Fractal Subject.
17 years ago
Fractals are considered to be generated artwork because the only thing you really need to create them is a program to generate fractals. Moving sliders around to create an affect does not really equate to original works. Another person could take the same program and set things to the same settings and end up with the exact same image.
The site is really for original works, something that cannot be carbon copied and duplicated.
If your friend feels that there is something that sets his works apart, or a reason he feels that factals deserve a place on the site, he can certainly raise the question in a note to an administrator, or in the forums. While we're not out to exclude people from the site, there is a line that we've been trying to keep when it comes to what passes as artwork on the site. The only way for this to change is for there to be a good argument as to how fractals is something beyond simply a generated image from a piece of software.
Damaratus
FA Administrator
Hello, Damaratus. First off, I would like to clear the suspicion of aggressiveness or attitude here. I am in no way attempting to become a troll or anything of that sort.
Fractals, as you have said, are generated artwork. That is true. However, fractals are different than generated artwork. The reason why, is that fractals have an infinite number of possibilities, just like artwork. Tell me this; have you ever seen a fractal the EXACT same as another fractal someone else has made? If you have then it was on purpose, and they had swapped the fractal algorithm.
To create a fractal, you have to do a LOT more than just move a slider or two around. Let me delve into how a fractal is made just a bit. A fractal in it's sense is normally made from two or tmore base points called 'transforms'. A transform is automatically assigned an effect called a 'variation'. Two transform, depending on it's location with the default setting of a 'linear variation', can create many different fractal images in themselves. Granted, with only two transforms and the default variation of linear, I'd limit the amount of possibilities to around 100. However, on these transforms, you can add MANY different effects, changing their strength and power with numbers, (that have an infinite possibility in themselves), to create limitless fractals. With two transforms that have two different variations, with a number between '1 and 10', it is possible to make around 10,000 fractals. (Note that these are simple, extremely crude estimations). This is before adding more transforms or different variations. There are a total of almost 150 different variations for fractals out there on the web. You can add a limitless amount of transforms on an endless grid for location.
In essence, I am saying fractals are ever-changing, and are always different. However, this does not end my part of the argument.
Take Photoshop, for example. There a lot of people that mess around in the filter effects in Photoshop. THAT is simply moving sliders around, and nothing more. However, I have noticed that this is allowed.
Also, I can see where you believe that fractals take no 'originality' part. That's why you probably disapprove of them. However, how many cliche stories or generic artworks have you seen? A lot. Fractals, (and in no offense do I mean to any artists or writers), more often have more originality than most other stuff. Fractal artists, for the most part, do actually TRY to get an effect, and don't simply click one button and slide sliders around and assume that it is a pic. No, most fractal artists strive for a certain image, and make it.
However, for now, that is all. I do not wish to continue for fear of typing too much down and deviating from the point. I hope this is enough to appease you and change you to see our side.
Sincerely,
Raliegh Fhang
The site is really for original works, something that cannot be carbon copied and duplicated.
If your friend feels that there is something that sets his works apart, or a reason he feels that factals deserve a place on the site, he can certainly raise the question in a note to an administrator, or in the forums. While we're not out to exclude people from the site, there is a line that we've been trying to keep when it comes to what passes as artwork on the site. The only way for this to change is for there to be a good argument as to how fractals is something beyond simply a generated image from a piece of software.
Damaratus
FA Administrator
Hello, Damaratus. First off, I would like to clear the suspicion of aggressiveness or attitude here. I am in no way attempting to become a troll or anything of that sort.
Fractals, as you have said, are generated artwork. That is true. However, fractals are different than generated artwork. The reason why, is that fractals have an infinite number of possibilities, just like artwork. Tell me this; have you ever seen a fractal the EXACT same as another fractal someone else has made? If you have then it was on purpose, and they had swapped the fractal algorithm.
To create a fractal, you have to do a LOT more than just move a slider or two around. Let me delve into how a fractal is made just a bit. A fractal in it's sense is normally made from two or tmore base points called 'transforms'. A transform is automatically assigned an effect called a 'variation'. Two transform, depending on it's location with the default setting of a 'linear variation', can create many different fractal images in themselves. Granted, with only two transforms and the default variation of linear, I'd limit the amount of possibilities to around 100. However, on these transforms, you can add MANY different effects, changing their strength and power with numbers, (that have an infinite possibility in themselves), to create limitless fractals. With two transforms that have two different variations, with a number between '1 and 10', it is possible to make around 10,000 fractals. (Note that these are simple, extremely crude estimations). This is before adding more transforms or different variations. There are a total of almost 150 different variations for fractals out there on the web. You can add a limitless amount of transforms on an endless grid for location.
In essence, I am saying fractals are ever-changing, and are always different. However, this does not end my part of the argument.
Take Photoshop, for example. There a lot of people that mess around in the filter effects in Photoshop. THAT is simply moving sliders around, and nothing more. However, I have noticed that this is allowed.
Also, I can see where you believe that fractals take no 'originality' part. That's why you probably disapprove of them. However, how many cliche stories or generic artworks have you seen? A lot. Fractals, (and in no offense do I mean to any artists or writers), more often have more originality than most other stuff. Fractal artists, for the most part, do actually TRY to get an effect, and don't simply click one button and slide sliders around and assume that it is a pic. No, most fractal artists strive for a certain image, and make it.
However, for now, that is all. I do not wish to continue for fear of typing too much down and deviating from the point. I hope this is enough to appease you and change you to see our side.
Sincerely,
Raliegh Fhang
FA+

I'm the photoshop artist you bash. D=
*still for this* x3
But thanks for the support. :3
*applauds*
and he's 100% correct!
ask me, the guy who's posted by FAR the most fractals here!
You can be my evidence. :P
can i be exhibit R?
I'm just waiting for our Damaratus to get back to me on this. I'm sure he has his points, which in all honesty I want to hear. Damaratus is a smart guy, so he doesn't simply say something because that's what he wants. I'm sure he has his reasons. :)
but the point remains
what we do, is NOT as simple as sliding things
it is a VERY complex thing and is never the same two times
They both start with k's. =x
I want my name changed to my fursona, but I'd have to remake for that. Oh well. xD
how about
you give that one guy a fractal
and the program you use
and be like
"k here go"
and if he makes it the exact same
he wins
else
you win
k? x3
Sooo yeah...
haha
maybe i don't understand this. xD
Furrywriter.
Furrywriter.
Furrywriter.
Furrywriter.
Besides, a lot of fractals have a them to them, they have a base in reality and then take a step back from it. I don't know if that was your fractals, but many that I've seen are supposed to resemble in an abstract way, something real. Which, quite literally, is the definition of art.
So, tell the admins to kiss your furry behind :D
But no, I won't tell them that. Most of them are probably taken. :P
No, I am in complete agreement with you. These are works of art. The artist may start with a few generic positions on the graph, but as things start to take shape, so does an image in the artist's mind, and thus an image or design forms. This is no different than a furry artist drawing a furry picture. They start of with a few circles and crosses, and begin to add shape, eventually coming up with a work of art.
As for someone coming up with the exact same thing...I can do that with furry artwork, and I have seen it done by others. Almost anyone can take another piece of artwork done by an artist and copy it, by tracing it with a opaque piece of paper or free hand. Is it original artwork if I trace it or free hand copy it? No, and it's illegal as it is copy writed material. Personally, I think fractal artwork is much more difficult to copy, and as the artists don't post the variables or transformers, it becomes almost impossible to copy.
Just my 2 cents worth. I sure hope the administrators don't take away your rights to post your work. Maybe you could give them a copy of the program and ask them to try and duplicate one of your pieces. I'm willing to bet they will not be able to, especially since I have never seen you post any of your variables for your artwork. Best of luck, and I'm in your corner. *hug*
I appreciate your support. :3
<3
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/554034/
Basically the gist of what I had said involved "generator" programs like Poser and Daz3D. From what I've been told though they're still trying to figure out a proper way to handle that since that's a beast in and of its own right.
I just hope I can get the admins to see our point. I appreciate it. :)
Good luck with your project and job, though! :3
Thank you for your support. :D
Now, I use Paintshop pro, and yes i do use filters. However, I CAN say mine is unique art Because I start off with an Empty page.
Sometimes I'll digitally draw something and then manipulate it to what I hope to see, other times I will go out and photograph things, and then do what I do.
My point is while I do use filters, I use filters like a painter uses a brush. ^^ And part of my pallet and brush is what I use to start it off.
I cannot vouch for how others use their program, I can only explain a small part of what I do. And i can say that what I do is in my opinion, as artistic as fractals, paintings, and whatever else that's out there for mediums. :)
As for programs to makes fractals, I find them to be just as artistic and unique as anything else. It's very difficult to make 2 of the same. And in my opinion, just as much a medium for art as what any other artist does.
It should be allowed. No question about it.
I greatly appreciate your support, Kat. :)
You know, there Are places where you can show off your work that you do, and I'm working on building an art site as well that will feature a lot of abstract and whatever else...there is a damn good chance I'd be featuring artists that do fractals and abstract. Maybe you and those that do art like you should look into those sorts of places?
I know DA is one that accepts such stuff, but they're so damn good I don't want to post there, ya'know?
Besides, I can connect with people on FA. :P
At the same time I just want to issue a warning, please try not to let this argument get out of hand. Just because you disagree doesn't mean you have to be impolite. (This isn't directly addressing you, more like anyone who happens to be involved. I'd hate to hear that one of the admins got insulted or flamed over this, they're not mean people in general.)
* Waits *
"That Eas Easy."
Lol, but no. IT isn't that simple.
And I would never be impolite. I respect the admins greatly, and I would never take things out of hand. Politeness is what I do. :P
It's not easy in any sense to make them, and the most certainly are art. I've gained more inspiration from many of you and Jaden's fractals then I have from alot of the furry art here. They evoke thoughts and feelings in the observer and that is what art is all about!
But thank you, hon. It seems that he seems to think that it takes no effort on our part, which it certainly does. I appreciate your support! <3
Fractal art has far more element variability than the English language, and also has a broader realm of potential developmental variation than a story. A story is a linear sequence of the elements. Fractal art is a two or three dimensional sequence, allowing more degrees of freedom. Moreover, a particular piece of fractal art is a particular unique sequence of millions of pixels (not thousands of characters), each of which can have 36,000,000 values (not just a few dozen as in English).
I'm not belittling writing; I'm a million copy best selling author - but I also understand mathematical complexity and information theory.
I'm not a fractal artist - I just enjoy some of these exceedingly complex and fascinating images.
I would like to point out that fractal art is considered serious art by the dA community, and no one would ever accuse the dA admins and rule-makers of not being picky about art.
I am certain that those FA Admins who are proposing to ban fractal art have never created a single piece of fractal art, just as those FA Admins who wrote FA's irrational photomorph rules never created a single photomorph. They are boldly confident of what they believe to be their knowledge, even though it is often completely incorrect. Those who don't know the limits of their knowledge frequently make poor decisions - and sometimes resent any attempts to provide information to the contrary.
When FA announced the new AUP rules in May 2007, the small FA photomorph community was generally appalled, and petitioned for specific redress of specific poorly thought out rules. We proposed changes to the new AUP that would protect FA from various potential dangers, such as copyright infringement, and made sure that our proposed rule modifications were adequate to prevent FA from becoming a human porn site. All that work - done at Damaratus's invitation - was a total waste of time. If our petition was ever considered, there is no evidence of it, and images that do not violate the current FA rules are still arbitrarily and capriciously removed.
I wish you good luck with your petition, but since the decision-makers know nothing about the matter that they are deciding, I'm far from confident that the outcome will be rational.
I do hope that they will change their thoughts, though. I'm sure that if enough furs kind of band together they might decide that it really is no harm and allow it.
One can only hope, though.