FA+
Shop
Honest Opinion: Scott Adams to Men’s Rights Activists
14 years ago
Adult Account
Character Accounts
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archiv.....like-children/
* Reply from a deleted journal. *
Are women so out of control of our emotions that we can't be taken seriously or put in roles of leadership?
Women usually are naturally more emotional then men. It does fall down to hormones in that situation. We, since I'm a woman I say this, can overreact and follow emotions more than a man would. Some women have no control over emotions while others have perfect control. It will fall down to a personal level rather than any group-wide level.
For me it will depend on the woman. Whether or not they have control of their emotions. I've had experience and I am overemotional. I've also had experience in being ignored in favored of someone older and male. Even if I was right in the situation. Look back years ago and I could be taken seriously and was in a leadership position.
So really just to say again, it is all down to a personal level. It is impossible to be generalized since the hormonal balances in women vary by every single one. So an overemotional woman I would not want in a leadership spot. At the same time I don't want a completely unemotional one. Takes a balance.
Does might make right?
Not at all. Women get emotional. So do men. I wouldn't trust a man in the same way as a women if they fully give in and can't control themselves.
Is the word "equality" an ignorant expectation formed from women's inability to accept their weaknesses?
Different women, different answers. In the long run... sorry ladies, but it is an ignorant statement to make. When you get down to genetics, men are better than women in a lot of ways. They are the hunters. They're built different than us. Women can not do everything a man does. Vice versa on some things.
To explain better, think about a farm. Men and women can run it. It would take more women to do a man's job. Men are built for labor. Women are not. For hard work, heavy lifting, or anything else that would require physical strength, give it to a man. For things like raising a child, leave it to women. No offense to men, but human females were built the way we are, with the emotions, to connect and deal with children better than a man could.
If something like an office job was around, working at fast food, waiter/waitress, or something that doesn't require an excess of physical labor, either gender could do well. There is where you should see equality. Something either gender could do well. If there isn't, then it could be on a personal level. That is where things get fuzzy when you get down and dirty in details.
Well that was just my view. Wrote everything as I thought it up. Right or wrong, it is just my view. I wouldn't mind being questioned on them as questions make you think more. As long as it doesn't turn into hate. Pretty sure that is the one thing not wanted.
This was interesting to dig into my own brain.
* Reply from a deleted journal. *
Are women so out of control of our emotions that we can't be taken seriously or put in roles of leadership?
Women usually are naturally more emotional then men. It does fall down to hormones in that situation. We, since I'm a woman I say this, can overreact and follow emotions more than a man would. Some women have no control over emotions while others have perfect control. It will fall down to a personal level rather than any group-wide level.
For me it will depend on the woman. Whether or not they have control of their emotions. I've had experience and I am overemotional. I've also had experience in being ignored in favored of someone older and male. Even if I was right in the situation. Look back years ago and I could be taken seriously and was in a leadership position.
So really just to say again, it is all down to a personal level. It is impossible to be generalized since the hormonal balances in women vary by every single one. So an overemotional woman I would not want in a leadership spot. At the same time I don't want a completely unemotional one. Takes a balance.
Does might make right?
Not at all. Women get emotional. So do men. I wouldn't trust a man in the same way as a women if they fully give in and can't control themselves.
Is the word "equality" an ignorant expectation formed from women's inability to accept their weaknesses?
Different women, different answers. In the long run... sorry ladies, but it is an ignorant statement to make. When you get down to genetics, men are better than women in a lot of ways. They are the hunters. They're built different than us. Women can not do everything a man does. Vice versa on some things.
To explain better, think about a farm. Men and women can run it. It would take more women to do a man's job. Men are built for labor. Women are not. For hard work, heavy lifting, or anything else that would require physical strength, give it to a man. For things like raising a child, leave it to women. No offense to men, but human females were built the way we are, with the emotions, to connect and deal with children better than a man could.
If something like an office job was around, working at fast food, waiter/waitress, or something that doesn't require an excess of physical labor, either gender could do well. There is where you should see equality. Something either gender could do well. If there isn't, then it could be on a personal level. That is where things get fuzzy when you get down and dirty in details.
Well that was just my view. Wrote everything as I thought it up. Right or wrong, it is just my view. I wouldn't mind being questioned on them as questions make you think more. As long as it doesn't turn into hate. Pretty sure that is the one thing not wanted.
This was interesting to dig into my own brain.
It would help public perseption of this issue to become more realistic if the republicans would stop using triggerhappy idiotic women as their icons.