FA+
Shop
Journal: Centaur/Taur p0rn question and debate.
6 months ago
I been questioning this challenging grey area question. Is centaur/Taur pornagraphy and sexual romantic attraction is b3stiallity? Due to being part humanoid above attached to body of feral animal below.
It techally the Taur can get away with it because of half humanoid body with eligible adult human intelligence and cognition with capable of consent. The bottem half animal body that kickstart the tuff morality question.
My concern is the possible feral p0rn aspect that people will develop sexual attraction to fetishise and sexualise animal into arousal. I do not want people to get sexual trigger when encounter and contact with regular animal in real life.
Then has the desire to inflict on animals and then to people as animal cruelity is sympton link to harm on human being. It is possible the Taur is less likely and acceptable in p0rnography and sexual romantic attraction relationship but if any arousal on feral animal in real life, it's best to cut ties to Taur p0rnography to avoid triggers and seek helpline. It is hard but don't let temptation corrupt into evil and just prevent it now.
It is grey area debate that may be unsolved and struggle to conclusion that cause division in communities: both furries, fantasy and more.
What's my opinion on Taur p0rn?
Not much b3stiality as it part humanoid body but unsure about bottem feral body. I'm aware it may cause the pipeline but i'm very conflicted on this that i struggle to get it resolve into conclusion.
What's your opinion on this debate?
But if i accidentally cause a furry and fantasy genre controversy, sorry i caused a sparked the flame. It's something bothering me in morality and mental health.
I'm against z00philia/b3stiality especially feral p0rn (Animal abuse p0rn) as it desensitised, sexualised and fetishise animal into sexual romantic arousal attraction and cause developing desire and sensitive triggers into commiting the act in real life which is sympton of becoming abuser and murderer, thus seel the unforgivable fate and destroy the entire life. Animal victim will become troubling unstable behavour and act that prone to aggresive from PTSD which chance non-recovered will provoke violant will get seize under athourity's custody and get euthanised instead of rehab.
Basically victims are doomed from beginning of evil incident and that's why perpetrators deserve to be unvalidated, discredited, disowned, forfeit and prosecuted. Also another that's why we need victim support on their safeguarding, cutting ties to perpetrator in complete isolation away from their perpetrator in order to be safe and recovery in counsilling. Sorry i might gone off rail thus slipping into justice stuff but i have to keep reminding everyone about this serious thing to prevent harm like what happen to me on emotional/pyscological domestic abuse.
It techally the Taur can get away with it because of half humanoid body with eligible adult human intelligence and cognition with capable of consent. The bottem half animal body that kickstart the tuff morality question.
My concern is the possible feral p0rn aspect that people will develop sexual attraction to fetishise and sexualise animal into arousal. I do not want people to get sexual trigger when encounter and contact with regular animal in real life.
Then has the desire to inflict on animals and then to people as animal cruelity is sympton link to harm on human being. It is possible the Taur is less likely and acceptable in p0rnography and sexual romantic attraction relationship but if any arousal on feral animal in real life, it's best to cut ties to Taur p0rnography to avoid triggers and seek helpline. It is hard but don't let temptation corrupt into evil and just prevent it now.
It is grey area debate that may be unsolved and struggle to conclusion that cause division in communities: both furries, fantasy and more.
What's my opinion on Taur p0rn?
Not much b3stiality as it part humanoid body but unsure about bottem feral body. I'm aware it may cause the pipeline but i'm very conflicted on this that i struggle to get it resolve into conclusion.
What's your opinion on this debate?
But if i accidentally cause a furry and fantasy genre controversy, sorry i caused a sparked the flame. It's something bothering me in morality and mental health.
I'm against z00philia/b3stiality especially feral p0rn (Animal abuse p0rn) as it desensitised, sexualised and fetishise animal into sexual romantic arousal attraction and cause developing desire and sensitive triggers into commiting the act in real life which is sympton of becoming abuser and murderer, thus seel the unforgivable fate and destroy the entire life. Animal victim will become troubling unstable behavour and act that prone to aggresive from PTSD which chance non-recovered will provoke violant will get seize under athourity's custody and get euthanised instead of rehab.
Basically victims are doomed from beginning of evil incident and that's why perpetrators deserve to be unvalidated, discredited, disowned, forfeit and prosecuted. Also another that's why we need victim support on their safeguarding, cutting ties to perpetrator in complete isolation away from their perpetrator in order to be safe and recovery in counsilling. Sorry i might gone off rail thus slipping into justice stuff but i have to keep reminding everyone about this serious thing to prevent harm like what happen to me on emotional/pyscological domestic abuse.
