Art Idea: Peace Thru Yiffing
17 years ago
I was just looking at somebody's Icon, and an idea crossed my mind:
An artistic community or meme or something involving two figures-- each of which represents conflicting groups, e.g., communism/capitalism, Christian/Atheist, Islam/Israel, Republican/Democrat.
Anyhow, the pair should be engaged if yiffy/romantic foreplay.
Opportunities for symbolism in choice of species, choice of near-to-paw kinks, size differences and who appears to be the dominant partner (I'm thinking, majority or locally popular groups as the larger characters, but anxiously submissive to smaller dom partners.)
A good buddy of mine (who I learned much later, was gay), once advised: "If they're going to judge you by who you sleep with, then fuck 'em."
And the underlying concepts:
1) the same thing you can observe everywhere, but especially in school-- two people fighting frivolously often suggests that they're really attracted to each other (I mean, not always, but it can.)
2) Opposites are irresistably seductive
3) A projection onto power politics of the dom/sub observation that people tend in the bedroom to be the opposite of how they act in the public sphere-- powerful CEOs who sub for 'nobodies.'
An artistic community or meme or something involving two figures-- each of which represents conflicting groups, e.g., communism/capitalism, Christian/Atheist, Islam/Israel, Republican/Democrat.
Anyhow, the pair should be engaged if yiffy/romantic foreplay.
Opportunities for symbolism in choice of species, choice of near-to-paw kinks, size differences and who appears to be the dominant partner (I'm thinking, majority or locally popular groups as the larger characters, but anxiously submissive to smaller dom partners.)
A good buddy of mine (who I learned much later, was gay), once advised: "If they're going to judge you by who you sleep with, then fuck 'em."
And the underlying concepts:
1) the same thing you can observe everywhere, but especially in school-- two people fighting frivolously often suggests that they're really attracted to each other (I mean, not always, but it can.)
2) Opposites are irresistably seductive
3) A projection onto power politics of the dom/sub observation that people tend in the bedroom to be the opposite of how they act in the public sphere-- powerful CEOs who sub for 'nobodies.'
"60's what?"
And you know. With excreable bastages like Ron Paul drumming up neo-libertarianism in all its emo anarchistic splendor and selling BS to all those folks that otherwise would be good liberals, it's not like we're past that danger.
Gimme potheads over militants anytime.
No, no anarchy/libertarianism. I'll stick to socialism/communism.
But if you're into just thinking stuff rather than acting and changing things, by all means, stick to the potheads.