Oh, you mean like me? :P

Well, I for one love being uncut. First it feels just better when masturbating, or getting masturbated, or doing anything sexual.

I also think it looks just better, especially hot if you grab the dick and pull it back to slowly reveal the head.

Also, HAHAHA, you said you get laid! :P

Well, yes, I actually DO get RL sex every once in a while, you know >:P

How do you know it feels better? Have you been both cut and uncut? :P

My mate is cut. :B

So we talked about it and compared stuff.

And the fact that one of the reasons foreskin was made is that it should increase the stimulation, so there. :P

So you talked to the guy that invented foreskins?

<..<

Are you joking?

If yes, bad one. :P

No, I talked to my circumcized mate. And its a scientific fact that the foreskin is there for increase of sexual stimulation and to guard the glans.

How does he know why the foreskin's there?

Okay, seriously? Why are you asking all this? <..<

I said SCIENTIFIC. Its a fact established by scientists it was made to protect your glans and increase sexual pleasure by increasing the stimulation when it rubs back and forth over the head. Plus, when you're circumcised the nerve endings on your glans are less receptive since the mellow out to not be overstimulated by tha unprotected glans rubbing for example against the insides of your pants.

Seriously, what is your business asking these questions? Do you want to make fun of me? Are you so much against uncut cocks?

And stop asking about my mate please. <..<

I'm not really asking about your mate...

I'm just saying how the hell do the scientists know it was MADE for an increase in sexual pleasure when they didn't create the foreskin? That's like saying the foot was made for the purpose of being ticklish. Scientific fact.

Well I guess its how scientists go. they open up a theory, look if they can prove it. Once its proven to an extent and most agree on it, its gets set as a fact, until someone can unprove it.

Like I said, the first and foremost task of it is to keep the glans safe, or at least keep it from getting dry and rubbing against stuff so that it doesn't desensibilizes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreskin#Functions

You can prove that it does protect the glans and it does increase stimulation, but no one can prove what it was MADE to do. I'd be more inclined to believe the protection, less inclined to believe the evolutionary purpose of the foreskin is to add sexual pleasure.

Sorry, it just bothers me when people talk in absolutes.

Is okay, but I wasn't really talking in absolutes, just staing what science has established as current facts and that in the end its a matter of taste if you like uncut penises or not.

Sure, I still don't like it that most people get circumcized without the option to say something against it in the US, as children, but then again its a moot point. You live with your parents at that point, you're too young to make your own decisions so they do it for you.

As I said, in the end its a taste thing.

Not sure what to say about foreskins in particular. As for sheaths, there might be an overlap with the love some folks have for tanlines: the thought of seeing something usually hidden.

Eh, people have aesthetic preferences. It doesn't strike me as all that weird. (For the record, if we're doing TMI sharing: I don't really have a huge preference either way. I've only been with cut dudes, but that's pure coincidence, and I don't exactly run screaming at the sight of a foreskin.)

At least you're not trying to stretch it back. :P

o.o

I've never much cared for the look of a sheath, even if I appreciate the added protection it'd offer.

Hence why I usually like the idea of characters with slits and internal genitalia instead.

Uncut guys are more sensative, which means they cum faster, which means they suck at sex and they cum like they're virgins about to pop their cherries.

<..<

I hope you're joking. :P

Actually I'm uncut and I take some time to cum. So does my uncut buddy. And a lot of uncut men.

An interesting discussion. I am not male so please don't bite my head off for commenting. I am old enough to be called mature and venture an opinion based on the experience and discussion amongst a broad spectrum of males and females of various ages, on this and similar topics.

From my point of view a males ability to achieve orgasm or to gauge their stamina and please a partner... being cut or uncut plays little relevence except on a mental level. In the case of my partners and male friends, over time (a mixture of cut and uncut) their stamina, their enjoyment and preformance was more based on how fit they were, how tired, if they were hungry or other issues.

I don't doubt that a certain amount of sensitivty may be lost with circumsision however as this usually occurs when a male is a babe, he generally knows no differece and finds his own level of enjoyment to, in most cases, to be satisfying. It tends to be a mental attitude that effects a mans enjoyment more so than to be cut or uncut. Being told you can't be anygood at sex because your cut/uncut has more effect than the fact of being cut/uncut. I will also point out that most sensible males if they are not satisfied they will find a way around it and look at other methods to increase their enjoyment.