It is no real lose really. For ever "artist" that charges a high price for a less than worthy "sketch" you will find several artists that can do it better and cheaper even.
If you're talking about Gideon's 2-minutes boring stiff-posed photocopied-repetitive 30-35$ sketches at furry cons, I think I can name you a few people.
More power to them, I say. If they've worked their way to that kind of popularity and people will pay that much for their art, good for them. A lot of it is up to supply and demand. If a popular artist doesn't want to be swamped with work and can get a high price for relatively little effort, then it'd be silly not to. :)
But on the subject, I've seen some fairly mediocre artists charge up the butt for work making them even MORE popular. It's like people see the high price and equate that with good work when it's really not. People are strange. :P
Artists.. depending on their skill will make MORE money from doing art if they keep there prices the same but improve on art. Rather then charging 150-200 Dollars for a colored pic....
You will have more people purchase art if you keep prices low..
But ..... they get greedy.... >.>
And yes.. i agree with you on this... its ridiculous sometimes
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Learn More
But on the subject, I've seen some fairly mediocre artists charge up the butt for work making them even MORE popular. It's like people see the high price and equate that with good work when it's really not. People are strange. :P
JUST PROCESSING AND HANDLING!
Artists.. depending on their skill will make MORE money from doing art if they keep there prices the same but improve on art. Rather then charging 150-200 Dollars for a colored pic....
You will have more people purchase art if you keep prices low..
But ..... they get greedy.... >.>
And yes.. i agree with you on this... its ridiculous sometimes