please post your gallery on site(s) like E-hentai

https://cohost.org/

here

... But you don't have child characters.


I'm sorry but writting down is my emotions

The new rules will generally work on July 24, and logically from this date it will be impossible to publish art with characters in the form of children and lolos who are 2000 years old in words.

In general, there are no standards that would say that your characters fall under this rule.

What in general prompted them to such a stupid rule?

It would be better if they fixed the categories for choosing the character's race.


Now I even wanted to save all your expenses, even those that I don't like because you invested your time in them.

And you can also ask the site owners themselves what you have in the gallery falls under the new rules and may not fall at all.


Oh, goodbye cartoon cute style, because now it's children's and all the characters in it are children's, even if the character just didn't grow out..... I completely forgot now that the characters below 100 cm are children... that's how they insulted dwarf people.

Yeah I dont have child characters, but the widespread blanket is way too broad and indiscriminate and it sounds like it's just "if they are short and have soft features it's a child and you will be banned"

Now we need to rely on this classification, which will only add more misunderstanding like this:

- NO, there is no blanket ban across species.
- NO, there is no list of species that we will always take action on.
- YES, characters in your NSFW art must be aged up.
- NO, simply making something bigger or smaller does not indicate age.
- We look at anatomy proportionally alongside other context in submissions.


And of course

"If you have questions as to whether this may apply to your content, please feel free to open a ticket under “NSFW Underage Content” with links to the content in question, and we can verify if the content is in violation or not."


I think that you should require them to check with the indication of specific art.


Although I reread it and it turns out that the Micro fetish has come to an end, as well as dwarf characters.

I dunno, we shouldn't be so quick to guess. Most likely this rule will be underused (not that content with small or cute characters (which they said could stay) should be banned, just pedophilic content) as opposed to overused.

This is already guesswork - they themselves did not give any specifics or references to examples of what is possible and what is not, forcing artists to strengthen self-censorship and even unnecessarily censor themselves.


And it turns out that the rule is just stupid and it's better to leave everything as it was.

From the fender post:
There is also some confusion as to the extent of the changes that went live today. Section 2.7 of the Upload Policy has been in effect for many months with its current wording. The only thing that changed as of this update is our internal policy on Pokemon and Digimon. Pokemon and Digimon are now actionable, if presented as children, when they were not in the past.

Again, small or otherwise cute adults, Pokemon/Digimon or not, will not be removed unless they proportionally/anatomically represent a child.

I think this more means that drawing Scorbunny getting railed is no longer acceptable. You're still allowed to be a small adult.

I asked Dragoneer and now I expect an answer from him at least more accurate than it is written in the rule.

Anyway, I'm reading your Twitter.

"We're banning childlike proportions on a website that specifically markets itself towards people who draw a lot of stylised or oddly proportioned things" thanks cool FA team, I definitely needed this and not a blacklist.

I am now waiting for a wave of art in which there will be a protest or funeral of all the characters that are below 100 - 130 cm in height, because they are now recognized as children.

good news
https://twitter.com/echoenbatbat/st.....71622839189504

https://twitter.com/furaffinity/sta.....56224141991937

nice official comment. but subrule is really silly.

Oh, relax, no one will check all those arts that are laid out by hundreds of thousands every day - they are not so rich, and bots are looking for them only by tags.