FA+
Shop
Bart Simpson is a person; Man convicted of child porn
17 years ago
Sometimes I hate this country. I wish I was making this shit up.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/1.....supreme_court/
Let me just emphasise: No child was ever involved. And yet this poor bastard now has a child porn conviction on his record. What a wank.
I've said before that it's likely some of the images on this site are technically "Child Porn" in this country. Australia's censorship laws are so draconian and stupid, and only poised to get worse under the current government.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/1.....supreme_court/
Let me just emphasise: No child was ever involved. And yet this poor bastard now has a child porn conviction on his record. What a wank.
I've said before that it's likely some of the images on this site are technically "Child Porn" in this country. Australia's censorship laws are so draconian and stupid, and only poised to get worse under the current government.
Here in the US, Congress has tried to pass such laws, but the US Supreme Court has voided them for violating our First Amendment. Even meticulously accurate computer generated images of children engaging in sex are protected. If there was no real child involved, there is no crime. We still have our guns, too, thanks to our Second Amendment - lots of guns...
What if your going and looking for porn, and firefox happens to download some pics of underage kids...
Is that my fault?
:(
Its not like firefox has a block for that type of stuff. I didn't download it, firefox did heh.
Or what happens if you get a popup with pics of underage kids, and your not even looking for porn....
Is that your fault....
*sigh*
These laws are a bit fucked.
Drawings of child porn = real child porn?
So... I can pay rent with my drawn $100 bills now?
~Sylv