FA+
Shop
Hey look, this nobody has an opinion FA
2 years ago
Yeah I'm going to join the chorus, whatever bloody numpty up in FA HQ made the decision that even creatures like POKEMON who have a LEVEL based evolution system and not an AGE based evolution system (hello everstone) is under the concern of being 'child porn' is a damn idiot!
I get that cracking down on child porn as hard as possible is a good thing but broadening the range so far that you attack things such as pokemon and digimon all because someone somewhere MIGHT think they look child like is a fine way to finally slaughter this website that's been limping along for years due to it simply being THE place.
This policy needs to be reconsidered immediately and returned to a case by case basis rather than "if it possibly looks like a child, it violates CP policies".
I know i have no weight, and all I'm doing is screaming into the wind but this really needs to be reconsidered else it's a direct attack on one of the core groups of the website.
Edit: FA has clarified the policy to try to indicate that pokemon GENERALLY won't get the treatment except when clearly meant to be a child but even that is borderline vague as it is. Who decides if a charmander is meant to be a child or merely a member of the evolution line who just doesn't want to evolve for many reasons?
I get that cracking down on child porn as hard as possible is a good thing but broadening the range so far that you attack things such as pokemon and digimon all because someone somewhere MIGHT think they look child like is a fine way to finally slaughter this website that's been limping along for years due to it simply being THE place.
This policy needs to be reconsidered immediately and returned to a case by case basis rather than "if it possibly looks like a child, it violates CP policies".
I know i have no weight, and all I'm doing is screaming into the wind but this really needs to be reconsidered else it's a direct attack on one of the core groups of the website.
Edit: FA has clarified the policy to try to indicate that pokemon GENERALLY won't get the treatment except when clearly meant to be a child but even that is borderline vague as it is. Who decides if a charmander is meant to be a child or merely a member of the evolution line who just doesn't want to evolve for many reasons?
