It was a poo joke
14 years ago
General
My previous journal, I mean. Pay attention to the last line. When even my best and most observant friend missed it, I guess I made it too subtle. I'm sorry.
Do you want to know my actual stance on such things? The anthropic principle, basically. The universe is wonderful and all, but we are a product of it - our view of it will be necessarily biased because of this. Supernatural? I don't believe things "supernatural" enter the natural realm, so they have no bearing on it. If they did, they would be... natural. That doesn't mean we could explain them using known natural principles - we would just have to change what we know about those principles.
I actually don't think the question is very important... or even particularly interesting. The question of why we're here in the philosophical (rather than physical) sense implicitly assumes that a reason exists at all. I'm not sure there is a basis on which such an assumption can be made. Maybe we're here just for the lulz. Problem?
Do you want to know my actual stance on such things? The anthropic principle, basically. The universe is wonderful and all, but we are a product of it - our view of it will be necessarily biased because of this. Supernatural? I don't believe things "supernatural" enter the natural realm, so they have no bearing on it. If they did, they would be... natural. That doesn't mean we could explain them using known natural principles - we would just have to change what we know about those principles.
I actually don't think the question is very important... or even particularly interesting. The question of why we're here in the philosophical (rather than physical) sense implicitly assumes that a reason exists at all. I'm not sure there is a basis on which such an assumption can be made. Maybe we're here just for the lulz. Problem?
FA+

Re: the philosphic thingy wha do.. I'm a firm beleiver that we have not come to know alot of what there is to know. More annoyingly, there are some phenomena that, while they can be easily dismissed, can not always be easily explained. And because of that there's a LOT of scientists who deride studies into the 'supernatural' (read, currently not understood natural) phenoma that goes on around us. And hence, very very little time put into studying these phenomena. No matter though, the world keeps going round, and the IRS keeps demanding their money. :)
This interests me (I did a CS major). Care to elaborate a bit?
More annoyingly, there are some phenomena that, while they can be easily dismissed, can not always be easily explained. And because of that there's a LOT of scientists who deride studies into the 'supernatural' (read, currently not understood natural) phenoma that goes on around us.
I'd disagree with the reasoning underlying this statement. There are indeed things that cannot be easily explained - the accelerating expansion of the universe is one example that comes to mind. But claims of supernatural effects have thus far generally, if not exclusively, been subject to rather easy explanation. That is, they have been explained by the effects of human physiology and psychology, confirmation bias, ordinary statistical anomaly, mistakes, fraud, etc. etc. This is not dismissal, and scientists who deride frivolous studies into such things have good reason to. (Not all studies are frivolous, mind you. Studies of social psychological effects of beliefs in supernatural phenomena, for example, could be quite informative about human nature.)
Plenty of time has already been put into studying these phenomena, with no positive outcome to confirm they even exist as anything beyond the aforementioned natural effects. At some point, an intelligent person stops tyring, and instead spends time on something that might be more useful. As you rightly mentioned, there's still plenty of things we legitimately don't know.
Annny ways.. yeah. THE BOOTLOADER.. oh em ef gee.. It's a story, dude, a LONG story best told over a beer, honestly. ;) but, there are three cpu's. their major function is to provide serial communications control of a panning scanning tilting camera.
It was declared, a few weeks before they shipped, that they HAD to be field upgradeable.
SOoooo.. one cpu talks to the outside world, and sadly, it only has one extra uart, so since it had to talk to two other cpu's, we took it's uart tx line, ran it to the second cpu's, uart RX line, and the second cpu's uart tx, to the next one's uart rx and then from there back to the first cpu. a little token ring, or daisy chain.
So, one cpu has spi memory to store incoming data, so we store the initial program there, and the cpu has a bootloader now that listens for af ew seconds to the outside world, if it's not commanded into a mode to upload data to it's spi rom, it then goes into a boot mode where everyone starts talking on the ring to find out who has what revisions and if a new one is loaded into the spi rom, it sucks it out of there and into it's own eeprom program memory space.
if they are up to date, they just boot up. You can update any one cpu or all three if you want. the only one that updates it's own program memory space is the one that is not at the 'current' rev..
Clearly I'm leaving out a LOT of detail, such as space considerations (one cpu has 86 bytes of program memory space left. :P ) and what hapens when .......
sadly I was not afforded the time I needed to design it and implement it and debug it fully and kind of got, saddled with some code a consultant wrote... *GAawwwddd..*
The task itself is not particularly difficult, and is actually quite interesting, there are many components to it, I was jut not really afforded enough time to make sure all the paths are correct and overall i feel the thing to be.. ehhhhh.. not my best peice of work to date.
Gotta love consultants, too...
and yeah! it *IS* challenging.. I like it. overall, just don't like the time away from home so much is all.
and dang.. it DID get posted, I didn't know if it got through or not. looks like it did. :)
Maybe I was just in the wrong mood?