Shocking realization.
16 years ago
Before, I submitted that art earlier in the day to see if it'd be popular, or more popular than other pics. I'm shocked at how little a shockwave it made.
In my opinion, it's hard to do a controlled experiment with something as subjective as art and its subject matter. However, I'm convinced that WHEN a picture is uploaded also determines the reaction of the viewer.
This is a kind of shock to me. Before, I figured it was at least the subject matter or talent I had. But now I also realize it's important, initially, WHEN you submit the picture. Ultimately, it should grow, and its eventual size is determinant of your talent... but at first, it's a different story.
Does this make any sense? D:
In my opinion, it's hard to do a controlled experiment with something as subjective as art and its subject matter. However, I'm convinced that WHEN a picture is uploaded also determines the reaction of the viewer.
This is a kind of shock to me. Before, I figured it was at least the subject matter or talent I had. But now I also realize it's important, initially, WHEN you submit the picture. Ultimately, it should grow, and its eventual size is determinant of your talent... but at first, it's a different story.
Does this make any sense? D:
FA+
Views from watchers: They're watching you because they have some level of interest in your art and will provide a steady base of views.
Spontaneous views: These are probably the biggest wild card, as they'd come from people catching the thumbnail on the front page/recent submissions section and following the link based on knowing your name or being intrigued by the thumbnail/title. This can be affected, as noted, by the time of posting. At some times of the day, there's more traffic with new submissions to send yours further back. At others, there are fewer people looking for random art from the front page, and so it has more time to get buried.
Referrals: These are from people noticing and following the links in other people's faves list. These are somewhat random, but they'll be driven by people who've liked a piece enough to fave it, which comes down to the art's appeal. You'd also get some from people who're chatting and tell a friend to check out the submission.
I, as the only example I can reliably provide, try to check out the pages of people who watch/fave the stuff I've posted. I'll browse their submissions and favorites to see what they also have done and have liked. I often find new artists to watch in this way. I've also been known to go to the page of an artist I'm watching and see what they've faved recently. I, conversely, don't favorite individual pieces of art much at all. I almost never check out the front page submissions either, as I have enough from watched artists and following up new interest.
Anyhoo... more ramblings from the wordy tiger.
I think the biggest contribution to views has to be referrals, especially active ones. So the problem is, "Are people able to share your work everywhere and to a large audience? ANd does your work merit such a share?"
I suppose ultimately no, for me-- I rarely draw anything that isn't a niche lately.
Thanks for the post. I'm used to mostly watchers composing all my views/favorites, so i'm surprised tha tso few showed upa t the recent inflation pic :O
I also find I get a small influx of views and comments on something, then a week or two later I get another one.
Yeah. I know what you mean about that influx and being paid attention to. I think waiting a few days helped me out, but not magnanimously. D:
I'm glad, though. Gel deserves more attention <:3
This is news to me! my mind is blown!
Hide the actual picture behind a good thumbnail also increases views. Specially if the image is small/zoomed out.
Thanks, Minnie.
it can be disappointing at times (attention on crap, no attention on boners, random ahigh ttention on boners, low attention on fully coloured works etc.) so all in all I dun get it.
*happy sigh* Ah, Google.
BRB, writing crossover fanfiction between FA and Google~ <#