order unless you did pay the fee to have the design registered with the copyright office. Most artists do not realize that while copyright is automatic, registration is still required for a lawsuit in general.
As far as their "Chimera" product goes it does appear they were granted it by the government for use on products that are adult stimulation aids.
To be honest given how similar the design is and the timing of it, it does seem like a very shady business practice on part of BD. I'm not sure what FA will do about it given how buddy buddy the admins are with the owners of BD and FA's admins have a long standing history of applying the rules non-objectively. You might have some grounds under the DMCA of course but all of this you will honestly need to consult with an actual lawyer with.
But seriously, and I mean this in a very sincere so not mocking way but do NOT post concept art on the internet of product you intend to or may make. I mean that's the main reason why concept artists have to sign non disclosure agreements with their employer when working on a project for this very reason. Bear in mind however anything you submit to BD for consideration there is very little stopping them from taking the design and revising it and claiming it as their own. But just how similar it looks to your concept, it might actually qualify as a copyright violation. This one reason as well... register your copyright, particularly on product you send in for consideration. Most won't do this because of the simple fact they get obviously excited to possibly have one of their designs be commercially produced.
Another thing to keep in mind too which I was reading someone talk about BD having a board of directors but to put it in perspective BD is not in anyway a large operation. There's like 5 people that own it and if they do have other employees, that count is most likely extremely low. It's more like a small mom and pop style "factory" from what I've been told by those that have been in it. Also, this isn't the first time they've taken some "inspiration" from other sources. I had to actually refer the site to our legal team for review when I worked at Amazon because if you look at certain elements on their page such as the "Hello, sign in..." etc etc and "Where's my Stuff?" was quite similar to elements of our site. Clearly the company didn't pursue the matter much which is fine, their call. I mean there's scams that corporate is aware of and doesn't even seem to pursue. However just shows that the BD won't hesitate to cherry pick design elements it likes and tweak them around.
In any event from what I did read through the BD forums link it seems like some waves were created and you didn't argue your case properly though I will not dismiss the possibility of white knighting is a basis behind it because at the end of the day the designs are very much similar. I can't tell however if you submitted this thing in to their labs for consideration or if this was something you were going to undertake yourself to build because it kinda seems like a submission gone foul then you decided to build it yourself.
Stuff like this does get messy and I know quite a bit about copyrights but I'm no substitute for an experienced lawyer if you really do want to take it that far. But again to reiterate, if anything just do not post your concepts publicly or at the very least file for the copyright and if you do decide to manufacture, for the love of god patent it asap. When you invent a design you intend to produce, patent it before you show it off. That's the all around safest and surefire way you have absolute legal recourse available to you in case something like this comes up.
But while it's frustrating to see your design basically ripped off, keeping calm and professional is actually quite critical. People have this habit of tuning out of the root of the problem, even if legit, and become quite defensive if someone's raging around or being very much passive aggressive about it. With customers I had to handle, irate ones were just an everyday thing. People didn't like what I told them because a policy they didn't like applied to them. They raged and I more or less started fiddling about with things at my desk and tuned out and reverted to a more cookie cutter type argument "I understand your frustration and I would be pretty upset as well if I were the type to keep my Kindle in my back pocket and sat down on it. But it's a thin electronic device with a small layer of glass that will break when a certain amount of pressure is applied. Sitting on the device is not covered under warranty but my options to you I've explained earlier are at your disposal." All while they are ranting in my ear about how they will get a lawyer and sue and that they don't want a discount on a new one, they want a free one, etc.
One thing I can't stand are people who are so thick that they think a lawyer will somehow get them out of something that's clearly not covered under the warranty nor do I like being interrupted while I'm speaking. But, part of the job was taking it. I swear if I had a buck for every customer I wanted to say "Fuck you!" to, realistically I'd have around 50-60 grand. Just do your best to keep your cool when things go sour. Reputation is still a factor in the furry community. If Amazon developed a reputation for telling it's customers to fuck off when someone called to complain, I have no doubts there would be a significant number of people shopping elsewhere on principle alone for that very reason, regardless of how cheap something may be or how cool a device they built is. Say you create a different design that people are into, your sales will likely suffer to some degree simply by having a bad reputation.
I do agree that from what I've seen so far, the designs are just far too similar and I'm not sure if the changes are enough to warrant a new copyright given that the changes can only retain 20% of the original to qualify as a new copyright and is not considered derivative. But an 'attitude' won't help your cause either and won't generally keep people open minded. They'll just assume you're being an asshole and dismiss you as such even if you have a very very valid claim. It's sad but annoyingly that's how human society works out. :/
but.. you actually DO make good valid points, And show good understanding, and real grasp of the whole thing. including, reading the FULL context of the BD forums discussions. Thank you. tremendously for that.
---
go fuckin figure... (the CEO's) role models are Thomas Edison, and P.T. Barnum(the art of making money).
I'm in no way comparing myself to Nikola Tesla... but i have a fondness for the whole backstory on him.
BD forums... is... NO .. place to argue. It's an Orwellian information control racket.
"if you want to know who's in charge... who are you not allowed to criticize?" -Voltaire
Fact is... i UNDERSTAND the root essence of capitalism.. seduction.. i understand it's the name of the game... people have a RIGHT to make money.. and people have a RIGHT to protect their money..... BUT!!! if it's obtained in a shitty scheissty underhanded way... there are societal correction mechanisms, like laws... BUT.... if if these fair practices fail.... society does has other last resorts too.... That being, public opinion and information.
=====
so yeah.... it may be their Attorney, Leo Pruett will have a good explanation and rebuttal to my points.... and my project is completely Voided.. i'll be set back a bit.
i'm still alive... i'm still here. I may be set back for years and years. but i'll be here for a long time.
====
Thank you lex for understanding.
But yeah, there's a level of politics in play here and honestly to me it boils down to legality vs ethics. The law MIGHT be fully on their side in this but regardless of that were their actions ethical? Not in my opinion. When I look at the two designs with yours having the older date to it I mean to me it just looks like a slightly modified knock off, like what they do in China with those cheap knock offs of popular IPs you tend to find in dollar stores or flea markets.
That being said, the furry fandom is heavily political in their own way. You have here a fairly large provider of 'unique' adult entertainment devices who has built up a very decent brand name for themselves even to the point of non-furries buying in. That's fine and dandy but just for me on this whole issue when I see two designs remarkably similar nor am I seeing any credit to you as the designer of this new Chimera product, it just to me appears that it's a ripped off design.
The ironic thing about lawyers is ethics doesn't always come into play. The law isn't so cut and dry and honorable as people tend to presume it is. In the end it really is just a game of who can win what argument and here I see a small corporation vs an individual and very odd timing on their trademark registration date. Some of the people on those forums really do white-knight the company much like the adult artist furry artist who 'can do no wrong' or the whining 'popufur' who is mopy because someone hurt their feelings because they were called out on some bullshit and winds up getting an admin to have that person suspended because the comment was a 'call out'. It's all just.. I don't know. There's too many cliquey people in this fandom. Too quick to take a side of the popular vs the obscure or unpopular. You may have recourse on a copyright claim since yours does appear to be the older one and thus first one under protections. Meaning you can keep the design but sell it under a different name and keep your design or consult with a lawyer about getting some sort of cease and desist order on their current Chimera 2 product due to it appearing to be derived work. Probably won't be able to get monetary damages unless you registered the design with the copyright office, but the default copyright does at least typically get you a cease and desist.
In any event, just don't let this one thing hold ya back. It's all..legal crap and BD I have a feeling has a collective overinflated set of egos now that they're well established. I mean look at the admin drama that happens on this website alone because it is the 'go to' site for furry art and the most popular. BD is no exception. So give them some serious competition. Keep your image sharp and reputation clean. You can even go through the forums and see what BD is NOT doing that their customers want... and then do it yourself, after of course ensuring the legal crap is good to go for it. I'd honestly love to see BD get a run for it's money. When a company has a monopoly, they become VERY complacent and a little more pricy.
-right
-right
-right, and SunTzu indeed would advize one to simply be more cautious and elusive in this case.... there's nothing wrong with retreating and regrouping.
- yes, i wanted to base my presence, project and efforts, to fill the Niches they leave out... #1 of all, is PRICE. #2 redundant designs #3 attitude and image #4 real feeling of care for the craft, and genuine Customer relations..... my time at DirecTV for businesses taught me well. VERY well, skills even Doctors just don't have.
- it's not a Monopoly, but an Oligopoly. There's other Big players out there. Zetapaws, Exotic-erotics, etc.
But in Marketing.... the things that Oligopolies FEAR... is Price Wars, suitable alternatives, and educated customer base. I wanted to provide that remedy.
But yeah I think adult toys in general are just way too expensive as is and BD stuff in general is still just as spendy as buying a common dildo from a sex store. So basically you are seeking to do with the adult products market what I seek to do with the art market where you have small time artists with big time artist egos and obsession over copyright control to the level of dictating what gallery site someone can and cannot upload to. As well as comparing the value of the rights to the work to those of actual professional grade artists that work in the industry. Not to mention also ensuring I'm reliable to the point they're not waiting months for a simple piece... or for that long at all regardless. I've had good business sense for quite a while but my time with Amazon definitely did refine it with proof in my EDR metric there. I'm the guy that proved to an operations manager that in chat support associates need to be allowed to use emoticons in customer interactions and proper use of the exclamation mark to generate a positive and exciting tone where appropriate.
It was policy to not use them and in doing so usually meant some form of disciplinary action. So, people generally didn't use them. Their EDR goal in retail chat alone was 10%. So basically it was a goal for 10 people out of every 100 to say NO on those surveys we had to email out. After I made my case and was given an 'exception' to prove my point is valid and get the data to back it up, EDR in Kindle Chat was constantly under the 3% mark, similar to the phone support goal. Then once it became policy, the EDR goal in retail chat dropped from 10% to 3.5% just with that one change because everyone was now getting under 3% EDR each week with only a few going over goal vs the usual 9-13%.
So yeah, I know business and customer satisfaction. Even if I don't generally like dealing with irate people period where some actually enjoy the challenge of it. Crazy. But anyway, give them a run for their money. Because price is one factor but the biggest issue with Zetapaws and BD... time. Took nearly 3 weeks just to get their sample chips and a bottle of cumlube. :P and i live on the same side of the country! Arizona is not that far from WA state overall.
....sheeeez
On a side, Nemekh's complaints were directed at someone else in the company.
Trademarks protect names when applied to specific product categories, the intention is to stop one company 'cashing in' on the brand identity of another.
Copyrights protect expressions of ideas that are not generic, the intention is to allow authors and artists the ability to control distribution of their works so they can earn an income and be encouraged to produce more.
Patents protect inventions, the idea is to encourage research and development by rewarding people for coming up with useful ideas and products.
Some types of protections (particularly patents) can be overturned if there is evidence of prior art.
...I'm not sure what FA will do about it given how buddy buddy the admins are with the owners of BD and FA's admins have a long standing history of applying the rules non-objectively. You might have some grounds under the DMCA of course but all of this you will honestly need to consult with an actual lawyer with.
Why would FA do anything at all, there's this unhealthy assumption that FA is tasked with enforcing the judgements from the Court of Public Opinion. There is also no "buddy buddy" relationship between FA and Bad Dragon, (they are also indirect competitors) but I cannot speak for personal relationships between respective staff members.
Also, this isn't the first time they've taken some "inspiration" from other sources. I had to actually refer the site to our legal team for review when I worked at Amazon because if you look at certain elements on their page such as the "Hello, sign in..." etc etc and "Where's my Stuff?" was quite similar to elements of our site. Clearly the company didn't pursue the matter much which is fine, their call. I mean there's scams that corporate is aware of and doesn't even seem to pursue. However just shows that the BD won't hesitate to cherry pick design elements it likes and tweak them around.
No moreso than one can claim that Nokia's Lumia handset was ripped off by the HTC One, though clearly the design elements are similar between devices no? On a tangent, Amazon is probably the worst source of inspiration to use when designing a shopping cart, it's not exactly a topper in the User Experience charts.
You do make good points but this whole affair is horribly one-sided, with Kharnak expressing particular bias and bitterness that belies any kind of logical points. Pleading to the masses and stirring shit on a furry art site instead of professionally addressing the BD staff (and replying to such suggestions with the figurative middle finger) is hardly the basis of productively seeking redress for perceived slights.
This is an issue that should have stayed between him and them until all rational avenues had been exhausted, if he has tried to discuss this issue with them and they gave him the figurative finger then that's bad form on their part making this a reasonable course of last resort.
This brings me to the present in why I support you. I haven't pledged anything (due to money issues), but when I can I will or at least buy something in the future from you after it's all started. You have a bit more realistic and interesting designs for sure as well as what you have proposed in your Offbeatr updates has my interests perked. So hopefully after this legal stupidity is said and done, things can get back on track and you can finally show BD that they are missing out on something really good with you and instead of making an enemy, they should have a friend. Especially in a marketplace that is very VERY limited and just now really booming.
i actually DO have a mutually beneficial proposition actually...
Jan's ALL about the money. I am not. I NEVER was, even from the beginning.
I'm proposing to their Attorney, that i sign a contract, where for a length of time (1 to 3 years) I am obligated to turn over all profit derived from "toy formerly known as the Chimera", as a tribute to them. AND... all i want is a brief mention(in a NON-disparaging way) in the toy's current page. A VERY simple HTML edit job... It's an easy solution, and turns this into an Oppurtunity.
Damn good idea i say myself.
They've been quiet now... i take that as them possibly considering it. Makes a LOT more sense, and costs less than these Attorney retainer fees... pffff X3
The hentai tits, as i called them, are basically breast forms, but with more interesting features than a human's.... slug nipples(really old submission) crank handle teets, whereby using the same techniques, there would be a chamber that can store liquid, and be squeezed out by hand, or sucked on.
I've seen some disturbing RL anime porn, these girl with huge tits, just shooting milk everywhere.
But these Hentai Tits, are a more practical and functional. (But, i try to avoid "vaporware". Apple used to blab on and on about crap that may never come to fruition) Right now i only give out the access PIN to private photos on my Photobucket.
I WANT people to have my creations, without having to blow half a good paycheck to get 7$ worth of silicone that flops around before you can even manage to shove it in.....
I'm not comparing myself to Mr.Rogers... BUT... I too WANT to inspire interest, curiosity... imagination, in how things are done, manufactured, etc.
Right now i'm just waiting for some response.... still, so far nothing XD I speculate, the Attorney is floored by my solution. They were hoping that i was STUPID enough to not read the whole damn copyright statute, and actual coverage it applies to. XD!!! they didn't even FUCKING read the whole statute..... pffffff So back the FFFFFUCK off about my Lube name... in fact, since "Cum Lube" was abandoned.... (psst check this out) how about **I** name it that?! eh? dafuk they gonna do?
I'm still waiting for FA here, to get to me on how to file a DMCA, so that this one would supersede the current one obtained last year. I contest that the copyright itself was ILL-gotten, and wrongfully obtained.
Vegas Odds: 1. they're regrouping, looking for the upper hand in fucking me up since some candles some other day, any compromise they see as a sign of weakness. But either way.......... if my project is nulled and voided out... it will become a kind of Martyr.
2.: best case scenario, we both get what we want, with profit sharing, and... yes, Length. rough stabs, like .... 3 years of profit sharing... whichever comes first"
"For those of you interested in Bad Dragon Labs, we've now expanded the program to allow for the submission of penetrable designs! Think you have what it takes to create a new penetrable to join the ranks of Mary, Natascha, and Janine? Show the community your idea! We'll be expanding our Submission guidelines with more information about this change very soon. Head on over to Bad Dragon Labs for more information!"
SOOOO it looks like they are trying to step on more of someone's toes. Not trying to create a flame war or anything, but I just wanted to point that little gem out given the circumstances. Either way like I said this started out over 1 silly toy that could easily be renamed, removed, or even better as you have suggested- sold with profits going to them anyways. Like a Bad Dragon Exclusive or something lol. Though if "Chimera" is a problem, see with their attorney and find out if "Chimera" is truly trademarked to them and if so, screw them over by calling yours "Chymera" or something XD (unless they have spelling trademarked for every variation. Then if that's the case? We know where they are blowing money out at seeing they would need to pay copyright for every spelling for every toy which wouldn't be financially sound)
Not just do you offer a variety of ideas, but you also offer something that is more affordable with better quality. Remember my story about the toy that came discolored? Yeah they now pissed me off even more with a release of a new toy that has freakin highlights and other nifty features that I knew were possible, but they were just too stupid and lazy to admit that they screwed up on my order. Oh well, least I am able to talk to the creator (referring to you) on a neutral or friendly ground/terms instead of going through some middle man that doesn't know what in the world they are doing.
Fleshlight is better, simply for having an outside bracing. but that takes assembly and more complex molding. All other toys, are simple, mix-pour-wait-ChaChing$ repeat. (like those machines at a zoo, you put in 1$ and it makes a wax animal model mold for you on the spot.... same business model if you think about it)
and... Dicks do NOT bend into an S shape on insertion... or bend at all.
i've seen some pretty funny perfume knock-offs too, but i still don't want to do anything like that. Just looks a little shady, and... one should avoid being in someone's shadow, but rather shine in their own way. there are many Niches. sorely unsatisfied.
(on toypics... notice that (he) never ever cums from his own toys...)
Yeah I have noticed that on Toypics as well; almost like he doesn't even want to use them, but just showing what you can do with them just to get money x.x.
Sorry to hear about that message from Offbeatr, but its good to take care of friends, family, and loved ones too. Hopefully during the down time you can come up with some more ideas that would supersede BD and become even more original than ever before because I really REALLY want to see this happen.
What we have here is a failure on your part to understand the difference between patent and trademark.
1) Bad Dragon filed for a Trademark on the term "Chimera" for the statements("category") of "Adult sexual stimulation aids"
2) A trademark is not a patent
3) In the US, priority of trademarks are given to use based scenarios first. Here's a scenario similar to your own, if one person has concept art and no product and the second person has the product ready, the person with the product ready would be granted the trademark.
4) Trademark has nothing to do with copyright
I don't see what the problem is here. They came out with the product first with the name "Chimera", you don't have any ready product. You don't have a leg to stand on in this situation.
Now, seeing as you're comparing your own concept art to the Bad Dragon Chimera, there's nothing wrong here. Copyright protects a product from being a carbon copy, but case law has stood if a person designs a similar looking product then copyright law doesn't apply since the product is a different design from the other person's design.
To be clear, the following are three different things:
patents
copyright
trademark
I'd recommend you perform research on each of these terms and learn the difference.
we know he was the only one who didn't deserve it.
it never happens to those who really do. damndest irony
(Not getting into the overarching factors that went into why it was written in the first place; just wanted to give you a thumbs-up.)
re-enable your page, it looks way too shady to keep it closed. you have no reason to defend or give any advice either way.
If you created a product named Chimera before bad dragon, then get a lawyer and fight their trademark application. You're doing nothing productive but whining, as BD is in their legal right to file for a trademark. Once their application is granted though, you'd be out of luck.
You should challenge the trademark application, if you have the resources.
Copyright protects expressions, I write a computer program and sell copies. I can take action against people that distribute it without my permission but I cannot take action against someone that creates a work-alike clone since my rights apply only to the source code and the compiled output of that. Someone who implements the same features and makes the product look and feel like mine has under the law created a new work and I have no claim over it.
Similarly as far as I know, you cannot copyright a 'character' creation but an artist who draws it holds a copyright to their artwork and while you might 'own' the character you cannot apply for any protection on it under current copyright law. So I do not know if even Bad Dragon can 'protect' the design and prevent someone else producing a similar one.
i.e. Apple having a trademark on iPhone so nobody else in the US can use the term iPhone for a cellular device.
it's funny how the definitions and coverage are Broad & Narrow when convenient.
i'm afraid, you're quite right. You are. I understand. I got my back into the wall, and i'm about to get crushed through the wall now. I got nothing. I can't contest it. The timing is cruel genius. Normally i'd toast it, but this turns me off so horribly of the whole Machiavellianism thing...
==
PS: this attorney Leo Pruett had a hand in the takeover and merger of Phelps Dodge, a huge mining corp in AZ. very very checkered history on that, anti-union, etc. etc.
fucking dildos.
wow this is silly.
could be cars, cookies, cellphones, all the same.
This just doesn't come across well. :(
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/8883391/ (9-21-2012) The time line, does not lie. 6 days later, they filed.
like what happened to Runa ;3 sweet Schadenfreude.
but you're british, so you do not count.
you're not supposed to be commenting when you're blocked.
I suppose the irony of being American and therefore without any claim to American ethnic purity (unless you're a pureblooded native American) is lost somewhere.
um, why not
I still never understood why as a guy trying to set up a [legit?] business, you used to and still do troll people to the extent you do.
I can hear Jan "wutdafook gais, just fookin block him, he can't fookin do anythin', let him sit there stewin in his own juices, fookin rage poostin ssssspecky wee gadge, we're creamin the crop laddies!!!"
=============
they deleted my tickets, with no answer. I take that as guilt.
They did NOT have a marketable specimen last year in September.
one way or another, David and/or Ryan needs to divulge, WHEN the working marketable product came into existence. Because trying to gain a trademark for competitive advantage, and timing a release for that, is a crime in itself. let alone trying to seize the project funds.
BD's Legal team... is... NOT... a "team".. it's just one old guy who got lucky with a (Mining company) merger, and does a simple copy-paste job of registering ***** fictitious ****'s.
A C&D letter, is an opinon.
Lar, please.....
it's time to clear the air. it's NOT money i want!!!!!!! they dont have to spend 375$ on EVERY trademarked name.
all i want, is 4 simple words, added to this page
http://bad-dragon.com/products/chimera
4 very simple words. let me know when they're curious... it's nothing bad. and this is ALL finished. done. i promise.
Also, can't you just change the name of your design?
who gave anyone that idea?
His acceptance and approval is not my life goal.