Mentoring/Partnership Program
12 years ago
General
Besides the anthology, one of the ideas that I had for the guild that I believed to be of great value was a mentoring program. The idea didn't get a lot of attention when I posted about it on the forums about a month ago, but I feel like it's something we should really look into.
I'm looking to gather writers of all skill levels and develop a program in which these writers will work together. The main purpose of the program is to have the more experienced writers help less experienced and confused ones, but I'm not opposed to two writers of similar skill level working together, though preferably one has been published and one hasn't been.
If I can get a bit more interested generated with this, I'd like to start this program up fairly soon; as soon as next month. Obviously the pair would work together whenever one has a story out that they'd like the other to look over, so there's not really a set schedule of when the mentors would need to do anything. The mentors should be open to answer questions from their mentee on a somewhat consistent basis, though the needs would obviously depend on the person.
My thoughts right now are that after we get a pool, the mentors can go through and check out who they would like to work with, maybe based off of a contrast in writing styles, a relationship in which both can learn from each other, or a parallel writing style, one which more experienced writers can guide the less experienced.
This is the sort of program that'd really display the mission statement of the FWG, to support, inform, elevate and promote quality writing and writers of anthropomorphic fiction.
What are your guys' thoughts?
I'm looking to gather writers of all skill levels and develop a program in which these writers will work together. The main purpose of the program is to have the more experienced writers help less experienced and confused ones, but I'm not opposed to two writers of similar skill level working together, though preferably one has been published and one hasn't been.
If I can get a bit more interested generated with this, I'd like to start this program up fairly soon; as soon as next month. Obviously the pair would work together whenever one has a story out that they'd like the other to look over, so there's not really a set schedule of when the mentors would need to do anything. The mentors should be open to answer questions from their mentee on a somewhat consistent basis, though the needs would obviously depend on the person.
My thoughts right now are that after we get a pool, the mentors can go through and check out who they would like to work with, maybe based off of a contrast in writing styles, a relationship in which both can learn from each other, or a parallel writing style, one which more experienced writers can guide the less experienced.
This is the sort of program that'd really display the mission statement of the FWG, to support, inform, elevate and promote quality writing and writers of anthropomorphic fiction.
What are your guys' thoughts?
FA+

Admittedly, not everyone who wants to write is that clueless, but I feel like somehow I have ended up with more than my share.
Oh, and I also tend to write a lot of F/F adult stuff.
Sorry, I probably came across as really picky or something, I just wanted to be as honest about myself as possible.
And the truth is most of the professional writers have a lot on their plate, and their time is valuable.
I think this initiative will be great for getting starting writers past their first hurdle or two, but there's going to be a big void in that long, long road between "just starting" and "people regularly pay money for your words".
And from my point on that spectrum, I'd rather be spending my very limited spare time reading and mentoring folks who've come most of that way already. If I'm spending more time critiquing spelling and grammar than I am dialogue styles or thematic elements expressed, then it's going to be a bad use of my time.
So, I guess... put me down as being a volunteer for "polisher". If your story is already print-worthy or close to it, and you want that extra oomph or a detailed eye? I can do that. I'll leave the big red pen circles to editors though. :)
I'll add you per your specific requests. You'd probably benefit from the partnership option, basically sticking another writer around your level with you to go over what you notice in each other's work. Obviously to be able to learn from a highly experienced and established author is always a plus, but help is help!
That's me writing.
lol
Joking aside, it's a good idea. Luckily for me I've already got a couple of people looking over my proverbial shoulder, whether I want them to or not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0HX4a5P8eE
I remember that commercial so well. Right before the housing crash of 2008. It's quite ironic.
Before you can mentor someone I think this should always be remembered. Not even a mentor is perfect, I fear that with such a title some may let it go to their heads.
Also, you'd have to weed through the Nazi's of the writing community to find good mentors. >.<
I always offer advice to other writers regardless of being a volunteer. Encouraging writers to write on is a fun past time of mine. Many a time I've had my mind blown with the creativity of some of the new faces here on FA. They did lack grammar and punctuation skills but the idea was still there. It's even better when they accept advice and learn from what you tell them. <3
If anyone wants me to look over anything and give my thoughts I am always open for such. Though I am brutally honest; I keep a friendly tone at all times and I certainly love seeing new idea's take shape. If you can paint a picture in my mind, I would love to help you go as far as you want. ^.=.^
Thanks for the opportunity to help out. <3
But I also can add a few words of wisdom as far as grammar and not using cliched plots. :D
1) You could end up in a blind-leading-the-blind situation. Some Dunning-Kruger-afflicted amateur who believes himself to be enormously capable and goes on to seriously misguide his "apprentice." I've seen loads of frankly terrible advice given out at panels at cons. I can't imagine what would stop that from happening here.
2) There's not really any motivation for the mentor. The mentored get something out of it, because they get criticism and advice, etc. The mentor, however, gets only the ego boost of being named a "mentor" and the steadily diminishing satisfaction of helping another person. If I have spare time, I'm dedicating it to writing, editing, and the various other tasks related to publication. I just plain haven't got the time to walk someone else through his paces. I have a suspicion that those volunteering to be mentors are seriously underestimating the amount of time and work it really takes to read and provide a deep, considered, meaningful critique. Even if a mentor is willing at the start, give it a few months, and it's kind of a thankless job.
There's a reason that nearly every webpage offering advice on forming a writer's group suggests trying to find people around the same skill level. A group of peers who are willing to collectively read each other's work is far more likely to succeed. For one thing, the benefit of doing all that work is mutual--you're working hard to critique someone else's writing, sure, but you know that they're going to do the same for you in a few weeks. Secondly, you're getting multiple perspectives on your writing instead of just one, and that's vital.
2) I understand what you're saying, and I have two responses of my own.
The first - As I mentioned above, anyone can learn from anyone. Whether I put two mid-level writers together with clashing styles who can help fill in the gaps the other has or if I put a novice writer with an experienced writer, there will always be learning to had. Anyone who doesn't think so falls under that 'elitist' category that I'm trying to help the guild avoid.
The second - Why does there need to be a big payoff? Whatever happened to doing good? When you walk in a cancer foundation walk-a-thon, do you expect to be rewarded for your time and effort? When someone takes a lot of time and effort to write a story to post online for free, do they expect everyone that reads it to page an entrance fee? No. The whole point of the guild is to help develop current and new talent. If we aren't doing that then there's frankly no reason for the guild to exist.
Whoever signs up to do this will need to put some work in, sure. We also aren't talking about professional writing coaches here. We're talking about one writer mentioning a couple tips to another. I don't expect a term paper out of each mentor on each story they look at. I expect a few bullet points on what can be improved with some explanation.
I agree that we can do a lot with writers at the same level helping each other. That's where the 'partnership' part of this comes into play. Writers working with those along there own level, perhaps with a contrasting style or weakness to someone else's strength. We're obviously not going to know what kinds of pairings we can have until we gauge the interest level first.
I'm sorry if that's hurtful, but let's take this to a different level. Reducto ad absurdum.
You cannot tell me that Stephen King is on the same talent level as myself. He is worlds above me in talent and in execution. I acknowledge this because it is reality.
You may subjectively enjoy my work, or the work of another writer, more than King's. That's perfectly valid. But it is very possible to objectively judge the quality of writing in an academic sense.
Well for one thing, you get a captive beta-reader. Even if the mentee is not great with editing, it's another pair of eyes on your piece that can find mistakes or make observations. Every set of eyes help.
Because I know that I'm not going to mentor someone if they're not willing to give back (in this case, reading my stuff). Quid pro quo is only fair.
To me, criticism is empty if it doesn't mention someone's particular victories in the particular work being critiqued.
I think all of your points are valid and worthy of discussion. Please join us at http://www.anthroaquatic.com/forum/index.php so that we may further discuss the particulars of your situation. Best wishes.
However, the guild does not directly say that Spanish writers are excluded. The qualifications are still the same: you either need to have one published work in a paying furry venue or two published worked in a non-paying, but exclusive furry venue (basically you need to submit something and have it be accepted).
I honestly am not sure if any of the publishers have been sent any Spanish/non-English items. Something you'd obviously have to talk with them about. You could have the first published Spanish furry novel in a paying venue, though! So that's a goal for you.
Just because each writer will have a mentor/partner doesn't mean they still can't ask another for advice. A third opinion isn't always a bad idea.
Then maybe some of these people have social lives.
I'd also like to think that the mentors/mentees would talk more than once every two weeks. I imagine a lot of the communication would be by email, sending links to stories and asking for feedback, something that would get rather cumbersome if each member of the group consistently had to submit replies to multiple other people.
We can try to plan 'double dates', if you will. Two mentoring pairs have a conference and discuss each other's work. That would obviously plan on the ability of each pair, however.
In any case, regardless of how you decide to set things up I'd be happy to get involved.
Glad you're willing to be involved!
Added to Mentor.
Of course, with the above expectation of a payoff, then that person should not expect a large influx of growing talent. If those of us that came before hoard our knowledge, then every person must start from bare scratch. This is not what the itnernet, schools, and so on are based on.
I have no idea of what use I'd be.
Other than the fact that I am seriously considering reviewing some of the furry books I have read that were especially bad, though I fear fan reprisal.
This is the problem that I tend to see with the 'top level' in the furry community, not just in writing but in art as well. It seems that the more prolific/talented the person, the less time they seem to have to help. I know that some furs do all of their work on top of a full-time job, but I like to use myself as an example. I work a full-time job. Granted right now my job is so dead that I work on half of my editing/FWG stuff at work, but it isn't always like that. That just allows me to take on something as big as the FWG while still working on other things.
Never be afraid of fan reprisal when doing a review. As long as your points are justified and not 'this book is bad so me no likey' then you don't have to listen to a word the fans say. It's like when a huge fan of Nora Robertson/JD Robb gets upset at someone because they pointed out a few really bad mistakes that rather stop the flow of the book. Every book has mistakes; that's why I tend to skim-read most stuff I actually read (curse of being an editor) because I'll see those mistakes and get hung up on them. Does my own writing have mistakes? Sure. Does this post? Probably. People need to get over thinking that their favorite writer's book is perfect, because in no way, shape, or form is it perfect.
I have a full time job too, of course, I have to focus all my attention there just to make sure I don't fall behind. For a good long while I couldn't wait to get home and start typing, but the pull isn't as strong as it used to be. I know traditionally I haven't been all that good about sticking to things I'm supposed to do. Character flaw, I guess.
Well, I know that I can write a review, but of course the question is if I can do it without letting my emotions color my assessment. I'd have to pull them off my shelves and skim them.
I know that a big problem in the furry community is that a good part of the writers are really, really bad. Add to that a good number of them write just for fun, and thus react unpredictably to criticism (myself included), and then there are folks that will be like, 'it's a good book, that's all I care about' and that'll be that to them. Of course, I don't suppose I can convince everyone, but I do think I'd like to say what I feel, though one of the things that has held me back is the writer is a friend. Of course, IMHO, and I hold myself to this standard as well, when you start accepting payment for your work, the safety net disappears are you are subject to criticism.
Who knows? Maybe working with another writer will help get you inspired again.
I'd be hoping that the writers who both write for fun and don't care about improving would not volunteer for this. Everyone whose in this program should either have a desire to improve or a desire to help others improve. Those that respond harshly to constructive criticism and feedback shouldn't be here. On the other side, those that find that deconstructive criticism and harshly-written feedback probably shouldn't be mentors. It's really about helping each other; not putting each other down.
Though the review I'm talking about would have nothing to do with the mentoring, it was some books I read, some of which were enjoyable to me and others that honestly were really not so good with IMHO obvious things like one dimensional characters, convenient plot twists.... Contradictions in logic...
Just jumping in here. >^_^< It does get kind of awkward with furry writers being a small group and there being various circles of friends (or cliques, if I'm being uncharitable), and being worried that the person isn't going to want to talk to you ever again if you say something negative about their work. I know of at least one furry writer who won't review for that reason, and there may be more. I'm sure there have been horror stories with people overreacting, much the same way writers do to well-meant crits on FA and such. It's an odd situation anyway, with the fandom sort of dissolving any boundaries between creators and consumers and critics.
I would say, though, that as long as the review is fair -- in other words, you're pointing out both strengths and weaknesses, and not being sarcastic or snarky -- I think most of the published writers in the fandom are mature and professional enough to understand that it's not personal. I think in some ways the tone of the review matters more than the content. And if they're not mature and professional enough to deal with it, then you know who not to review again. Or, if you're really worried about your relationship with this person, I suppose another idea would be to run the review by them privately first and ask if they'd be okay with you posting it. (And if you can't say at least something positive about the book, then I wouldn't risk the review or the relationship.)
Of course, for all I know, you could be talking about my book. And if you are talking about my book, then I'll tell you straight out, I'd much rather have a balanced review (or even a somewhat negative one) than no review at all just because the friend is concerned about hurting my feelings. Yeah, I'm human, I'd love glowing reviews, but to me things like snark and almost mocking the work are what truly hurt, far more than fair criticism.
I suppose that I should be able to manage to be fair, though I know my overall assessment will not be positive (not that I hated the books, but they clearly needed more work before publication), which incidentally was self published.
I know that there's the 'if you can't say something nice' train of thought, but honestly that never works on the internet that I've ever seen. I just feel like if no one ever tells you you've got toilet paper on your butt, you'll never pull it off and figure that out. I normally don't criticize most, even when it's deserved, but in this case the person has mostly been their own editor as far as I know and as such in my opinion has not advanced from book to book at all. I guess on one hand it isn't my place to judge, but if I never say anything... I suppose as long as I keep emotion out if it, it's within reason.
And I'm not talking about your book, in this case, but I will review it.
(And if you need an electronic copy of mine to practice on, just drop me a line here. Offer also good for anyone else reading this who's willing to write a review.) >^_^<
The initial pairings are more for getting the ball rolling, so to speak. They can always be tweaked.
Er, I guess what I'm trying to say is I'm in.
Do I have a cloud of admirers who flock to every journal I make? Do I have enough watches to have contests about "Watcher number X000 gets a free doohickey!" No, I don't. So I probably have some things to learn. :D
But seriously, it's hard to portray myself as established or talented when I've been too timid to even try "getting out there", submitting things to anthologies and publications. It's safer to stay at an amateur level.
I can also give constructive criticism as well, but I wouldn't consider myself mentor material just yet.
I think as far as tutelage is considered, I'm mostly in-between. Probably want to put me in that halfway group.
I'll add you and send you the questionnaire via note. You'll be getting it in the next minute or two.