SFM!
a year ago
General
1984 was not meant to be used as an instruction manual.
So I've noticed a trend about people hating on SFM because of it's limitations and I'd like to put across my opinions about it.
Not everyone has a powerful PC that can handle Blender, most of us have to make do with what we have. yes you may have access to advanced liquid physics and advanced tools for animation in general, but most of us don't. We have to do the same as what most of us did in the second world war, we make do with what we have, we're thankful for all the models we get and we're thankful for the fact that we're even able to make the images we do in the first place.
so if you're a blender user, I'm not going to chastise you for using it, however I will chastise you for looking down your noses at SFM users due to the fact that we either prefer it or do not have a computer powerful enough to use blender.
Not everyone has a powerful PC that can handle Blender, most of us have to make do with what we have. yes you may have access to advanced liquid physics and advanced tools for animation in general, but most of us don't. We have to do the same as what most of us did in the second world war, we make do with what we have, we're thankful for all the models we get and we're thankful for the fact that we're even able to make the images we do in the first place.
so if you're a blender user, I'm not going to chastise you for using it, however I will chastise you for looking down your noses at SFM users due to the fact that we either prefer it or do not have a computer powerful enough to use blender.
FA+

I also had another pc, an Athlon 3000G, where I did some renders of my Renamon and even did fur simulation with it.
At first I started using 3ds max but Arnold renderer refused to even start if the CPU didn't had SSE 4.1 instructions (phenom II lacks these)