FA+
Shop
Porn as an Orientation Test @ Commission Slots 2/2 (Full)
14 years ago
HEALTH █████
ENERGY █████ (something about today just has me really tired)
ENDURING TECHNOLOGIES INFO
Current R.A.I.S. Donation Total: $147.38
Next Page: Aug 11th.
COMMISSION INFO
• Comic Slot - Preliminary Planning 1%
████████████████████
Prices are found on my front page
Click for my Terms of Service
This commission slot's raffle winner is
rubberpuppydog
█ Same drill. Post if you're interested in a commission slot. First two get it, the rest a raffle slot to be randomly picked next commission set.
█ So I stumbled across an interesting 'discussion' over an article about a women fearful that her boyfriend who was watching gay porn is thusly... gay. I found it kind of amusing the double standard that was set by the posters responding to the situation, at how females can be attracted to any sort of sexual situation, regardless of what kind of erotic content was shown; but the moment you suggest a straight man who look at gay porn without any reaction other than "eww gross, do not want" is automatically gay or bi.
Course there were people defending the utterly single-mindedness of men, at how it's straight sex or eww eww eww. Keep in mind they are talking about porn, and not the actual act of sex itself. Course I tried to apply this 'logic' or lack of really to myself, and I'm not sure what conclusion I'd be able to come up with. Personally I think I find sex a bit boring, regardless of gender. The stuff that interests me is strictly the bondage, and as such I enjoy seeing it regardless of gender. Does this label me 'bisexual?' in where I not really attracted to either gender, but simply the act of bondage?
I mean ultimately what I'm saying is that while I like bondage type porn, I'm ultimately not really attracted to either gender or the default acts of sex. Which I suspect puts me into the 'sick freak' category of sexual orientation.
Though speaking of single-mindedness, if the whole male stereotype was going to be boiled down, it would have to be "They are obsessed with holes, and most don't care what surrounds it." If it's gay or not, or if it makes them gay or not is rather irrelevant in my opinion, especially when all you need to do is blindfold a guy, and he'll probably get off one whatever hole you present him with. You know provided the hole isn't full of razorblades and spikes of course... though I wouldn't put it past some people... *shudders*
ENERGY █████ (something about today just has me really tired)
ENDURING TECHNOLOGIES INFO
Current R.A.I.S. Donation Total: $147.38
Next Page: Aug 11th.
COMMISSION INFO
• Comic Slot - Preliminary Planning 1%
████████████████████
Prices are found on my front page
Click for my Terms of Service
This commission slot's raffle winner is
rubberpuppydog█ Same drill. Post if you're interested in a commission slot. First two get it, the rest a raffle slot to be randomly picked next commission set.
█ So I stumbled across an interesting 'discussion' over an article about a women fearful that her boyfriend who was watching gay porn is thusly... gay. I found it kind of amusing the double standard that was set by the posters responding to the situation, at how females can be attracted to any sort of sexual situation, regardless of what kind of erotic content was shown; but the moment you suggest a straight man who look at gay porn without any reaction other than "eww gross, do not want" is automatically gay or bi.
Course there were people defending the utterly single-mindedness of men, at how it's straight sex or eww eww eww. Keep in mind they are talking about porn, and not the actual act of sex itself. Course I tried to apply this 'logic' or lack of really to myself, and I'm not sure what conclusion I'd be able to come up with. Personally I think I find sex a bit boring, regardless of gender. The stuff that interests me is strictly the bondage, and as such I enjoy seeing it regardless of gender. Does this label me 'bisexual?' in where I not really attracted to either gender, but simply the act of bondage?
I mean ultimately what I'm saying is that while I like bondage type porn, I'm ultimately not really attracted to either gender or the default acts of sex. Which I suspect puts me into the 'sick freak' category of sexual orientation.
Though speaking of single-mindedness, if the whole male stereotype was going to be boiled down, it would have to be "They are obsessed with holes, and most don't care what surrounds it." If it's gay or not, or if it makes them gay or not is rather irrelevant in my opinion, especially when all you need to do is blindfold a guy, and he'll probably get off one whatever hole you present him with. You know provided the hole isn't full of razorblades and spikes of course... though I wouldn't put it past some people... *shudders*
endium: >You know provided the hole isn't full of razorblades and spikes of course... though I wouldn't put it past some people... *shudders*
I know some people who are into guro and such (just drawn pics). While they get off on that stuff (or snuff, lol), they say it's not something they'd even consider doing in real life. I feel safe around those people and I know they wouldn't ever harm me (or anyone, for that matter), as it's just another weird fetish. I sometimes get off on things because of how disgusting and distasteful they are.
I don't understand why some people like feet or gore or BDSM, but as long as they're not harming anyone/anything I'm not going to judge.
Now that I'm thinking about it though, I'd totally like to see a scientific study where people exposed babies/young children to different stimuli and tried to track which fetishes developed. I don't think it would get much support, though: "Let us test your young children to determine the origins of sexual fetishes and pleasure!"
Who won the comic commission, anyways? I was hoping mine would win but hey. XD
I do have to agree with the above poster though...I can't watch just porn by itself. It doesn't do anything for me at all. If it doesn't have a good amount of bondage in it it's rather meh to me. However, add some nice bondage to the mix and focus more on that...now we're talking.
*hisses approvingly*
And, of course, a lot of people don't leave room for simple curiosity. "Hey, some people like X. Let me see what it's all about..." But, people even apply the idea that just looking at something can cause a problem to even mundane things. Harry Potter will turn you evil. Marilyn Manson will make you kill people. Smoking a joint will make you shoot up heroin until you die.
Think of it this way you have a low background sexuality, probably don't think of it much, but when a fetish is involved in this case bondage your interest spikes.
Anyway it's perfectly normal regardless of orientation. All people have them to one degree or another.
I love when people try and classify sexuality as normal or abnormal according to their own paradigm. Don't forget that being gay was classified as sexual deviancy as little as thirty years ago. Now it's a perfectly normal lifestyle. Societal paradigms shift over time. Hell in classic Greece and Rome it was practically anything goes. Ah the good old days.
Oh and mass produced porn is generally crap. Not liking bland depictions focusing on the sex act itself rather than the situation or who's involved doesn't say much more than you have good taste. Porn is quantity over quality. Even here. Or perhaps especially here on FA.
Even bondage porn (the kind I'm generally interested in) is in many cases explicit and mostly puts the bound characters in a position where the "parts" are easily shown when there'd be absolutely no reason other than explicit-ness to do so. Such drawings is not stuff that I want to see, but it's a reality here at FA, I suppose.
I feel the same exact thing, and even worst, i like RUBBE/LATEX bondage type porn, not just any kind, so i must be even freaker XDXDXD
Discovering that I can get along with guys sexually quite well and even love them, which both never really worked out for me with females, was something totally different.
So at least for me, I'd split those two.
And I'd also split the act of sex and the idea of love, at least a bit. Males (not only humans) will hump whatever they can get at, if it fullfills their desire to shoot their load. That's basic instinct. Love is a higher-level instinct to not fuck your buddy or the next tree-hole (or beer bottles.
I know think of this fear of gayness as a sign of weakness. Many seem to define themselves to a good part on manlyness, on male stereotypes. Anything which challenges those stereotypes thus challenges their very existence personally. Bullying those who are not the strong, math-hating cool gang hence is the same motive as open hate for gayness. Anything which is not clearly and definitely "straight" is considered "totally gay" and rejected - that's fear at work here. Ever noticed that everything is totally ok and acceptable as long as it's "a joke, not really meant that way"?
Females, on the other hand, cannot challenge this: either they love males (perfect, "I'm male, I'm wanted, I get fucked") or females ("I love females, everyone wants to fuck females"). It even works for inuendo, as used in advertisements. Ads try to sell an image/perception, of a "lucky life", portrayed by those happening to use a certain product. Males want to see females (regarding them as objects of desire), females want to see females (regarding them as placeholders for themselves).
And I reject the double-standard of "men should be straight", "females should be bi", along with the whole concept of expressing one's masculinity through acting "macho" and emotionless (the double-standard seems part of it, to avoid men acting too "gay"). That's just not for me, and I got sick of faking acting like "just another one of the guys" a long time ago. I can't shut down my empathy enough for it anyway. :p
The Kinsey Scale ftw.