Okay, im gonna close my account next year.
Posted 14 years agoSo you'll have enough time to say goodbye :D
Birthday
Posted 14 years agoYay only 11 days till my birthday:D
Stupid shit
Posted 14 years agoIhave tried to buy Minecraft today but i cant paid with my Dankort/credit card even when it says i can. :( >_<
2 Hours
Posted 14 years agolol i have used 2 hours of my life to watch an old anime and its old and kinda werid :3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qlc70ihusac
Lion king song.
Posted 14 years agohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHfUgAI6OGo
dont ask me why.
dont ask me why.
A really big disappointment
Posted 15 years agoIs it just me or have any of you guys also been disappointed by that you didnt get the thing you wanted most of all?
No Subject
Posted 15 years agoYay new Header and footer for my journals. so what do you think?
Avatars
Posted 15 years agoFrom now on im gonna show my mood through the curent avatar im using.
Brothers.
Posted 15 years ago







No Subject
Posted 15 years agoIt was the sound of the engines, the smell of dust in my nostrils that finaly made me realize. I was in war... The wind to my back, the dirt in my eyes, and my gun in my hands, i rush onwards, towards my ultimate destiny... The distance sound of the gunfire and bombs no longer shock me, i no longer finch and duck, i no longer turn and stare, it all become ambience to my ears. As i hear the passing choppers and rolling tanks, i cant help but think. War is a weird thing. I see the flashes of light form far away. They know we are coming. Pass feelings of dread and fear no longer arise, i o longer sweat and shiver at the thought of them. I feel nothing. But i cant help but think, War is a weird thing... The skies are once again filled. The fylling metal warbirds have begun their fight, the falling sounds of bombs and missiles sing their tuneless song. The final attack has begun... I see my friend next to me... His lifeless body lying in the gutter, home to amercias matyrs. His blood flowing off to join the stream of sewage and fasces below. As i stare at his body i cant help to think, war is a weird thing... The falling wreaks of tanks line the road, fallen titans of the past. Their smoldering ruins now only help to light the darkening sky. i hear my commader shout, he tells us to retreat, but we all know, its to late. i see thedistance star in the sky; it hangs in the air like a second sun. I watch as that star falls, hitting the earth. Like an angel falling from grace. As the blast wave swallows my body and the blinding light consumes me, i cant help but think. War is a weird thing.
The video that made me cry.
Posted 15 years agoNo Subject
Posted 15 years agoINTRODUCTION TO MACROPHILIA
Posted 15 years agoINTRODUCTION TO MACROPHILIA by Samuel Ramses, M.D., Ph.D.
The word macrophile is derived from the Latin roots macro, meaning “large”, and phile, meaning, loosely, “lover”. It was initially coined to refer to a person who experienced a sexual response to situations involving creatures of greatly differing size. In such a situation, one of the creatures must of necessity be a “giant” in relation to the other, and thus macrophile was considered to be a suitably comprehensive term. In recent years, however, the term has come to refer to a person who specifically enjoys the appearance of giant creatures, whereas microphile has been applied to those who prefer creatures who are tiny. For clarity, the term macrophile will be used here in its original, all-inclusive definition.
Macrophilia is a fairly widespread trait, and is found in individuals of many different ethnic and social backgrounds. No common element has yet been found that can point to an environmental cause, although three characteristics are repeatedly seen:
Macrophilia manifests itself in very early childhood. Children with macrophilic tendencies commonly exhibit a sexual or pseudo-sexual response to giants long before physical puberty.
Macrophilia is almost always a guilty pleasure. This is perhaps related to the previous observation, as sexuality in very young children is looked down upon, and the associated repression and guilt carry over into adulthood. Macrophiles are extremely shy about their tendencies, even among sympathetic peers, and to a greater degree than other fetishists. It is felt that this is the singular reason that macrophilia has not been more thoroughly reported in the literature of various cultures.
Macrophiles usually feel isolated, and believe that few if any others share their desires.
The specific stimuli which elicit a sexual response in a macrophile, while varied, tend to fall into two broad categories, which are not mutually exclusive. They are summarized here as directly sexual situations and indirectly sexual or fixational situations.
Directly sexual stimuli are the more easily understood. These involve situations in which sexual contact occurs between creatures (human or otherwise) whose physical size differs by greater than (as an arbitrary delimiter) a factor of two, and often much more. Such situations commonly involve the following:
Full-body contact with the genitalia of a male giant, or full-body insertion into the vagina of a female
Oral contact, in which the smaller party is licked or taken entirely into the mouth of the giant (see vorarephilia, below)
Bathing in or inundation by the sexual fluids of a giant
Frotteurism, or masturbation by rubbing of the body against other portions of the giant’s person
Indirectly sexual or fixational situations involve other fetishes that often go hand-in-hand with macrophilia. Interestingly, these "other" preoccupations do not always manifest themselves in non-macrophilic situations, but rather will only be observed when a giant and/or a tiny person are involved. They include:
Sadism/masochism: pleasure is achieved by being physically harmed or even killed by a giant
Dominance/submission: pleasure is derived from being at the mercy of a giant, or from being in control of a tiny person
Vorarephilia: a fixation with eating or swallowing
Crush fixations: a sexual thrill is gained by the act of crushing or of seeing a small creature crushed; a more specific subset is macrophilic podophilia (foot fetishism), in which pleasure is obtained from small creatures being stepped on
Destruction: pleasure is obtained from the act of demolishing buildings and/or massive loss of life (often associated with displaced aggression)
Bestial fixations: the subject of desire is a giant animal, often anthropomorphized (given human characteristics)
Excretory fixations
Other fixations
As previously stated, the macrophile will often find one or more of these practices unappealing or even repugnant in “normal” situations; yet, when they are being perpetrated by or upon a giant, they suddenly become attractive. Similarly, the distinction between heterosexuality and homosexuality is sometimes blurred or reduced to zero, as staunchly heterosexual macrophiles will often find themselves attracted to the images of giants or tiny persons of the same sex, and vice-versa.
CASE HISTORY The subject is a male Caucasian, age 30, from an upper-middle class suburban background, and reportedly from a well-adjusted family. He is highly educated and has no criminal record. His sense of morals and of civic duty are highly-developed, to the extent that he volunteers frequently for local charitable and relief organizations. The subject reports that since very early childhood he experienced a sexual response in the form of genital erection to films in which giant monsters would destroy cities. He further reports that the strongest response was elicited by the explicit depiction of death by trampling. As an adult, his fantasies continued in the destruction/sadism/crush-fixation fields, and also included vorarephilia as well as directly sexual situations. Despite what might be considered alarmingly antisocial macrophilic fixations, the subject has experienced normal sexual relations in the past and has shown no signs of violent or unusually destructive behavior.
A simplistic view of macrophilia holds that persons who are of a submissive sexual nature often prefer to view themselves in the role of the tiny person interacting with a giant creature, whereas those of a dominant sexual nature view themselves as a giant. Whereas this may indeed be true in a certain number of cases, it is far from a complete picture. A significant number of macrophiles exhibit the opposite behavior, while others are content with either role, regardless of their own sexual leanings. This group seems to enjoy the situation itself, rather than the specific role being played, and are thus equally excited by the view from the top, from the bottom, or from that of the omniscient observer.
Any study of psychosexual phenomena should include mention of the question of latency. There are subjects who claim to have developed macrophilic tendencies after postpubescent exposure to it. It is a matter of debate whether these individuals are “true” macrophiles who simply did not recognize or were unwilling to acknowledge earlier tendencies, or are simply expanding upon existing tendencies which become much more pronounced when the sexual partner is gigantic. A hypothesis has been put forth that the question can by answered for purely fixational macrophiles by examining whether a fetish existed before macrophilia was discovered and whether it persists in the absence of a giant; while intuitive, this hypothesis has yet to undergo any rigorous testing. Thus, at this time, the question of latent macrophilia remains the subject of debate.
In conclusion, it should be noted once more that macrophilia is far from rare, as evidenced by the growing number of admitted macrophiles that have come forth in recent years. A suggestion that it is actually quite common can be found in the popularity of cinematic films featuring giant monsters, which draw in enormous crowds and cult followings in spite of sometimes questionable quality. Perhaps, deep in the psyche of many of the thousands of moviegoers, sits the child who wrestled with unfamiliar and frightening sensations at the tale of Jack and the Beanstalk, and who now laughs raucously – yet nervously – at the object of desire who rages across the screen, leaving the viewer feeling aroused, nervous, and deeply, utterly alone.
The word macrophile is derived from the Latin roots macro, meaning “large”, and phile, meaning, loosely, “lover”. It was initially coined to refer to a person who experienced a sexual response to situations involving creatures of greatly differing size. In such a situation, one of the creatures must of necessity be a “giant” in relation to the other, and thus macrophile was considered to be a suitably comprehensive term. In recent years, however, the term has come to refer to a person who specifically enjoys the appearance of giant creatures, whereas microphile has been applied to those who prefer creatures who are tiny. For clarity, the term macrophile will be used here in its original, all-inclusive definition.
Macrophilia is a fairly widespread trait, and is found in individuals of many different ethnic and social backgrounds. No common element has yet been found that can point to an environmental cause, although three characteristics are repeatedly seen:
Macrophilia manifests itself in very early childhood. Children with macrophilic tendencies commonly exhibit a sexual or pseudo-sexual response to giants long before physical puberty.
Macrophilia is almost always a guilty pleasure. This is perhaps related to the previous observation, as sexuality in very young children is looked down upon, and the associated repression and guilt carry over into adulthood. Macrophiles are extremely shy about their tendencies, even among sympathetic peers, and to a greater degree than other fetishists. It is felt that this is the singular reason that macrophilia has not been more thoroughly reported in the literature of various cultures.
Macrophiles usually feel isolated, and believe that few if any others share their desires.
The specific stimuli which elicit a sexual response in a macrophile, while varied, tend to fall into two broad categories, which are not mutually exclusive. They are summarized here as directly sexual situations and indirectly sexual or fixational situations.
Directly sexual stimuli are the more easily understood. These involve situations in which sexual contact occurs between creatures (human or otherwise) whose physical size differs by greater than (as an arbitrary delimiter) a factor of two, and often much more. Such situations commonly involve the following:
Full-body contact with the genitalia of a male giant, or full-body insertion into the vagina of a female
Oral contact, in which the smaller party is licked or taken entirely into the mouth of the giant (see vorarephilia, below)
Bathing in or inundation by the sexual fluids of a giant
Frotteurism, or masturbation by rubbing of the body against other portions of the giant’s person
Indirectly sexual or fixational situations involve other fetishes that often go hand-in-hand with macrophilia. Interestingly, these "other" preoccupations do not always manifest themselves in non-macrophilic situations, but rather will only be observed when a giant and/or a tiny person are involved. They include:
Sadism/masochism: pleasure is achieved by being physically harmed or even killed by a giant
Dominance/submission: pleasure is derived from being at the mercy of a giant, or from being in control of a tiny person
Vorarephilia: a fixation with eating or swallowing
Crush fixations: a sexual thrill is gained by the act of crushing or of seeing a small creature crushed; a more specific subset is macrophilic podophilia (foot fetishism), in which pleasure is obtained from small creatures being stepped on
Destruction: pleasure is obtained from the act of demolishing buildings and/or massive loss of life (often associated with displaced aggression)
Bestial fixations: the subject of desire is a giant animal, often anthropomorphized (given human characteristics)
Excretory fixations
Other fixations
As previously stated, the macrophile will often find one or more of these practices unappealing or even repugnant in “normal” situations; yet, when they are being perpetrated by or upon a giant, they suddenly become attractive. Similarly, the distinction between heterosexuality and homosexuality is sometimes blurred or reduced to zero, as staunchly heterosexual macrophiles will often find themselves attracted to the images of giants or tiny persons of the same sex, and vice-versa.
CASE HISTORY The subject is a male Caucasian, age 30, from an upper-middle class suburban background, and reportedly from a well-adjusted family. He is highly educated and has no criminal record. His sense of morals and of civic duty are highly-developed, to the extent that he volunteers frequently for local charitable and relief organizations. The subject reports that since very early childhood he experienced a sexual response in the form of genital erection to films in which giant monsters would destroy cities. He further reports that the strongest response was elicited by the explicit depiction of death by trampling. As an adult, his fantasies continued in the destruction/sadism/crush-fixation fields, and also included vorarephilia as well as directly sexual situations. Despite what might be considered alarmingly antisocial macrophilic fixations, the subject has experienced normal sexual relations in the past and has shown no signs of violent or unusually destructive behavior.
A simplistic view of macrophilia holds that persons who are of a submissive sexual nature often prefer to view themselves in the role of the tiny person interacting with a giant creature, whereas those of a dominant sexual nature view themselves as a giant. Whereas this may indeed be true in a certain number of cases, it is far from a complete picture. A significant number of macrophiles exhibit the opposite behavior, while others are content with either role, regardless of their own sexual leanings. This group seems to enjoy the situation itself, rather than the specific role being played, and are thus equally excited by the view from the top, from the bottom, or from that of the omniscient observer.
Any study of psychosexual phenomena should include mention of the question of latency. There are subjects who claim to have developed macrophilic tendencies after postpubescent exposure to it. It is a matter of debate whether these individuals are “true” macrophiles who simply did not recognize or were unwilling to acknowledge earlier tendencies, or are simply expanding upon existing tendencies which become much more pronounced when the sexual partner is gigantic. A hypothesis has been put forth that the question can by answered for purely fixational macrophiles by examining whether a fetish existed before macrophilia was discovered and whether it persists in the absence of a giant; while intuitive, this hypothesis has yet to undergo any rigorous testing. Thus, at this time, the question of latent macrophilia remains the subject of debate.
In conclusion, it should be noted once more that macrophilia is far from rare, as evidenced by the growing number of admitted macrophiles that have come forth in recent years. A suggestion that it is actually quite common can be found in the popularity of cinematic films featuring giant monsters, which draw in enormous crowds and cult followings in spite of sometimes questionable quality. Perhaps, deep in the psyche of many of the thousands of moviegoers, sits the child who wrestled with unfamiliar and frightening sensations at the tale of Jack and the Beanstalk, and who now laughs raucously – yet nervously – at the object of desire who rages across the screen, leaving the viewer feeling aroused, nervous, and deeply, utterly alone.
CoD MW2 joke
Posted 15 years agolol a joke i got from a friend yesterday:
So what, it took your bullet 1 extra second to hit the wall. That's not lag. It took Jesus 3 days to respawn. Now THAT, is lag
So what, it took your bullet 1 extra second to hit the wall. That's not lag. It took Jesus 3 days to respawn. Now THAT, is lag
Charlie the Unicorn 1 2 and 3.
Posted 15 years agoCharlie the Unicorn:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsGY.....eature=channel
Charlie the Unicorn 2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFCS.....eature=channel
Charlie the Unicorn 3:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaCC.....eature=channel
Charlie the Unicorn 2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFCS.....eature=channel
Charlie the Unicorn 3:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaCC.....eature=channel
No Subject
Posted 15 years agoomg there is just coming some awesome games this year. take a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww10cZWqlWM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ3L.....eature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh61.....eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ3L.....eature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh61.....eature=related
tagging
Posted 15 years ago1) Post these rules
2) Post 8 true things about yourself
3) At the end you must tag 8 people and post their icons
4) Go to their page and send them a message saying you tagged them
5) NO TAG-BACKS
1) i love call of duty and need for speed
2) i love cats
3) i hate Daniel
4) i hate and love war( dont ask me why)
5) Svensk pølseret is my favorite food
6) i hate to be in another contry
7) i like to go too legoland
8) i think this was a funny idea xD
tagged








Source > http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1517255/
2) Post 8 true things about yourself
3) At the end you must tag 8 people and post their icons
4) Go to their page and send them a message saying you tagged them
5) NO TAG-BACKS
1) i love call of duty and need for speed
2) i love cats
3) i hate Daniel
4) i hate and love war( dont ask me why)
5) Svensk pølseret is my favorite food
6) i hate to be in another contry
7) i like to go too legoland
8) i think this was a funny idea xD
tagged








Source > http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1517255/
No Subject
Posted 15 years agohave you ever just want to stomp some humans? (WTF)
http://www.y8.com/games/I_am_Godzilla
http://www.y8.com/games/I_am_Godzilla
No Subject
Posted 15 years agoomg you have to try this awesome game
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-EcxzbbY1U
http://www.dragonsvsrobots.com/main/home
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-EcxzbbY1U
http://www.dragonsvsrobots.com/main/home
No Subject
Posted 15 years agoModern Warfare 2
Posted 15 years agoOmg this Journal dont make any sense but whatever. Im really starting to wish tHat MW2 had the R700 Sniper Riffle=`(
Danish soldiers in Helmand.
Posted 15 years agoSome pices of the brave danish soldiers in Helmand. my uncle is the number ten guy in the pices of the dead soldiers. May they rest in peace :( :( :( :( :( :( :( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xDe.....eature=related
No Subject
Posted 15 years agoNo Subject
Posted 15 years ago....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
US soldier saved by...glass?
Posted 15 years agothis is a pretty amazing video from the luckly still living soldier. injoy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN_mA9gL09M