Well, you know, silence is golden.

The problem with a lot of porn dialogue is that, and let's be honest here, lots of people who write it haven't had sex before and thus not only don't know how people talk during sex but also don't know what even dirty talkers often have limits for.

Hardest things to write properly:

1. Porn dialogue
2. Comedy
3.
4.
...
...
44.
45. Children's books
46.
47. Mathematical handbooks.
48. User manuals.
49. Furry fiction
50. In a foreign language.
51. Drama.
52. Tragedy.
53. Misery porn.
...
197. Personal diary.
198. Reddit ramblings.
199. Shitposting.

No. I've done it before and generally I refuse to do it again. It's not a skill anyone has mastered anywhere.

There's a reason it's a cliche, and that "bad for porn dialogue" is a standard insult for bad scriptwriting. Talking during sex is pretty unrealistic, you're otherwise using a lot of air and focus. At best, you hammer certain points to move the needle on particular fetish focus like having a written character mention a kinky backstory or element like dominance direction, or some fetish classification, or something the target audience likes such as an ethnic identity, or social stratum, or specific species interaction. Porn dialogue is at best a tool, but a tool that mostly smashes fingers.

CHIRON: Thou has undone our mother.

AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.

Good enough for Shakespeare, good enough for me. Maybe the issue is you're going to porn and expecting literature instead of, y'know....porn. Porn is silly. It's goofy. It's a celebration of the cliche. It's a protest against conformity and something that is meant to help us revel in sensual absurdity. Yeah, sometimes it ends up being profound...but most of the time it's about people (or animal people...or people with animals...you get the picture) fucking. Since most people don't talk during sex and sex scenarios without talking are boring to look at the fact is most porn scenes are going to be kind of silly if not downright ridiculous.

In other words, maybe lighten up a bit. This is Furaffinity, not the Louvre. That, and remember that there's a reason they called old Willie the bawdy bard.

I go into porn expecting absolutely nothing, that's why I draw my own, because I almost never see anything else I enjoy. Nothing here is implying that I expect high art in porn dialogue, I just think that there are few things less sexy to me than 12-year-olds so I don't know why all the same shit 12-year-olds say on the playground is the same terminology and phrasing we insist on using in adult work. I write stories with ridiculous scenarios and behaviors all the time but I figure, if the situation itself is sexy then I don't need to beat the reader over the head with it by stacking naughty words on top of each other like Jenga, to similar results.

And even that wouldn't be so bad except it all sounds exactly the same each and every time and perhaps that's the part which gets me the most, not only is it decidedly unsexy but when people try and argue that by saying "everyone has different tastes" that's not even applicable here because everyone writes the exact same shit. Porn dialogue is the most predictable thing in the world. And I've gotten quite a bit of praise over the years for how I write my own dirty stories so I arrogantly look to those people who gave me those kind words and say "Thank you. Did you know you can put good dialogue in your own stories as well? Or even just not terrible dialogue?"

As I've been saying more often about a lot of things: regardless of taste, there's a difference between good and bad. Those words have to mean something.

When it comes to art there is no good and bad. It's fine not like shit but that doesn't mean you get to lump all of us creative types into one shit basket. It just comes off sounding like you're just looking for reasons to complain. What useful purpose does your rant serve?

Hard disagree on that first point. There is quality art and there is low quality art. A master artist who honed their craft for years is not on the same playing field as somebody who started yesterday. Like I said, good and bad mean things. It's separate from taste. One can simply admit they enjoy bad things, much like how I thoroughly enjoy the Friday the 13 movies. They're crap. I know that. Doesn't stop me from loving them, nor does it prevent me from recognizing that they're objectively bad when compared against a high quality film.

Taste is subjective. Quality is objective.

Skill =/= quality. Someone can have all the skill in the world and make a really amazing piece of art but if it's an art of two Nazis saluting one another it's kind of shit. Besides-we're not talking quality here. Much like with the two Nazi art if you've got a well-written book that espouses eugenics or a well-made film that promotes racist ideology they're kind of shit, too.

In regards to porn, what matters isn't the quality of writing or art or acting it's how it affects the reader and/or viewer. Subjective taste matters most of all. Sure-90% of everything may be shit but what is shit to you may not be shit to someone else.

The world isn't going to suddenly start trying to make its creative efforts suit your ideals and that's a good thing. It shouldn't. The fact that so much of it doesn't means that people who aren't into whatever it is you're into get to enjoy things, too. Otherwise you'd be happy but a lot of people wouldn't be.

I just think it's kind of selfish to expect everyone to cater to your tastes.

I'm complaining about things, in my own personal journal, that I think are stupid, as humans have done since the beginning of language. I am not running a political campaign which exploits the grievances of the majority demographic in order to attain authoritarian power and take away everyone's bad porn dialogue.

Mellow out, dude. If you want to read 'fuck me, daddy' stories then go read them. They don't need you to defend them. They're winning.

Gonna disagree with sex scenarios without talking being boring to look at.

I guess the hardest part is to make it look natural.

I have read many comics and art, I just feel the talks and reactions just don't feel natural.

but at the end of the day, most people just read the comics to jerk off, watching something dumb or unnatural turns me off while reading Porn comics.

This is why when I write porn they just don't talk.

Writing good dialog isn't that difficult nor is there anything wrong with being a little cliche now and then.

If writing good dialogue wasn't that difficult there would be significantly fewer examples of bad dialogue. Given your points of view you showed up higher in the thread I don't really put much stock in your opinion about the 'okayness' of bog-standard porn dialogue, nor do I agree with anything you said.

I used to be a writer, albeit an admittedly subpar one. I can gladly say I've never used any of those words however.

My main gripe is giving loving and sensitive personalities to villainous characters who otherwise wouldn't have those characteristics to begin with. "My love" "my darling" "babe", a clad anti-hero in nothing but rainbow jocks walking hand in hand with a twink down a pride parade. Like, no. You suck at realism and can't see a personality past your own. Give realistic dialogue that fits the character.

What does this even mean? How is that in any way an example of a villainous character?

Assuming I'm interpreting this correctly I have to disagree, at least in a general sense. While it's possible that a villainous character could be written inconsistently depending on their particular 'brand' of villainy, it's not uncommon to write a villain who truly doesn't believe they're the villain and who is capable of expressing feelings of love or affection to those they feel are deserving of it. It could also be a sign of manipulation rather than true affection. So, it depends on the villain in question, is what I'm saying.