FA going down crazy faster than I thought (ladies, beware...
2 years ago
I have been made aware of this tweet not long ago.
Here the pictures are about Mpregs (you got links to those pics further in the tweet and can judge their "dangerousity" by yourself) but it basically means this if you analyze it and make the logical connexions:
Ladies, FurAffinity does not allow you to have any kind of physical pleasure during pregnancy. If you do, you are considered to be pedophiles.
Is this really meant to "protect children"? For me, it rather shows FurAffinity is plainfully trampling on painfully acquired women's rights - no, not just women's rights, but basic recognition that women are also human beings, and thus has regressed back by at least a century in terms of mentality evolution.
Eagerly waiting for the next absurdity.
Here the pictures are about Mpregs (you got links to those pics further in the tweet and can judge their "dangerousity" by yourself) but it basically means this if you analyze it and make the logical connexions:
Ladies, FurAffinity does not allow you to have any kind of physical pleasure during pregnancy. If you do, you are considered to be pedophiles.
Is this really meant to "protect children"? For me, it rather shows FurAffinity is plainfully trampling on painfully acquired women's rights - no, not just women's rights, but basic recognition that women are also human beings, and thus has regressed back by at least a century in terms of mentality evolution.
Eagerly waiting for the next absurdity.
So this lunatic decision has been validated.
Bye bye pregnant sex, lol. This is so funny ; except for the few poor artists who still have confidence in this website.
I've only seen a couple real pedo promotors on IB, but they have been swiftly banned - including those who simply were talking about having been abused themselves, which doesn't seem fair to me for once for those who really wanted to get through their trauma through their art while clearly being against the thing
Uh huh. I'm no fan of MPreg, but I'm a fan of freedom of speech. Apparently FA Management is not.
Anybody remember, back a few months ago, when FA put out a call for new immoderators? I didn't realize they were looking for Stalinists.
Didn't think this nonsense (that is criminalizing anyone having sex with or being attracted to a pregnant woman) would make it here a good ten years later.
Mpreg may be silly, IMO, but I just don't get the logic here. We're talking about a completely fantasy based idea here that has absolutely nothing to do with sex with or sexualized children.
I see more and more persons here on FA who can't even apprehend the concept of irony
Did I misread that or something?
Can I get a link to this please so I can read it myself?
Well, don't know much what to do then, some screencaps maybe? Is it even allowed by FA-scist admins??
It's an unpleasant gray area where the site wants to protect... something... and the artist explores a kink that can be a bit much to some.
Muslims are something completely else, since the beginning the message was rather violent.
I don't know much about judes apart from the fact it's extremely sexist, even more than the two others.
THIS - IS - FAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Pixiv: the genitals must be censored for the next 60 millenia.
Inkbunny: No humans!
D.A.: oh fuck you
Mastodon/Pawoo/Baraag: reduced image quality and only 4 pics per post.