
Chrome Series:
<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>
huskywolf suggested that I might try converting my Chrome I photo to black and white. After playing around with it a while, here is the result.
I prefer the original, but maybe that's just because I've seen it only in color since I took the photo in 2003. Feel free to compare and comment. Here is a link to the color version:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/15317759/
I've made a hobby of photographing cars close up. I love the distorted reflections in the chrome of great old cars. At car shows, I'm the guy sitting on the ground with my camera, getting the right angle on a bumper, grille, or hub cap.
<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>

I prefer the original, but maybe that's just because I've seen it only in color since I took the photo in 2003. Feel free to compare and comment. Here is a link to the color version:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/15317759/
I've made a hobby of photographing cars close up. I love the distorted reflections in the chrome of great old cars. At car shows, I'm the guy sitting on the ground with my camera, getting the right angle on a bumper, grille, or hub cap.
Category Photography / Miscellaneous
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 853px
File Size 293.6 kB
Listed in Folders
Hey thanks for taking my suggestion on reducing it to a B/W version, great to see it in B/W and i think it makes it a little punchier somehow .. I can't really explain why i like B/W photography more, I think for landscapes if the lighting is right it makes the scene a little moodier .. but in this case it just looks good :)
Thanks again, great to see the revised image *wags*
Thanks again, great to see the revised image *wags*
Don't get me wrong. I like B&W photography too. Ansel Adams is one of my favorites. It amazes me how he could capture the beauty of a landscape without color.
I think the B&W makes this photo more mysterious. It's not as apparent (at least not as quickly) as to what you're really looking at.
I think the B&W makes this photo more mysterious. It's not as apparent (at least not as quickly) as to what you're really looking at.
Comments