Under-fav'd
17 years ago
Recently, the clever and sometime-caffienated
foxytangerine posed the question: who doesn't get enough attention on FA?
Looking at the people I have fav'd, I used maths (Y= MX^N + B, and using three good datapoints to solve for M, N, and B, where X is the number of stars from 1-5 I would give somebody, and Y is the total number of faves they actually have-- for which values I determined M = ~1/72.5, N = ~8.48, and B = ~4.07), and was able to calculate how many times as many faves I think people *should* have, as they actually *do* have.
1.
McKenzie -- regrettably, McKenzie hasn't been active on FA in a couple months, but she's awesome.
2.
chimerabred -- also not active in the last couple months as far as I can tell, but superb.
3.
flye -- I like flye's stuff cuz I have always liked the way she thinks. And nobody is faving her stuffs. Hmh.
4.
Iriecat -- Irecat writes a lot of really great lyrics that nobody ever reads.
5.
Ratiries -- absolutely stunning stuff, and less than 2k faves. Weird.
6.
Michele_Light -- Weird inclusion, I know, but Michele's a friggin opus of superlative arts, but a lot fewer faves than I would have ever expected.
7.
DragoniaKMP --Really great colorful stuff from another person whose thought process I trust.
8.
Kaiven -- ZOMG caliber work, and still under-faved compared with some other equally awesome folks.
9.
SushiCougar -- creative and beautiful stuff, rather under-faved.
10.
Goldenfox -- more super-awesome stuff less faved that it deserves to be.

Looking at the people I have fav'd, I used maths (Y= MX^N + B, and using three good datapoints to solve for M, N, and B, where X is the number of stars from 1-5 I would give somebody, and Y is the total number of faves they actually have-- for which values I determined M = ~1/72.5, N = ~8.48, and B = ~4.07), and was able to calculate how many times as many faves I think people *should* have, as they actually *do* have.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

But yeah, I'll check these people out ^.^