So! *Question for you all*
14 years ago
General
If you learned that you hurted someone for the rest of there life as you dint knew you would hurt them at the beginning...
How could you redemp yourself even knowing that all you will say or do wont change the situation?
Had and interesting day today and wanted to know some of you guys opinions on it.
Thanks in advance =)
How could you redemp yourself even knowing that all you will say or do wont change the situation?
Had and interesting day today and wanted to know some of you guys opinions on it.
Thanks in advance =)
FA+

Thanks for your reply Ekans *smiles*
As for general hurting and the like it's pretty much the same answer it's hard to convince someone to do anything when they think they are right and near impossible when they actually are. I've seen some nasty drama happen in the fandom the past few years involving a bunch of different people some of whom are quite close to me some of which was forgiven after a while and other grudges run too deep to heal properly. It all depends on the person both who was wronged and the person who wronged them on whether forgiveness is an option and even then sometimes the only cure is time.
Me myself I try to look on the other side of things and usually after hearing someones side I can forgive them but even then there are some things that I wouldn't be able to right away or maybe even after time has passed who knows.
Best of luck Zets. No one is perfect.
♦ Actions speak louder than words.
♦ Be honest.
♦ Maintaining a dialogue is important. (ie. *Both* being able to talk with the other.)
♦ How you say something is just as if not sometimes more important than what you say.
♦ Expecting someone to be perfect all the time is naive. People do sometimes make mistakes....but that's no reason to give up.
♦ What's important is learning from mistakes so you don't repeat them is important.
♦ "Time heals all wounds." Maybe it will; maybe it wont. Certainly nothing will happen without effort. Just try to be the best person you can be and try and learn from your mistakes. Taking time to think about things can give you new perspectives and can help smooth over some of the emotions even if they may never fade completely. Really depends on the circumstances and the people involved.
♦ Is moving on the right thing? It'd say only if the other person doesn't want to see or talk to you. If two people care about each other, then they'll always try to find ways to make things work in some way or another. But remember it takes two to tango: if one person puts in effort but the other one doesn't, then after a while one of them might start to question where the other person really stands and decide it's truly time to move on.
♦ People are simple but also complicated. Sometimes over-thinking is your worse enemy. Remember, as much as you know a person, you're not in their head. So, there's always room for benefit of doubt.
♦ All rules have exceptions; even this one.
In short; each person has to decide for themselves how they will respond. I'm not sure there are any totally right answers here. Just do what you think is the right thing. I'd at least try to talk to the other person. If they are angry or don't want to talk to you right now, maybe wait a while and try one last time?
Best of luck!
But nothing ventured nothing gained.
We shouldn't start thinking of people as disposable just because there are so many of them in the world.
If a person really should be left alone for good, it depends on the circumstances and the person involved.
If tensions are high I might wait awhile to let the other person cool down and think things over....but I'd at least try to fix things rather than give up and not try at all.
Unless there's solid good reasons to leave someone alone I think it's harsh to paint them as black and white because few things in this world are that extreme.
Mistakes happen and misunderstandings happen; that's part of life. What would happen if everyone just gave up each time something bad happened?!
I'd say treat people as you'd like to be treated. Wouldn't you like your friend (or whoever it is) to be as forgiving and to try to be as understanding?
Anyway, if you don't want to give up even when things really are hopeless, probably the best way would be to let this person know you want to be forgiven and are willing to do whatever is necessary to earn his forgiveness, (within reason -- for instance, no killing yourself), then leave him (her?) alone and let him decide if and when. After all, it's your friend's decision, not yours.
Edwin Markham once said...
“He drew a circle that shut me out-
Heretic , rebel, a thing to flout.
But love and I had the wit to win:
We drew a circle and took him In !"
OTOH, W.C. Fields once said, "If a first you don't succeed, try again. Then quit. No use being a fool about it."
Let's call this hypothetical person who was hurt "Jack", and lets name the other person "Mark".
What I did say was that for Mark to believe that Jack believes "that nothing Mark could do would ever make things right" may be far easier and more tempting than to face the possibility that there is something Mark can do to make things better. It's this "I (Mark) did nothing wrong and it's the all the other person's (Jack's) fault" kind of mentally that I don't agree with. If Mark believes that Jack is being stubborn and that Jack can't seem to see reason and on that basis Mark then chooses to do nothing instead of trying, then how is Mark any less guilty of behaving how he thinks Jack is? And the keyword here is "thinks"! Because Mark might very well be wrong with his *guess* about what Jack thinks! Unfortunately, in this scenario, Mark has already "pre-judged" Jack and characterized him as hopeless because "nothing can be done" and so arrived at the *erroneous* conclusion that the best thing to is to leave things alone and part ways.
It's more likely that both people are at fault to some degree and that the problem is the result of communication gone terribly wrong and actions misinterpreted resulting in a big misunderstanding that leaves one or both people hurt. It might also be because of some kind of incompatible clash of ideologies.
Point is, I think a lot of people prefer the convent route of saying that things are hopeless because then they are off the hook rather than admit that there might actually be something they can do.
Now, I'm not saying there aren't situations when it's better to leave things alone and part ways. However, unless your are absolutely sure you are doing the right thing then I would heavily resist going that route. Even then, I would probably be open to my friend (or x-friend) if they wanted to try and make things right in the future. But if I thought that everything I did just seemed to make things worse for both people and I had tried everything I could think and tried for a very long time without success, only then might I conclude that the most sensible course of action would be to part ways.
Also, it depends on other factors to like how close you were with this person to begin with. I would be willing to invest more effort into someone I had been friends with and valued for years than for someone who I might have met a say a month ago.
If I emotionally hurt someone in a life-changing way, I would again offer my very deepest apology, if they were willing to hear me out. At that point they could accept my apology or reject it. If they refuse to listen to my apology and want no contact with me, at that point it would be best if I stayed out of that person's life permanently. To keep trying to pry my way in to make amends when it's unwanted would only make things worse.