
This is an attempt at visualizing a 50's-era Striker design with radical differences to today's designs. The Banshee may look weird compared to more conventional airframes, but there is method in my madness --- all of it's features have been successfully implemented into real aircraft. The "side-by-side" 2-seat configuration has been used in many production designs (A-6 Intruder, Buccaneer, F-111 Raven, Su-24 Fencer, Su-32/34 Fullback, etc.). The crescent wings are also a proven concept (Buccaneer, Valiant, Jaguar, etc.). The engine pod, carried above the fuselage has been used in many commercial designs (Learjet, Gulfstream, DC-10, Tu-134, etc.), and military designs as well (YF-107 Ultrasabre, Tu-22 Blinder, etc.). Many airframes use the all-flying tail ("T"-tail) concept (F-101 Voodoo, F-104 Starfighter, Javelin, DC-10, C-5 Galaxy, etc.), and the "split-open" airbrake is used on the Yak-28G Brewer, A-6 Intruder, and Buccaneer.
It's the bending all of these features into one airframe that make the Banshee unique.
Not that it's a very SAFE design, though, because;
1- The wing-mounted guns would have terrible accuracy and convergence.
2- The all-flying tail make certain spins unrecoverable --- if you enter one, you crash. Period.
3- The engines-above configuration means that ejecting while the turbines are above certain RPMs means going head-first into a supersonic blender.
4- the long aft fuselage extension makes landings VERY dangerous if you over-rotate.
One would have to be either very brave or very insane to fly an aircraft like this!
It's the bending all of these features into one airframe that make the Banshee unique.
Not that it's a very SAFE design, though, because;
1- The wing-mounted guns would have terrible accuracy and convergence.
2- The all-flying tail make certain spins unrecoverable --- if you enter one, you crash. Period.
3- The engines-above configuration means that ejecting while the turbines are above certain RPMs means going head-first into a supersonic blender.
4- the long aft fuselage extension makes landings VERY dangerous if you over-rotate.
One would have to be either very brave or very insane to fly an aircraft like this!
Category Designs / Miscellaneous
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 768 x 960px
File Size 132.9 kB
Personally I like cannards for aircraft. Looking at the image, the main gear might be a bit to far forward unless ther eis sufficient weight in the nose to bring the center of gravity forward.
Personally I would drop the engines to just above the wings and next to the fusalage. If i had more time I could try the design in X-plane and see how she might fly... I have posted some of my planes on my DA account.
Personally I would drop the engines to just above the wings and next to the fusalage. If i had more time I could try the design in X-plane and see how she might fly... I have posted some of my planes on my DA account.
Ahh, the F7U Cutlass...
Now THAT was a lemon. Over 25% were lost in accidents in thier 5 years of service (they were hurried into retirement). F7U's never saw combat, nor were stationed anywhere that air combat was likely, and no foreign armed forces seriously considered ever importing them.
Hell, just getting into and out of one was a real pain in the ass --- the sills of the cockpit were higher off the flight deck than the tops of the vertical stabilizers!
Now THAT was a lemon. Over 25% were lost in accidents in thier 5 years of service (they were hurried into retirement). F7U's never saw combat, nor were stationed anywhere that air combat was likely, and no foreign armed forces seriously considered ever importing them.
Hell, just getting into and out of one was a real pain in the ass --- the sills of the cockpit were higher off the flight deck than the tops of the vertical stabilizers!
hmm, with only a couple minor alterations, this could pass for a private jet... very usefull for first strike initiatives, 'cause you could simply "charter" it to fly over your target, and bombs away XD though that would most likely cause death to the pilot & co-pilot VERY quickly...
loving 'em man!
loving 'em man!
Comments