A note on content rating
3 years ago
Some of you may be wondering why I mark a number of submissions as mature or adult when there aren't even any dicks showing. Simply put, when choosing content rating I make my assessment based on what the intent of the piece is - if it's a showcase of kinks with the sole aim of arousal, I'm probably going to mark it as Mature at the very least, regardless of what body parts happen to be on display.
It is also a decision I tend make for sequences as a whole: if latter parts are sufficiently spicy, I'm likely to flag the whole thing as Adult, even if the early stages are relatively tame.
So I'm setting ratings more based on the spirit of the rules rather than they're specifically worded. As such, the content ratings I assign here will sometimes be more toward the adult end of things than if I went by the wording of the rules exactly (but importantly, not the other way round).
All of this is largely immaterial given that I expect my gallery here to overwhelmingly attract the attention of those who are old enough to choose what they look at - and furthermore, who are here to indulge in their kinks.
It is also a decision I tend make for sequences as a whole: if latter parts are sufficiently spicy, I'm likely to flag the whole thing as Adult, even if the early stages are relatively tame.
So I'm setting ratings more based on the spirit of the rules rather than they're specifically worded. As such, the content ratings I assign here will sometimes be more toward the adult end of things than if I went by the wording of the rules exactly (but importantly, not the other way round).
All of this is largely immaterial given that I expect my gallery here to overwhelmingly attract the attention of those who are old enough to choose what they look at - and furthermore, who are here to indulge in their kinks.