Safe soft vore in real life
15 years ago
I posted this on a forum, but thought to paste it in a journal too. So, here it is:
This is something I've been thinking about for the last few days, and thought might bring more life into the forum as well as be an interesting debate. What do you think would be required for soft vore to be safely done in real life? And what are the possibilities for such a thing to be possible within reason?
I'll start with my own opinion on the matter. At this moment, I'm not sure if it's completely and entirely impossible. I got to the conclusion there are five crucial requirements for soft vore to be possible in real life. These would be:
1) Both the prey and especially the predator would need to be aware it's not an easy and entirely comfortable process, and be willing and prepared to go through with it. Any being attempting vore in real life would suffer light stomach pains, that they would need to be able to handle and not panic from (otherwise they'd both put their selves in danger). Prey would only risk minor skin burns from the acids... likely not worse than sun burns over a short period of time spent in the stomach.
2) A clear size difference between the prey and pred (first physical requirement). Enough so the prey isn't squeezed too hard inside the predator, and the predator doesn't have his insides forced from swallowing something too big. The prey would also need to be small enough so the predator doesn't risk chocking on it. Over my estimation, the difference between a mouse and a wolf would be the border of that limit. Prey should also use some oils to make itself slippery and easy to slide.
3) The prey would need air inside the stomach. This could be achieved in two different ways: Either the predator breathes fresh air in their stomach (every 30 seconds at most), or the prey goes in with a hose that leads outside and they can breathe through. The second would require the pred to accept having a hose leading from their maw into their stomach, which would prolly feel like patients with ulcer problems who have that done to them in the hospital. The hose would need to be strong enough and not risk getting gutted or ripped.
4) The amount of time the prey sits inside would need to be well timed and limited. If he sits there for too long, he risks getting considerable damage from the acids. As for the predator, he would risk severe stomach pains as his stomach would treat what it can't digest as rotten food, and lead to pains and illness. I'm estimating 15-20 minutes at a time should be safe, but not more.
5) Lastly, the prey would need a way to get out safely. I see two possibilities again. Either the predator knows to regurgitate them (and / or the prey can climb out and help), or the prey would need to go inside tied to a rope. The second would once again require the pred to handle a rope leading from out of their stomach inside it. It would need to be a soft but strong material, that doesn't risk braking but also doesn't damage the insides of the predator when the prey pulls itself onto it. NOTE: The hose and rope could be the same, as long as the material is resistant enough.
In my opinion, these would be the five requirements for vore to be safely doable. Doing the above in real life does feel like a pretty impossible task... mostly due to humans not having many species that are larger than them. Still, I did think of a possibility, and this is what I came up with:
A person with a human body would need to find a creature that's large enough. The only ones that come to mind are rhinos, elephants, or giraffes (crocodiles too, but with them it would turn into hard vore unfortunately). Snakes such as anacondas aren't an option either, due to their stomachs also crushing their food before attempting to digest it (sad thing vore-wise, but it's how things are). For now, we could consider a rhino or elephant as a possibility.
The creature would likely need minimal training to not panic, as well as accepting such an act (otherwise this would be a form of abuse and wrong). The person would then need the following items: A strong hose and rope (since animals wouldn't know to breathe air in their belly or push the prey out at a given time), and optionally, a 2-liter bottle of oil and a water-proof lantern in case they wish to see inside.
The person would then securely tie one end of the rope to a solid object such as a wall or pillar, and secure one end of the hose in the same spot. Then apply the oil all over their body so they slide inside easily, and go all the way down the creature's gullet. He would keep the hose in his mouth and breathe through it like scuba gear. Once he'd start sensing either the acids burning his skin or the creature giving signs of stomach pains, he would gently climb up the rope and get back out through his maw.
I know some may find the idea silly, but I'm hopeful it might be doable to some point. What is your opinion on this, as well as your opinion on safe soft vore in real life at all? Would like to hear other ideas, and corrections to my own thoughts if they're incorrect.
This is something I've been thinking about for the last few days, and thought might bring more life into the forum as well as be an interesting debate. What do you think would be required for soft vore to be safely done in real life? And what are the possibilities for such a thing to be possible within reason?
I'll start with my own opinion on the matter. At this moment, I'm not sure if it's completely and entirely impossible. I got to the conclusion there are five crucial requirements for soft vore to be possible in real life. These would be:
1) Both the prey and especially the predator would need to be aware it's not an easy and entirely comfortable process, and be willing and prepared to go through with it. Any being attempting vore in real life would suffer light stomach pains, that they would need to be able to handle and not panic from (otherwise they'd both put their selves in danger). Prey would only risk minor skin burns from the acids... likely not worse than sun burns over a short period of time spent in the stomach.
2) A clear size difference between the prey and pred (first physical requirement). Enough so the prey isn't squeezed too hard inside the predator, and the predator doesn't have his insides forced from swallowing something too big. The prey would also need to be small enough so the predator doesn't risk chocking on it. Over my estimation, the difference between a mouse and a wolf would be the border of that limit. Prey should also use some oils to make itself slippery and easy to slide.
3) The prey would need air inside the stomach. This could be achieved in two different ways: Either the predator breathes fresh air in their stomach (every 30 seconds at most), or the prey goes in with a hose that leads outside and they can breathe through. The second would require the pred to accept having a hose leading from their maw into their stomach, which would prolly feel like patients with ulcer problems who have that done to them in the hospital. The hose would need to be strong enough and not risk getting gutted or ripped.
4) The amount of time the prey sits inside would need to be well timed and limited. If he sits there for too long, he risks getting considerable damage from the acids. As for the predator, he would risk severe stomach pains as his stomach would treat what it can't digest as rotten food, and lead to pains and illness. I'm estimating 15-20 minutes at a time should be safe, but not more.
5) Lastly, the prey would need a way to get out safely. I see two possibilities again. Either the predator knows to regurgitate them (and / or the prey can climb out and help), or the prey would need to go inside tied to a rope. The second would once again require the pred to handle a rope leading from out of their stomach inside it. It would need to be a soft but strong material, that doesn't risk braking but also doesn't damage the insides of the predator when the prey pulls itself onto it. NOTE: The hose and rope could be the same, as long as the material is resistant enough.
In my opinion, these would be the five requirements for vore to be safely doable. Doing the above in real life does feel like a pretty impossible task... mostly due to humans not having many species that are larger than them. Still, I did think of a possibility, and this is what I came up with:
A person with a human body would need to find a creature that's large enough. The only ones that come to mind are rhinos, elephants, or giraffes (crocodiles too, but with them it would turn into hard vore unfortunately). Snakes such as anacondas aren't an option either, due to their stomachs also crushing their food before attempting to digest it (sad thing vore-wise, but it's how things are). For now, we could consider a rhino or elephant as a possibility.
The creature would likely need minimal training to not panic, as well as accepting such an act (otherwise this would be a form of abuse and wrong). The person would then need the following items: A strong hose and rope (since animals wouldn't know to breathe air in their belly or push the prey out at a given time), and optionally, a 2-liter bottle of oil and a water-proof lantern in case they wish to see inside.
The person would then securely tie one end of the rope to a solid object such as a wall or pillar, and secure one end of the hose in the same spot. Then apply the oil all over their body so they slide inside easily, and go all the way down the creature's gullet. He would keep the hose in his mouth and breathe through it like scuba gear. Once he'd start sensing either the acids burning his skin or the creature giving signs of stomach pains, he would gently climb up the rope and get back out through his maw.
I know some may find the idea silly, but I'm hopeful it might be doable to some point. What is your opinion on this, as well as your opinion on safe soft vore in real life at all? Would like to hear other ideas, and corrections to my own thoughts if they're incorrect.
You may want to take it and see what result you get. Because human beings who possess empathy and have an actual capacity for emotion do not think this way.