So....about bullying...
14 years ago
Recently there's been much commotion about a video put out by a Jonah Mowry, a bullied 8th grader. The video has been met with a tidal wave of emotional response and anti-bullying cries. This is of course the latest chapter in the fight against bullying, coming after a rash of suicidal teens, harassed to the point of not wanting to live anymore, and the "It Gets Better" campaign.
This is all fine and well, but it does leave me confused on some things. Namely, why the bullying outcry NOW? And where is society breaking down?
The reasons I ask this are simple. Nearly every kid gets bullied at some point. It's been the status quo of the schoolyard jungle since forever. Though I was lucky as far as bullying went, I still had a period from grades 7 - 8 where I was tossed by my mother from public school into a Catholic School. Going from an establishment where freedom of expression was acceptable, and everyone knew and liked me to one where no one knew who I was and the student body was strictly groomed to think certain ways and accept certain things wasn't the best transition, nor was it a well thought out idea on my mother's part. As a result, I wound up harassed quite a bit during school hours. How did I deal with it? Simple. I had friends at the nearby public schools, I had friends outside of school. I had things to do to keep me occupied at home, and was able to put it out of my mind after school hours.
Was I a rare case? No. In my neighbourhood, we had ALL been picked on at some point. And at some point we had been the ones doing the picking. Yes, if it went too far, adults would intervene, but there was never a one of us that wound up irreparably scarred or felt suicidal. It's just childhood. It's an unpleasant part of childhood, and it's no secret that children can be cruel little savages, but there it is.
But now in the 21st Century, things have apparently gotten much more savage. Bullying is now thought of as a crime. Victims are finding it harder to stand up for themselves, and parents and teachers aren't a good source for help. As for the bullies themselves, it's gone from namecalling to beatings with physical objects or actual weapons.
So I suppose this leads me to my questions:
*How has bullying gotten more savage? What aspects are new to this age-old factor?
*Why is it harder for victims to stand up for themselves to the point where they cause serious damage or end their lives? Or for that matter, why is it harder to go to parents/teachers? What has broken down in that aspect, in regards to communication?
Granted some of these I can guess the answer to, but I'd like to open up discussion.
That said...discuss!
This is all fine and well, but it does leave me confused on some things. Namely, why the bullying outcry NOW? And where is society breaking down?
The reasons I ask this are simple. Nearly every kid gets bullied at some point. It's been the status quo of the schoolyard jungle since forever. Though I was lucky as far as bullying went, I still had a period from grades 7 - 8 where I was tossed by my mother from public school into a Catholic School. Going from an establishment where freedom of expression was acceptable, and everyone knew and liked me to one where no one knew who I was and the student body was strictly groomed to think certain ways and accept certain things wasn't the best transition, nor was it a well thought out idea on my mother's part. As a result, I wound up harassed quite a bit during school hours. How did I deal with it? Simple. I had friends at the nearby public schools, I had friends outside of school. I had things to do to keep me occupied at home, and was able to put it out of my mind after school hours.
Was I a rare case? No. In my neighbourhood, we had ALL been picked on at some point. And at some point we had been the ones doing the picking. Yes, if it went too far, adults would intervene, but there was never a one of us that wound up irreparably scarred or felt suicidal. It's just childhood. It's an unpleasant part of childhood, and it's no secret that children can be cruel little savages, but there it is.
But now in the 21st Century, things have apparently gotten much more savage. Bullying is now thought of as a crime. Victims are finding it harder to stand up for themselves, and parents and teachers aren't a good source for help. As for the bullies themselves, it's gone from namecalling to beatings with physical objects or actual weapons.
So I suppose this leads me to my questions:
*How has bullying gotten more savage? What aspects are new to this age-old factor?
*Why is it harder for victims to stand up for themselves to the point where they cause serious damage or end their lives? Or for that matter, why is it harder to go to parents/teachers? What has broken down in that aspect, in regards to communication?
Granted some of these I can guess the answer to, but I'd like to open up discussion.
That said...discuss!
FA+

*Are* there students who have the guts to stand up and/or fight back, and the Media is mum on the subject? I do notice a strong tendency in the Media to draw attention to people (not just students) who are basically "victimized", or perhaps to portray them as such. :\
Is it harder for victims to stand up for themselves? There is greater help than ever for them. The "It Gets Better" campaign for victims of homophobia. Hotlines, helplines, websites, online communication. A stricter intolerance of bullying among parents and teachers. Communication is still difficult, because bullying is so harmful that many victims are still not getting the help they need.
I am sorry you were a victim of bullying, and while I may have offered a rebuttal of many of your claims, I am in absolute agreement that much more needs to be done to stop bullying and aid victims.
This is why kids have felt so lost and powerless. Not only is the internet giving new, more powerful weapons to aggresors, but the very ones who used to be able to put a stop to it -- specifically, teachers and parents -- have lost all their authority over the bullies. When the danger zone spreads well beyond the playground, they are oftentimes completely clueless how to stop it, or even completely ignorant to its potential use as an attack platform.
I think this is why bullying is being taken much more seriously now; simply because, with modern technology, it has the potential to actually BE much more serious. It's no longer limited to namecalling during recess or stealing lunch money. When you have someone's profile being bombarded by hundreds of hate messages from complete strangers, or having their emotions torn by an online "friend" who is secretly a bully behind an alias, the wounds cut MUCH deeper.
In addition, the St Brigid's kids really could be vicious, conniving things when they wanted to be, and in some ways, I found that more unsettling than if it had been physical abuse. God only knows what that could have turned into, had these little monsters had access to cell phones or Facebook.
Also how these youngsters get to the point of snapping or committing suicide has to do with the length of time that they are bullied, Most are bullied for years and nothing is ever done due to parents and teachers not doing anything when the problem is brought to their attention. Some people will be able to just let the bullying go and shrug it off, others though have trouble doing that and it can cause severe mental and psychologial damage.
Case in point, i was picked on and bullied for years, from 5th grade through junior year at High School. Had very few friends and teachers didnt seem to care, it all finally came to a head 1 day and i snapped at a fellow student who was picking on me telling him if he really wanted to fight that badly he could meet me at the bike racks after school as thats the way i left to go home. All i remember of the fight is him taking the first swing after his friends instigated it, then just seeing him rolling on the ground clutching at his leg screaming while i was restrained by 2 teachers. Come to find out later that i had somehow gotten him on the ground and slid his leg under part of the bike rack and then jumped on it. Needless to say no one bothered me after that day, but it does show that over time bullying can have rather bad consequences if teachers and parents dont take action to prevent it from happening.
...Was quite a shock, to be honest.. at least they matured...
Why don't more parents have that kind of network going when their kids have a problem like that?
If I was able to go back, I think I would have been a lot more proactive (not to mention violent, ahem), but then again, I was much too afraid of the authority both the teachers and my own parents wielded over me. I kinda think that's why I'm rather suspicious and distrusting of anyone in authority now. Well, in real life anyway. My fantasy life sure got a whole lot more interesting, because I spent so much time dwelling on it, haha. Even all the stuff I share here is just a little bit of that; the more "fucked up" and kinky stuff anyway. ^_^
So I'm going on record as saying that just because it's "always been this way" doesn't make it right. That's pretty close to appealing to tradition. And there have always been kids with this kind of problem. It's only now that they have the kind of networked social tools at their disposal that it's finally getting the kind of attention it's always deserved, only never got before because it was so easy to dismiss. I would most definitely call this progress.
Even in my family, I sometimes get picked on and made fun of, and it still irks me a little to this day. It's probably best not to think about it, but I really can't help with who I am. Maybe I just have to deal with it. I dunno.
I developed anxiety at that age to the point of ulcerative colitis, and 4 other stomach disorders. Not to mention daily panic and anxiety attacks. By the age of 17, I had to have 3 colonoscopies and 4 endoscopies to find out why I was constantly doubled over in pain. It was the stress from the physical abuse on top of the verbal abuse I received daily. If it was JUST verbal abuse, I think I could have learned to deal with it. But when physical abuse is put in, and nothing is being done, it's something I COULD NOT handle.
Bullying THEN should have been acted upon. And I regret that it wasn't, because I have a lot of stress issues that have resulted from the trauma I had. And bullying should be acted upon if it's at that level. It's a really touchy subject, but at the same time where there are minor, verbal bullying happening, the parents should teach the kids to stand up for themselves. When it came to the verbal bullying, my mother went to solve all of my issues since she worked at the grade school I attended. And it stunted my ability to be able to stand up for myself and fight my own battles. But I do really wish someone would have stood up for me when the physical abuse happened.
Now another example is my 13 year old cousin. She recently had an incident she shared with me where her friend read a letter she passed to someone who wasn't supposed to see it. They considered THAT (for some reason I can't even imagine) bullying and had a whole counseling session and crap. It boggles me because the whole situation was immature bull crap they should have learned to deal with on their own. But they had the school involved, they probably missed class for it, and it was just a waste of time, imo. X-x;
Yeah, it seems to me that a lot of people don't know where bullying begins and where it's gone too far, so they get a little ass backwards in regards to when action needs to be taken and what to do.
I think the teachers should be more aware of the social aspects of the classroom. They just 100% focus it seems on the academics and they don't understand that children are growing socially as well and that they have little intricate webs between each other and history with each other. And the fact that children that age are growing and learning socially as well as academically and especially when puberty hits in middle school, it's hell for the people being bullied. \:
I actually told my cousin that her whole situation really doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things and she doesn't know what real problems are. I hope she realizes what real issues are and gets over her petty crap because this is feeding the school to believe the problems are caused by problems like hers.
When I finally went to a local community college, I had to start all over again at basic math. (I pretty much started over again with basic everything.) But I found that I loved the environment there so much, that I managed to work my way up to third semester calculus.
So maybe grade school wasn't a waste of time for you. It certainly was for me.
That said, I think many kids make the same mistake I made regarding education. They need to realize that their school is not the epitome of education, and that learning things is never, ever a liability (especially learning from your own mistakes).
--Rick
there is a need for people who are trained for trade. we need welders and such.
besides, get the kids who aren't college bound out of the regular classes, to keep those classrooms not so packed.
Think about it - no Facebook for these victims to perform on and the likelihood of suicide is severely diminished because they no longer get to make a statement to the world with their actions. No 24/7 news channels desperate for stories means that the death (should it even happen) is simply a local tragedy the rest of the country never hears a peep about.
Some of bullies are getting more violent, but that's simply due to the increase in single, welfare mothers producing these children - children raised in a borderline "Lord of the Flies" environment lack the morals and empathy to calm down when they've about to go too far.
Finally, going back to the internet, bullies now have the ability to strike victims anywhere in the world, thus allowing a bully to attack scores more victims then he previously could. Not only can bullying be done from a distance but it can also be done on a national level via sites like ED for instance - it's bad enough for a kid to be name called on a school or neighborhood level but imagine how an emotionally weak individual would react to being name called by the entire internet?
40 years ago the parents were more involved with their kids education, and taught their children discipline and manners before they ever went to class.
Now the prevailing attitude is "You're accusing my child of something? HOW DARE YOU HARASS MY LITTLE ANGEL!" or at best apathy towards their kids (mis)behavior.
Parents are expecting TV and the schools to do the child-rearing that used to be done at home, in essence, trusting the government to raise their kids. (Well, Catholic schools will instill a sense of discipline and conformity, but only in the realm of training the kids to blindly obey authority figures) Trusting the government to rais kids is foolish, the only thing governments can raise are armies and taxes.
And here we have the perfect example of CS's rampant racism and stereotyping he displays in his personal posts. To hear him talk makes one think that if you get rid of welfare, you'll get rid of bullies. Ain't gonna happen, CS, because the bullies I've always had to contend with came from white, middle-class FAMILIES (that's mother AND father) in comfortable suburban settings, not "welfare mothers" in the ghetto.
In the 1950's and continuing through the 80's, John Calhoun, an American ecologist and research psychologist, carried out a number of research studies on population density and its effects on rodent behavior. His most well-known experiment was the "Mouse Universe," a utopian mouse environment where everything was provided except one thing: the amount of space the mice lived in was fixed.
When the mice were introduced to their new home, things progressed swimmingly -- for a while. The population doubled about every 2 months, until almost the end of the first year. Then something interesting started happening around the 10th month: the population started to decline. There was no shortage of food, water, or nesting materials. There were no predators. Yet the population started to fall. In addition, aberrant behavior was started to be noted in the interactions between the mice: Expulsion of the young before weaning was complete, wounding of young, inability of dominant males to maintain the defense of their territory and females, aggressive behavior of females, passivity of non-dominant males with increased attacks on each other which were not defended against were just some of the problems cited. After 20 months, the population drop continued towards extinction of the colony: many of the females stopped giving birth. Those that did become pregnant exhibited a larger number of spontaneous abortions. Some withdrew from the society, never engaging in courtship or fighting. They ate, drank, slept, and groomed themselves – all solitary pursuits.
There were many who scoffed at Calhoun's conclusions: that when all available space is taken and all social roles filled, competition and the stresses experienced by the individuals results in a total breakdown in complex social behaviors, ultimately resulting in the demise of the population. The critics proclaimed, "Yeah, but they're mice! They're not humans with a brain that thinks." The problem is that a thinking brain can be more confining than any limited amount of space. If you go back and observe the rise and fall of those civilizations that weren't affected by invading hoards, the similarity in the pattern is unmistakeable. The civilizations continue to grow and expand until they reach the limits of their growth, whether physical or mental, and then start breaking down until there are remnants, if anything, left. The greatest example of this effect is the Roman Empire, which was already in decline when neighboring conquerors took it out the rest of the way. To a lesser extent, the British Empire also exhibited this pattern with its colonies covering the world that slowly broke away or were released intentionally when it was no longer viable to maintain them. And, I'm sorry to say, the United States is displaying this pattern today: increased aggressive behavior (bullying, rising crime), lack of defense against the rising aggression or an attempt to isolate against the perceived threat like immigration legislation or erecting border walls, the withdrawing away from social situations through other activities like video gaming -- or using the video games and other factors like social media (cell phones, texting) to create an insular barrier between the person and others.
Are we mice? No, but we are animals, with millions of years of evolution behind us, just like the mice. We're not so different than some might think.
Nice denial of reality.
In earlier times it was the entire community that enforced those mores, customs, and laws. Towns were smaller, people more intimate in knowing their neighbors. As population grew, people became more solitary. Today's society is more insular, taking on attitudes such as "It's not my job to raise your kid." They've taken on the role of Calhoun's "Beautiful ones" that isolated themselves from others. You claim that study doesn't apply because humans occupy so little of the available living space. The truth is, for a thinking brain, "living space" isn't confined to physical reality, but what the brain perceives as its reality. If that brain feels confined, or trapped, it reacts as if it is indeed confined or trapped whether that's the reality of the situation or not.
And here we have the perfect example of Akea lying as usual, seeing as there's zero mention of race in my post.
The mouse example is also a terrible example - Americans only live on about 5% of our land, meaning there's plenty of room for us to grow.
Additionally, if space was a consideration then European and Japanese schools should be literal death traps as the average European has about half the living space of an American while Japanese have even less.
It's real simple kid - if a child grows up without having been taught empathy for others and only caring for itself then it will have no empathy for others and no consideration for them.
In a two parent home a child has a better chance of not ending up like that - there will be exceptions of course, but all the studies have proven - eliminate race and only look at single motherhood and you see that crime and poverty rates are the same. These are also the kids who are most prone to such behavior because they did not receive the needed attention and guidance growing up.
However, I do agree with you about guidance. (Oh the horrors! CS and I agree on something!) But, I'll give some single parent families better marks in that area than those with two parents. and some gay and lesbian couple families exceed heterosexual pairings.
But since we're looking at it from Rudolph's viewpoint, I would say just the opposite in fact. It shows how hurtful bullying can be...and how the person being bullied can rise above the others who have nothing better to do.
We had this talking locker in the school and one night I had enough. i wrote this 3 page thing that this kind along with his group did to me. Two days later suspend and never returned. I was quite happy about that and I had no problem ever since.
Last thing in about 2002 to 2003 as my grandpa died a few days before Christmas. I was bulled online and off pretty much everywhere I went due to this one thing everyone I know thought i did. I went into this dark place where I thought went to places to end it all and be free from it all. This even happened when i went to check something the day of the funeral. i basically told everyone to go to hell and then vanished from online along with going out anywhere. Stayed around the house for six months and didn't talk to hardly anyone
"...and use the 'OFF' button."
But, I also only see it as needed for someone that doesn't realize the MUTE / IGNORE option is available.... like kids.
My nemesis was a boy four years older than me who was in my grade. He punched me in the face a few times, knocked me over the edge when I was sitting on my porch, smashed our family's windows, punched my sisters, and basically added a random chance of misery every time I left my house until senior high school. Nobody heard anything about it except my parents, because kids had no public outlet for expressing themselves back then.
Today, I can only imagine the effective tools that bullies have in the form of the internet and mobile phones. Words that once truly vanished after a short time are now indelible as Google indexes them. Sites dedicated primarily to trolling encourage even the most respected people to act like jerks. I'm pretty sure that I would not have survived childhood had I had internet access.
As for making it harder for the bullied to stand up for themselves, if parents and teachers ever suggest to the kid (usually via their actions or lack of action) that they can't be relied on to stop any of the crap, kids are just not going to trust them, and may never have any confidence in them. With some kids, this is a very bad development because with those kids, once the trust is gone, it's gone for good.
On the internet, perhaps the only effective way to "stand up for yourself" is to simply not participate. Cyber-asses can't *force* you to type reactions into your keyboard. Unfortunately, "not giving a shit" is a rather under-taught skill, and the bullied feel they need to do something...
At least technology has an "off" switch. All the "off" switches in the world aren't going to make someone who's been bullied more accepted by others, but it helps. Just try "turning off" a happy slap, or a kick to the head...
It also brings to mind something else that I didn't really think of. When we were kids, and someone was picking on us, it was easy to point the kid out and have the necessary action taken place. But in cyberspace, where do you begin? When you have bullies breeding like roaches, all to attack someone, it's hard to single them out, especially when more people and aliases and forums get involved. This gets even stickier if the victim says something to defend themselves but it winds up being used against them.
Yeah off switches do help and when I was newer to the net in like, 1995, it was easy for me to walk away from the computer and go outside if a chat room or message board thread got too heated.
But now, with technology as vital as it is, it's much harder to just turn things off like cell phones.
That being said, cripes. I'm glad I got my childhood out of the way when I did. o.o
"Not listening to them" works wonders for me, which is good, because I'm overweight, can't run anywhere near fast, and couldn't land a punch on thin air. Also I (unfortunately) have a huge aversion towards exercise since PE class.
Though, I do see that bullying has gotten more cruel now in days. From the usual schoolyard bullying and teasing to pretty much trolling on the internet. There are now many crueler ways to bully people that not even going online is safe anymore. And I think the parents and teachers don't help when the victums needed is because they are afraid of the bully's parents. Afraid they might defend them. Saying their kid is not a bully, how dare they accuse their child of being one, and they will sue. That kind of stuff. We're now in a time when kids fend for themselves and the adults can't touch them period to help.
I also got picked on for being a "nerd" as me and friends would play yu-gi-oh or talk furry in the cafeteria at lunch time
Today, however, when those in authority catch you in a fight, both sides are punished. Equally. Why? Because they don't want to get into deciding who was at fault. They don't want angry parents coming in telling off the school administration of how their "Wee Precious Little Child would never bully someone, and why wasn't the other child suspended? He was fighting too, wasn't he?"
So, the bully learns that as long as he isn't caught, he gets away with it, and if someone confronts him, bring in the authorities and you break even. It's a win-win for him, and a lose-lose for anyone stopping him.
That said, the biggest anti-bullying claim is that bullying leads to suicide. Bullshit. Those who actually deal with suicidal teens know that bullying is only one factor, and it is a minor factor. Personality is the biggest factor, parents are secondary. Bullying doesn't even rank third.
But what really annoys me about the anti-bullying campaign is all they do is TALK about how bad it is, as if talking about it was the solution. The unspoken desire of these organizers is that if they complain about it enough, someone ELSE will come up with a solution they themselves are unwilling to discover.
And it isn't limited to the anti-bullying campaign. Just about every campaign that has "Awareness" in it's title is basically a bunch of whiners who want someone ELSE to come up with a solution, while they simply accumulate money to do more whining about it.
Speaking as someone who _did_ come within a hair's breadth of killing himself a couple of times: BULLSHIT!
It bloody well does lead to suicides and it is a major factor.
To make the claim that bullying is not a major factor, you have to do things like control for depression. Note how that is like saying the car didn't crash because it was pushed over the hill, but because it rolled down the hill.
Teensuicidestatistics.com
Oh, you didn't cite a source, did you?
Hindujaa & Patchin 2010, Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide, Archives of Suicide Research
Klomek et.al. 2007, Bullying, Depression, and Suicidality in Adolescents, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Klomek et.al. 2008, Childhood Bullying Behaviors as a Risk for Suicide Attempts and Completed Suicides: A Population-Based Birth Cohort Study, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Kim & Leventhal, 2008, Bullying and suicide. A review, International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health
Your response also shows that you didn't even bother looking up the abstracts.
Even if it means you have to make wild-ass, (and incorrect), guesses based on nothing more than a title.
BIOLOGICALLY speaking, I think bullying is two different things. It is a natural process seen in all flock animals which decides where on the ladder an individual will be later in life as physical and mental skills are developed and tested during childhood play and seriousness. It is also a bad thing where several weak individuals find strength in numbers and gang up on a strong individual, which can destroy an otherwise good condition specimen.
SOCIALLY speaking, we as humans are not just animals but more than that. We're sophisticated and have languages and music and know what abstract concepts such as salesmanship and democracy are. Therefore we must also evolve above the animal level in the bullying sense and try to get rid of it. There is no doubt in my mind that people who were not bullied significantly in their childhood feel more confident later in life to flourish into what they want to be.
CULTURALLY speaking, I think I got an answer to your "why now?" question. We humans have evolved into more and more sensitive and kind people. Yes we are still Barbaric in many ways, we're selfish and war, rape, murder and persecution are daily phenomena still. But we're changing. Once it was accepted that everyone who wasn't part of our own group were Barbarians to be slayed. Later it was accepted that those who did not share our culture and faith had to be force-converted and changed so they were like us. Once slavery was accepted as normal. Once women were seen as inferior. Remnants of all this still remain, but it HAS gotten better.
So the answer to your question is: As we have grown more compassionate, tolerant and kind to each other in general, bullying in general seem less and less acceptable. At the same time bullying has gotten more and more serious. No longer are we talking kids stealing each other's shoes or pushing each other down in the dirt after school, we are talking cutting and bone breaking and guns and death. And it has gotten more invasive too; it is no longer confined to school. With social media and mobile phones there is no break from it, you can get text messages at all hours of the day and night. You never get a break not for one hour if they are persistent enough.
TL;DR
Bullying is biologically natural but socially we must rise above it. Culturally we are growing less tolerant of it, it seems more unacceptable now and at the same time it's more invasive.
That was my answer as an anthropologist.
With technology coming into play as much as it is however, it gives it a nastier edge.
I mentioned how conniving the little shits at St. Brigid's were. However, once I left that school and moved to the States, that book was closed. However, had the internet been involved, I don't think they would have let that book close that easily...nor would I have been able to resituate myself at a new school as successfully as I had.
Yes and isn't that a shame that kids are robbed of that break today? This is the backside to the communication society, too much communication. Just like there is such a thing as too much information. Everything with modesty. Just out of curiousity, where did you live before the States?
I sent my daughter to the same school in the 2000s. Absolutely no physical contact was permitted, so the kids were really, really mean to each other, and sometimes the parents would egg the kids on.Its as if the weaker kids were scabs and everyone had to poke at them until they bled.
to sum it up in a single axiome: "we, KIds,are the New Trolls on the Block,World is screwin up, and we wanna help it getting DESTROYED as fast and as quick as possible cos its just what Humanity deserves so far"
that of course, givin from granted the rule of Private Property Humanhood applied since a dozen thousands years to today,but thats another story.... (i will extend this discourse if you would like to reply to my comment of ocurse, i dont like Amtrak-lenght-wise comments anymore that much ,yknow)
(oh and sorry if i misused the name of the Boy Band you SURELY would like not to be used that mercilessly)
that said, i know my view sounded radical and not very pleasant, but its just what i experienced ,bearing in mind thsi is MY own opinion
Kids can be like cruel vultures - they seem to get a high whenever acts of violence occur in the school grounds.
I blame the decrease of discipline over the years and technology like internet.
Personally, I think it's a mish-mash of many things these days. How it seems/feels like parents can't properly disapline kids for fear that they'll be called child abusers. Teachers either won't interfere, or they'll get told by parents/guardians to bud out and mind their own business, or they just won't care (like in many of the cases in my elementary/jr. high schools). And, as one mentioned above, the internet can play a HUGE part in bullying now-a-days. There was no such thing as the internet when I was growing up (only my brother's Commador Vic 20! LOL!) and with all the social networks out there, it's so much easier for bullies to find allies to help with the bullying (sometimes the cyber bullies haven't even met or even know the person they're bullying...doesn't matter, just as long as they get their bullying on, it's all good to them), or sometimes bullies will just take on alias/anonymous names just to make it appear that there's more people ganging up on the victim, it's so easy to do that. And unless you're a computer whiz (which I'm not) and can find out if all the bullying is coming from one house's IP address, it's hard to really know if it's just one person kicking all the crap around, or if it really is their cronies from other places ganging up on you. Bruises and other phyiscal wounds can heal over time. But words...they can stick with you for life. Some people aren't emotionally strong enough to defeat those words, and unfortunately, in the end, those words get the best of them. They almost got the best of me.
My mom was telling me about something that happened in Ottawa - a girl saw her friend being bullied, so she stepped in to stop it. The bully started bullying that girl, and then started making death threats, saying she was going to bring a knife to school and kill her. Or saying she was going to tie up the girl and get the girl watch as the bully kills her mother, and then she'll kill the girl afterwards. That, in itself, is a HUGE WTF for me because this little bully is only 9 years old O.o; What in the world can possess a 9 year old to not only have those thoughts, but to even go as far as actually bringing a knife to school (they found it in her backpack) to almost carry out the deed? O.o I dunno about anyone else, but when I was 9, I was wondering what kind of My Little Pony I would get for Christmas, or worrying about getting my homework done, or whatever. I dunno. We *never* heard about that kind of stuff when I was a kid.
About a month ago, I was in a plasma center, waiting to be screened to donate plasma, when a guy randomly started gay bashing me. He called me names, threatened to beat me up everyday, threatened to kill me, made fun of me for hours.
All because of the way my hair looked.
Mind you, I've been out of school for a very long time. I'm 25, and he looked to be around 25-30.
Sexual discrimination.
It happens too often, but not just in schools.
At this point, we move away from teachers and parents, to armed security guards and surrounding people.
But just like in school, they were no help. It was a crowd of about 50-75 people, and many of them laughed and egged him on. If a fight broke out, they would have just put it on YouTube, or jumped in for some fun. The security guard actually walked right by and did nothing. Senile as all hell.
And had he actually threw a punch, and I did fight back, somehow I'd be the one in the wrong, because people keep regarding me as some kind of serial killer and assassin. I "look" wrong, so I must be wrong.
Guess it gets better much later in life, huh?
Aside from that, I think bullies need a goood taste of their own doing, see if they like it. Not to mention I also think bullies do what they do, cause parents tend to encourage that kind of inexcusable behaviour and what not.
First, as has been mentioned, not being at school is no longer a sanctuary . Your choice is often between the abuse and near-total social isolation[1].
More important, however, are a couple of reporting effects.
There is the general bit where you hear about a larger portion of tragic events over a larger area. A few decades ago you wouldn't hear about an event in the next city that you now hear about from the other side of the country.
Most important is the simple fact that people are finally admitting that these things happen. We actually say the kid committed suicide and it was due to bullying, we don't say things like 'he had an accident' or go scraping around to find something 'weird' about the kid to blame, (he played D&D, he read comics, he listened to rock&roll, etc.).
What's the solution? It's not complicated, it's just too much work for many teachers/school administrations/etc.: Pay attention to what's going on, respond to the bullying without needing students reporting it, don't punish the victims.
[1] Saying "just don't go on Facebook" doesn't help when Facebook is the way every social event is organized and how all the invitations are sent out.