BUT THEY MIGHT DO IT IN REAL LIFE! >:U

People are designed to draw connections where none exist. >_>
People are stupid.

Just kidding, btw. :p

People are feared about things they don't understand.

You're no different than the Furry-hating trolls, you know that? :)

How so?

Also, your lack of logic fits in perfectly with this Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.ph.....gid=2210732485

Your false logic is identical to those who claim all Furries rape animals and molest children because they all fap to furry porn.

"I find that stereotype incredibly stupid."

Thank you for proving that you're a complete hypocrite. :)

No, but it's the SAME as saying those that like cub art are pedos. Same false logic.

You got lawyered. The direct contradiction is in your own writing.

I rest my case. :)

Give it up, hypocrite. You're only digging yourself a deeper grave.

I can't respect hypocrisy.

Talking to a mirror?

I've already proven your hypocrisy. You have no credibility now. XD

I already did, multiple times. Apparently, you're deaf. LOL

I'll explain it again.

You claim that all those that like cub art are pedophiles. That is the SAME logic that anti-furry trolls use to say all Furries are zoopliles. You said you don't like that stereotype, BUT YOU USE THE SAME KIND OF STEREOTYPING YOURSELF.

Clear enough, hypocrite?

... If you can't see the blatant hypocrisy in that post, you're blind.

"Okay now that we have ruled out the innocent part, what do we have left?"

No, it's not ruled out. How many innocent adult pictures have you seen? Hmm? By the way, I happen to find the expressions of curiosity that the artists capture on cub's faces to be quite good.

Also, not all those that like cub art find underage humans attactive.


USING YOUR OWN LOGIC:

Furries are zoophiles. Take away the animal part and you just have humans. Why not watch regular cartoons? Because it's not animals.


Give it up, hypocrite. You're digging your grave deeper and deeper every time you post.

Also, you can't be "all ears" if we're typing, so it's back on you once more. :)

1980? Try like...the 30's or so. Prior to WWII at the very least.

Oh noes, someone doesn't agree with you - THEY MUST BE A TROLL!!!!11oneone

You know that's not what I'm saying.

Bullshit.

Yes, bulls do shit.

These people whining about cub porn are calling those that like it pedophiles. It's the same false logic that anti-furry trolls use to call all furries zoophiles, but the anti-cubs hate that.

I'm calling the anti-cub whiners hypocrites, not trolls, because they are acting in direct contradiction to their stated beliefs.

You seem to be forgetting some very basic facts here, so I'll reiterate what Clayton has said:

Your logic makes absolutely noo sense.

Not all furries are zoophiles because:
Not all furries find real live animals sexually attractive.

A zoophile is interested in REAL animals, NOT humanoid ones. Sometimes it overlaps with furry, but that isn't always 100% the case. A pedophile is interested in CHILDREN, and it DOES apply to humanoid ones, as there is a HUMAN CHILD'S BODY involved. I fail to see how this can be construed as hypocrisy on anyone's part - it's like you're deliberately twisting the argument around so that it reads, "Oh you don't like kiddies, so you're a dogfucker instead, then?"

And, uh... You are a hypocrite yourself, since you're accusing folks of being zoophiles, but seem okay with being a cub lover yourself.

Reread what he said there. Then read his own accusation.

Clayton:
Not all furries are zoophiles because:
Not all furries find real live animals sexually attractive.[/i]

He also went to say anyone that likes cub art is a pedophile, using the same logic he is denouncing. Therefore, he is acting in contradiction.

I enjoy cub art, and I don't find human children attractive. I am simply taking his false logic and returning it to him to prove a point. Remember the "Golden Rule?" I'm enforcing that.

Next time, actually read the posts before you make yourself look like an idiot again.

No, I can read just fine - you're just using a straw-man.

No, I am mirroring his false logic to prove a point.

Also, good job on moving from "attacking the argument" to "attacking the person".

Want me to get Dragoneer involved? 'Cause I'm pretty sure he can be just as vocal as we are.

Go ahead. Also, go back and read what I wrote. I didn't call you an idiot. I said you're making yourself look like one.

Dragoneer don't got a problem with cub porn tho yknow. Hermie's got a point.

Are those that like rape art rapists? nope

Are those who like vore art cannibals? nope

ARE PEOPLE THAT LIKE FURRY PORN ZOOPHILES?! nope

I mean i dont think everything needs to be banned, but people do have their opinions. they just want to prove that their opinions are right or whatever.

I'll repeat it from my journal, since I've FINALLY got it now:

Furry art isn't zoophilia because of the HUMAN aspect. But for cub lovers, that human aspect goes from adult to child, which means the HUMAN part they're into is preadolescent. What you posted is, to be honest, a rather poor analogy - I agree that lumping furry art to zoophiles is rather silly, but I fail to see why comparing cub porn to pedophilia would make anyone a dumbass, as they BOTH involve a child's body. So, yeah, it's a valid comparison, but I'm not going to go onto the moral ramifications on either, as it's not really any of my business to do so.

Not always. A good majority of the cub art I like is when the artists capture facial expressions of mixed feelings. Show me a piece with an adult having the thoughts of "WTF" and "OMGYES" and it'll probably be added to my favorites.

I enjoy cub art. I repeat, ART. Does that make me a pedo? Absolutely not.

Just because your country is now considering drawn child porn to be the equvalent of actual pornography doesn't suddently make everyone that might like the artwork aspect pedophiles. That is an incorrect assumption using false logic, and wrongfully focusing on only a single aspect.

So, to modify your own words, furry cub art is not pedophilia because of the ART aspect.

But furry art is not human because of the ANIMAL aspect and it involves an animal's body. Nothing normal about it, the ANIMAL part is the most important part of furry art. Therefore by your logic it IS zoophilia. You can't possibly say it isn't. So do you really want to have sex with an animal?

Do cub art fans really want to have sex with a child?

I drawn angry beavers porn, do I really want to have sex with a beaver?

Of course not. how can we possibly draw the line with cub art when if you look at it under a microscope the entire furry fandom looks like it's is based in beastiality?

I think we're all turned on by the MENTALITY of the characters. The antro-furries are turned on by the thought of human's true animal nature. The cub art fans are turned on by the childlike mentality and naiveness maybe? Cartoon fanart fans maybe turned on by their percieved relationship with the characters they've come to know inimately through the television. Furries have mostly mental attraction to the art.

The mind is the sexiest part of the body. Think about it.

I agree with you 100%

Now, I don't like cub porn. Because...well it's just disturbing. O.=.o But I don't care that FA hosts cub porn. Ya know why? Because all the cub porn is marked as cub porn so I don't click it and see it.

Who knows though. Some furries who look at cub porn might be pedophiles irl. But that's just coincidence. Doesn't mean that everyone who looks at it is an rl pedophile.

But anyways, these people need to stop bitching at FA. FA doesn't force them to look at it.

At the very least, perhaps FA could compromise and program the server to block cub porn from users who specify that they don't want to see it in their profile settings.

Just as some (and some in the logic sense means more than one) furries might be zoophiles, or rapists, etc. Most aren't, and of the few who have pedophilic tendencies (and there are far fewer pedophilic furrs than there are zoophile furrs, that I'm sure of)... even less will actually go out and actually harm a child.

That's another key distinction. A child abuser is a pedophile, but a pedophile is not necessarily a child abuser.

/agree

Cub art isn't my thing but i can't imagine the logic behind banning it. Hell, i find vore /gore way more disturbing. But hey, they are just drawings. Sure maybe there are some people who look at cub porn who are actually pedos, and there might be some people who look at vore that actually want to eat people, there are some people who listen to rap songs about shooting people and actually go out and shoot people, there are some people who listen to rock songs about suicide and actually kill themselves. Those people are morons, just because they are stupid should we punish the rest of society? By the same logic all violent movies and shows should be banned, because people actually do violent stuff. Dumb kid watches a karate movie, first thing he does after is kick his sister in the head and break her neck, who's to blame? The kid or the movie? The kid is, he did it. No matter how hard they try to rationalize that it's the movie's fault, the movie didn't kick her in the head. But of course nothing is anyone's fault, they are always a victim, total lack of personal responsiblility.

Not one piece of cub art has been responsible for a child being molested, a drawing can't molest a kid, sick fuck pedos are responsible. If there was no cub art in the world, there would still be molestations. If we ban cub art we affirm that it's somehow not the pedo's fault he did it, he's just a victim. Fuck that.

That being said, i still find cub art disturbing, not not quite as much as scat/watersports/gay/inflation/etc. I'd just as soon never see another fecal pic again! *pukes*

:)