house-cleaning
15 years ago
You know what? I've spent these last months submitting pictures I extracted from my personal drives in a completely random way.
So I've been obliged to review hundreds of pictures and compare them with my FA gallery to determinate what I've already posted or not.
I put them in a separate folder. It's a bad solution in my humble opinion. Why Linux desktop environments don't natively integrate file tagging?
So I've been obliged to review hundreds of pictures and compare them with my FA gallery to determinate what I've already posted or not.
I put them in a separate folder. It's a bad solution in my humble opinion. Why Linux desktop environments don't natively integrate file tagging?
For example, it would have been nice If I would have been able to tag the files I submitted to FA with a 'submitted' tag within my computer. It's only a piece of information related to a short-term need. It's not an intrinsic picture property. That's one of the reasons why I don't want to put it into -says- EXIFF meta-data of JPG file headers.
I might give you tons of usage of such a tag storage. And If you want to know, I wish it could be more than just tags. For example, I wish I could link a B&W picture with its colored counter-part.
That being said, I could have put Linux logical links from a "submitted" folder up to the files (even last Windows releases can handle fully transparent file links). But of course, those links are broken once one moves or renames the targeted files. And it's hard to find which folders a given file is linked in. And if one copies a file, the links are not cloned. And so on.
Some Linux filesystems allow to put meta-properties on files, but there's no user friendly interface on top of these features plus the data are mostly ignored and lost by the rest of the Linux system (e.g. backup tools). That's sad.
Hu... sorry for the technical declamation.