The irony in this is priceless

Especially that part heavily inspired by George Orwell's 1984 which basically sums up the result in one phrase.
"FAILURE IS SUCCESS"

I agreev

So perfect.

Notice that these commie types have a privileged background 99% of the time,
have nearly ZERO experience working a paid job and make their living juicing of the purse from somebody else.
Just like their prophet Karl Marx.

Yep.

So appropriate~ Now if only the artists that use capitalism to make their living only to bash it endlessly would off themselves so sportingly for the rest of the world.

That requires self awareness, intelligence and courage. They lack all three.

Amen to that.

Saying "Fuck Capitalism" whilst practicing literal capitalism is peak irony. I don't blame toxic work cultures on capitalism, just the self-indulgent entitled Karens who manipulated the market to their advantage to benefit them and ONLY them (in the fewest and KINDEST of words >.>). I remember there was this documentary my parents watched where it's all about people who fled to...gosh, I can't remember where, tbh, but anyway, they were basically going all in about the "Wonders of Anarchy" and how "Government ruins everything" and they wanted to run things with a decentralized currency and I'm like "So you want to flee from government, to create your own government...? Okay...?" Like, it never ceases to amaze me how people will say "I dislike this system" and when asked how to improve it, they explain what they'd do and just circle back around to basically explaining how the system they dislike works; it's like...yeah...people can be kinda dumb like that, but hey...sometimes you just gotta let 'em figure out how to swim or let 'em sink, 'cause if they're so averse to having things explained to 'em, then no amount of convincing is gonna convince 'em, ya know? Tl;dr: some people learn best through the School of Hard Knocks...and some people flunk out.

The irony of this is absolutely perfect! And the best part it proved their ideas did not work! But the sad fact is they are not likely to figure that out.

It just dawned on me... this is fantastic of what happens when you run our of other people's money to spend with socialism and or communism.

Communism needs Capitalism to exist. Capitalism doesn't need Communism to exist.
Once Capitalism money runs out it's game over.
We see this happen over and over again.

Yes we have to the detriment of the people saddled with Communism.

I remember my 1st meeting in the university at the beginning of the 1st academic year. The speaker was the chief of Center of Automation of our local petrochemical complex (the university was it's main source of cadres). He was about 1940 year born and he told us the story from his childhood back in post WWII time. He was in elimentary school and the teacher told them about communism. Somebody in the class asked when it will come. The teacher answered:
"When everything will be automatic. See you sit without boots. But you'll have only press the button and you'll have the boots".

She was smart woman. Technically communism doesn't need anything except unlimited production capabilities. With that nobody wouldn't need money at all. And in Soviet fantstic literature of this time it's common idea. And I suppose back in 1950s there idea seemed as realistic as interstellar travel after Gagarin's flight.

No state ever reached that for now but it's partially possible f. e. it's possible to produce enough food for everybody since 1950-1960 years and modern IT technologies allows absolute control over the distribution making it's very hard or even impossible to fuck the system and get more than you really need.

Running private business and denying capitalism looks like bees hating honey. But USSR had different froms of individual or collective buisness till 1960. If you and your friend decide to build roadside cafe and you work in it not just take a rent while hired people work it doesn't contradict with communist ideas because you work for your own. And since Khrushev banned it USSR should be treated as state capitalism country because the state not workers became the only owner of means of production.