FA+
Shop
A musing on certain artists drawing babyfurs...
15 years ago
... yeah, always a good controversy, eh?
I won't name the artist in particular - 90 percent of his work is basically 'here's a character, with the long and convoluted background!', apart from commissions but if you follow him, you can probably figure it out.
Anyway, he posted three pics of underaged characters lately. They weren't, on the whole, any different than his usual stuff, the characters were suspiciously well-developed for their age, and while nude (and with surprisingly large genitalia)they weren't explicitly drawn, y'know, having sex or anything like that, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
No, what amused me was the big warning on it and the "If you are offended, you clicked through it is your own action". No, YOU are the one taking advantage of FA's fucked up guidelines to post child porn, dude. Fictional children, sure, so I don't feel compelled to rain fire and ash on your neighborhood and sow the grounds with salt, but still.
I ain't a stick in a mud on these matters by a long shot. My uncanny valley is an uncanny pothole; even if I don't particularly dig it I generally accept it. Just you'd think the dude would, at least, not want to associate it with his rep and such.
Oh, wait, I forgot. Furries. Never mind, folks, back to your homes.
I won't name the artist in particular - 90 percent of his work is basically 'here's a character, with the long and convoluted background!', apart from commissions but if you follow him, you can probably figure it out.
Anyway, he posted three pics of underaged characters lately. They weren't, on the whole, any different than his usual stuff, the characters were suspiciously well-developed for their age, and while nude (and with surprisingly large genitalia)they weren't explicitly drawn, y'know, having sex or anything like that, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
No, what amused me was the big warning on it and the "If you are offended, you clicked through it is your own action". No, YOU are the one taking advantage of FA's fucked up guidelines to post child porn, dude. Fictional children, sure, so I don't feel compelled to rain fire and ash on your neighborhood and sow the grounds with salt, but still.
I ain't a stick in a mud on these matters by a long shot. My uncanny valley is an uncanny pothole; even if I don't particularly dig it I generally accept it. Just you'd think the dude would, at least, not want to associate it with his rep and such.
Oh, wait, I forgot. Furries. Never mind, folks, back to your homes.
GabrielLaVedier
~gabriellavedier
I watch someone who posts up almost nothing but cub stuff, of the ridiculously cute variety, and commissions of the same. I do it because they're also a musician and have covered some Voltaire songs.
