FA+
Shop
Fa rules and the purity competition
11 months ago
I dont think the new rules effect me at all as I only draw clean diaper art, so business as usual
My bluesky if u are going there: https://bsky.app/profile/kipa.bsky.social
However, it's kind of funny to see so many people try to claim there's nothing sexual at all about art focused on pissing and shitting. Having the diaper in-between the viewer and their bits doesn't magically make it not sexual in anyway I'm sorry
I know people r trying to push this idea it's not fair to ban it when its sfw kink stuff for them. But rules can't be made based on anecdotal "well it's actually not sexual for me at all!!!!"
The age regression stuff seems odd, and a few other things. But I kept seeing so many people post art of characters getting changed or characters with a bit
Of pee saying YEAH THIS ISNT SEXUAL AT ALL and OK it's not raunchy sure but
Be fr, rules based on the exact composition of an image would be ridiculous
Idk, I think ppl r just mad they can't get away with their kink stuff bc they've always felt superior to cub artists who are "the bad ones who draw literal cp!!!! My stuff isnt gross!!!" I think if a site doesn't allow nsfw of underage characters then YES blatant obvious fetish art of them focused on their butt and crotch would also be unacceptable. It seems logical to me even if I wouldn't do it.
There always seems to be a competition between who is the most pure babyfur/little/age regressor and deciding whose stuff is actually too far and disgusting. You can be grossed out by whatever, block people, hate it but still.
Normal people think all of us are freaks actually ! Ur shit is werid as hell too even if ur a pure 100% sfw age regressor bc of trauma. Pacis and diapers and toddler shows in ur 20s and 30s and shit r fucking werid get over it.
Idk if anyone will even see this and I'm sure I'll piss people off and I'm sorry but it's been bugging me a lot. Might delete it later when I'm less annoyed
EDIT: Just to be clear I don't have a problem with anyone who likes that stuff, but I just see the logical conclusion of this. I just think pretending theres no sexual or fetishy element is not the way to try and defend it and its disingenuous
My bluesky if u are going there: https://bsky.app/profile/kipa.bsky.social
However, it's kind of funny to see so many people try to claim there's nothing sexual at all about art focused on pissing and shitting. Having the diaper in-between the viewer and their bits doesn't magically make it not sexual in anyway I'm sorry
I know people r trying to push this idea it's not fair to ban it when its sfw kink stuff for them. But rules can't be made based on anecdotal "well it's actually not sexual for me at all!!!!"
The age regression stuff seems odd, and a few other things. But I kept seeing so many people post art of characters getting changed or characters with a bit
Of pee saying YEAH THIS ISNT SEXUAL AT ALL and OK it's not raunchy sure but
Be fr, rules based on the exact composition of an image would be ridiculous
Idk, I think ppl r just mad they can't get away with their kink stuff bc they've always felt superior to cub artists who are "the bad ones who draw literal cp!!!! My stuff isnt gross!!!" I think if a site doesn't allow nsfw of underage characters then YES blatant obvious fetish art of them focused on their butt and crotch would also be unacceptable. It seems logical to me even if I wouldn't do it.
There always seems to be a competition between who is the most pure babyfur/little/age regressor and deciding whose stuff is actually too far and disgusting. You can be grossed out by whatever, block people, hate it but still.
Normal people think all of us are freaks actually ! Ur shit is werid as hell too even if ur a pure 100% sfw age regressor bc of trauma. Pacis and diapers and toddler shows in ur 20s and 30s and shit r fucking werid get over it.
Idk if anyone will even see this and I'm sure I'll piss people off and I'm sorry but it's been bugging me a lot. Might delete it later when I'm less annoyed
EDIT: Just to be clear I don't have a problem with anyone who likes that stuff, but I just see the logical conclusion of this. I just think pretending theres no sexual or fetishy element is not the way to try and defend it and its disingenuous
I don’t like the purity competition that seems to be a never ending problem between babyfur, ABDL, agere, etc. Like there’s no resolution besides accepting you’re weird and lots of people won’t like it.
But I also do agree that people are reading the new rules way too subjectively? It doesn’t matter how little or how much people are turned on by wet/messy diapers and stuff. It’s not SFW to see wet/messy stuff in general so furaffinity said no, that’s p much it.
one time i posted a pic of a growlithe peeing like in a comedic way (to me), there were no bits and it was like the calvin hobbs peeing kind of sticker thing but people still insisted i mark it as mature and i felt it was a bit silly but could understand that really people cant know my intentions and i suppose i didnt truly know the original commissioner intention either at the end of the day
I empathize with people on the rule enforcement, but I honestly don’t think furaffinity really changed their babyfur rules much and the site will continue to survive either way
Like I get that perhaps the person drawing it isnt getting horny while doing so, or isnt intending for it to be porn of course. But there is, an obvious fetish element to it. I don't have the proper words to explain what I want to say, but it just doesn't come across as purely sfw to me. Even if the intention isn't to sexualize the character.
Like ive seen plenty of art with a wet diaper I didn't think was "sexual" but there is SOMETHING to it, the difference between if I'd share it to a page my family follow or not xD vs fully sfw furry art
But also, there are some fetishes that, when drawn, are only fetishes, whether someone gets off or not.
You can draw chubby characters without it being NSFW even if you get off to it, for example.
Context is very important.
I have been using inkbunny more and really like it!
But furaffinity is going the same path as deviantart and tumblr unless this changes and is in favor of the artists babyfur and abdl but as we are it seems to be going from bad to worse
I always compare it to farel art. It is 100% fine until some specific lines get crossed. Aka making the character full blown animal, and the other character of human intelligence. Or sexualizing real animals.
Do I think FA is fair? No they should go after zoos and people into beastiality just as hard since its the same core issue. Being having relations or sexualizing another living being that does not, and can not consent let alone understanding whats even happening. I know "it's just art!" But when people normalize qla taboo it can lead to issues in this case for volunrable childrean and animals.
Plus no logical person wants to see -18 or animal abuse porn.
I think FA just needs to police both equally, and assure those in the right that no they will not be affected. Babyfurs shouldn't be punished if they are doing everything right, and no -18 nsfw is being posted. It's just kind of a mess really.
Though ofc you can have adult ferals so it is a bit different, but they already have gone after small pokemon like eevee
I always wonder why age is the one illegal thing that is way too far, ive seen snuff gore porn on here that truly disturbed me
Agreed there and I have a small plush wolf character that possesses others durring the full moon to become a large plush werewolf on the hunt for snuggles, so it is all concerning:/
Honestly yeah. Everyone admits full on zoo or cub porn isn't ok, so why they go after every babyfur is kind of weird. And yeah some gore porn just kinda sucks to stumble upon.
before all this stuff they changed the rules about characters such as small pokemon and digimon saying they are too "child" coded, so "baby" pokemon like riolu and eevee fit
i am worried they will start targeting feral next
Or diapers r allowed but only if ur regressed or only if ur never horny ever it's like OMG
I just think people need to learn they can't control and micromanage everyone... you can't control people's thoughts
Lefties have big control freak issues since u mention politics lol but think only conservatives do
Furries saying they don't like diapers because it's "gross" and therefore they believe they have the right to insult us by calling us blanket statement as P words, is the exact same logic used against gay people. I grew up enduring lesbophobia and biphobia so when folks are giving me the same icky tummy feeling over other sexual minority statuses and fetishes, it just squicks me out because it's a warning sign that authoritarianism is coming(and I don't care if the DICKtator is a leftist or rightist; I don't appreciate boots on my neck over my queer sexuality that doesn't harm anyone!).
Im trying to be careful as well and don't rlly post a lot of human art here
If my friends come up with backups of the pictures, they will eventually be reuploaded.
Also I'll totes go follow ya on IB! I love unique characters. Also lmao removing SL caps. FA has become weak.
People try to jump through hoops all the time by claiming stuff isn't a kink. Just because you don't get your jollies off doesn't mean it isn't fetishy in nature, ya know?
Though I don't consider myself a little anymore I'll always support those who enjoy it regardless of how they do. If only FA would implement a blacklist system instead of banning shit lol
Or maybe they just won't let anyone else work on it xD
I guess it might be for people in different countries but idk if ppl r saying it bc of that or the way a lot of twitter folks say it lolol
Like if more people joined it would be less known for only 1 thing ya know
Actual child rapists get away with real sex crimes all the time. I know occasionally the law makes an example out of a weeb who tries to cross the border with porn on a laptop, but otherwise generally you're safe. I've only noticed news stories of predators being caught and having fictional porn MIXED with abuse images and that's why they were in shit.
Typically you have to be a ACTIVE danger to society before the law will do anything against you. Even then, it's disgusting how many people have been molested and their abusers never got brought to justice. Worrying about cartoon porn seems stupid in the face of all that.
I'm just tired of the pointless moral grandstanding refusal to ever so much as consider using inkbunny, even if only as a backup, and instead stick exclusively with this community that actively wants them gone. Do they think they're winning some optics battle doing this?
I mean, well I think there is a bias tbh...bc I like i said to someone else earlier
There's gore snuff nsfw, there's incest on here, and feral beasty stuff. That's all illegal irl too
And yeah, I agree, the mods seem fairly hypocritical with what they’re allowing