Furries vs Anthros
13 years ago
General
You have entered Da Blitz Arena... :D .....a pointless fuss, argument, and fight. IMO yes, but the truth as well.
Earlier today I found a submission(now deleted) about the differences between Furry and Anthro body types. Normally, this is like 'whatever' to anyone or 'cool, i didn't know that. Thanks. :)' but the said reason the poster submitted the pic...is to prove the point that their(no name to be given) art/creations are solely Anthro, not Furry.
Now, to test their claim, I dug through their gallery, scraps too. What I found was what I thought. All types of art, primarily, BOTH Furry and Anthro art. This person was(likely still is) is raising the argument of this when they oblivious art on both 'sides of this spectrum. Why bring this up if you art both? Why deny what you draw? WHY waste your time even making this an argument? It is a pointless waste of your time, everyone who comment's time, even the people(like me) just passing by's time when you clear do both.
My only possible reasoning to even try to validate the point of this would be the argument(question really) that is "Are you Furry or Not?" which, many people, DO NOT wish and blatantly REFUSE to even to be considered a furry 'cause they don't accept them nor/or are afraid(IMO on the afraid part) and some people think what they draw is what they are(which is complete bullshit. I draw Pokemon, Anthros, Furries, Chibis, etc. Am I a chimera of all these things put together? HELL NO!! I am me! That's it.). Similar to this, people are scared to be considered gay/lesbian. People deny themselves 'cause they are afraid of what comes with it.
That's my take on the pointless argument and I close with this:
Earlier today I found a submission(now deleted) about the differences between Furry and Anthro body types. Normally, this is like 'whatever' to anyone or 'cool, i didn't know that. Thanks. :)' but the said reason the poster submitted the pic...is to prove the point that their(no name to be given) art/creations are solely Anthro, not Furry.
Now, to test their claim, I dug through their gallery, scraps too. What I found was what I thought. All types of art, primarily, BOTH Furry and Anthro art. This person was(likely still is) is raising the argument of this when they oblivious art on both 'sides of this spectrum. Why bring this up if you art both? Why deny what you draw? WHY waste your time even making this an argument? It is a pointless waste of your time, everyone who comment's time, even the people(like me) just passing by's time when you clear do both.
My only possible reasoning to even try to validate the point of this would be the argument(question really) that is "Are you Furry or Not?" which, many people, DO NOT wish and blatantly REFUSE to even to be considered a furry 'cause they don't accept them nor/or are afraid(IMO on the afraid part) and some people think what they draw is what they are(which is complete bullshit. I draw Pokemon, Anthros, Furries, Chibis, etc. Am I a chimera of all these things put together? HELL NO!! I am me! That's it.). Similar to this, people are scared to be considered gay/lesbian. People deny themselves 'cause they are afraid of what comes with it.
That's my take on the pointless argument and I close with this:
All Furries are Anthros. All Anthros are Furries. Why is this? Because, at the core of both types of art(which they are, TYPES of Art), they BOTH have a bit of HUMAN to them. No matter you try to deny, no matter what you say, no matter how many changes to the art you make to make it look different: IT. IS. ALL. THE. FUCKING. SAME! GET. OVER. IT!
I Thank You for your time.~Blitzy
FA+

But in all seriousness, with your reasoning given, they would both be considered human, no?
The way you said it is like "All penguins are birds, therefor, all birds are penguins."
Which can be GREATLY misleading into another form of context that I wish not to explain in my
Benefit of the doubt. Either way, No matter what, theyre going to be considered Furries whether they like it
or not, and vice versa.