FA+
Shop
5586
Views
Views
586
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / Miscellaneous
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 2560 x 1440
File Size 3.81 MB
Report this content
★
More from Feretta
Listed in Folders
![[Comm] PSHYEUWW!](http://d.furaffinity.net/art/feretta/1677021630/1677021630.feretta_230216_pathstrider_sd.png "Click to change the View")
[Comm] PSHYEUWW!
Sharp railgun noises.
If you like what I do, consider supporting me on my Patreon!
I post high res versions of almost everything I put out, comics, commissions and personal stuff.
If you like what I do, consider supporting me on my Patreon!
I post high res versions of almost everything I put out, comics, commissions and personal stuff.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Miscellaneous
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 2560 x 1440px
File Size 3.81 MB
Listed in Folders
My universty age me would have loved to calculate the speed of that bullet.
Now I can only say. That's way to loud for not protected hearing/glass.
¿Maeby mach 10? Those rings are hard to get in such size [Proportional to the proyectile volume.]
In any case, watever it hits, has a hole. And the thing after. And the thing after.
Now I can only say. That's way to loud for not protected hearing/glass.
¿Maeby mach 10? Those rings are hard to get in such size [Proportional to the proyectile volume.]
In any case, watever it hits, has a hole. And the thing after. And the thing after.
It depends on the tech. But, in base phisics, yeah.
If it is, in fact, a "simple" railgun. Well, the max speed is not to high. Managable with a body of that size.
[Railgun "only" have a magnetic suspended rail and a magnetic launcher at the back, giving a top speed. Higher than gunpowder by a lot. But still]
A coilgun, or gauss cannon, is more probable. And the recoil is, endeed, punchy as hell.
[Coilgun have the rail with imposed magnetic propulsion. Giving a higher top speed, depending on the length of the rail]
What I think would be nicer, and WAY more expensive, is actually a minirocket railgun launcher.
A "simple" railgun that gives a initial propulsion and direction that trigers a self propeling proyectile.
That would not have a lot of recoil. But each bullet would be a smal fortune for today's standars.
[Minirocket bullets have being desinged in modern warfare. But the scaling cost of ammo imposed a heavy drawback for minimal improvements]
If it is, in fact, a "simple" railgun. Well, the max speed is not to high. Managable with a body of that size.
[Railgun "only" have a magnetic suspended rail and a magnetic launcher at the back, giving a top speed. Higher than gunpowder by a lot. But still]
A coilgun, or gauss cannon, is more probable. And the recoil is, endeed, punchy as hell.
[Coilgun have the rail with imposed magnetic propulsion. Giving a higher top speed, depending on the length of the rail]
What I think would be nicer, and WAY more expensive, is actually a minirocket railgun launcher.
A "simple" railgun that gives a initial propulsion and direction that trigers a self propeling proyectile.
That would not have a lot of recoil. But each bullet would be a smal fortune for today's standars.
[Minirocket bullets have being desinged in modern warfare. But the scaling cost of ammo imposed a heavy drawback for minimal improvements]
Comments