it's not the height, i think there trying to get rid of baby stuff now from what i see in people's journal's.

It's height. They trying to ban anyone who has characters who have shortened height and childlike features. IE: the 1000 year old loli argument. Which wouldn't be too bad if this policy wasn't at the discretion of the mod staff. So if they think your character portrays loli or shota in any form or fashion, including height despite having clear adult features, then you're gone. :T

So basically, no more short, midget, or dwarf characters or species in adult or light fetish artwork.
So, Warwick Davis' hypothetical chinchilla fursona has to be strictly safe for work, even if the character is in their mid-30's.

Essentially, since the policy is at the discretion of the mods, if they deem it ban worthy, then it's ban worthy. :T

Gotcha. Well, time for people to comb through their galleries and play another year of "Whose Violation is it Anyway"
Honestly it wouldn't be as bad if not combined with the Non-expiring three-strike system and the poor admin communication