FA+
Shop
Mods deleted some not-quite-art.
12 years ago
Apparently linking to uncensored art from a censored version is against the new AUP. At this point I have no idea if I can link to my other account's front page, if I can post censored art without links, or if even acknowledging the existence of disallowed art is somehow a violation of the AUP. I'm removing links and crossing my fingers until I get some response.
I must say I'm pretty goddamn tired of walking on eggshells over this. It's not enough that mods just delete shit and wag a finger at you - no, they have to send scary form letters about account suspension while reminding you that all rule enforcement is a matter of moderator discretion. In plain english: if you aren't at least as anal about the rules as whichever moderator double-checks your self-censorship, kiss your account goodbye.
You know how InkBunny does it? They mark submissions invisible and briefly explain their rationale. They don't threaten you, and they don't even really delete anything.
So, in broad terms, there's this furry art site called InkBunny, and they host things FurAffinity doesn't allow. My account there may (or may not!) have art of that variety. Go there if you want to see that, or really, if you want to see much of me at all. I might not even post the art they disallow here, since they let people link whatever they please so long as the submission itself is kosher. In the meantime, excuse any art that goes missing here, and if this whole account disappears, it's not by choice.
I must say I'm pretty goddamn tired of walking on eggshells over this. It's not enough that mods just delete shit and wag a finger at you - no, they have to send scary form letters about account suspension while reminding you that all rule enforcement is a matter of moderator discretion. In plain english: if you aren't at least as anal about the rules as whichever moderator double-checks your self-censorship, kiss your account goodbye.
You know how InkBunny does it? They mark submissions invisible and briefly explain their rationale. They don't threaten you, and they don't even really delete anything.
So, in broad terms, there's this furry art site called InkBunny, and they host things FurAffinity doesn't allow. My account there may (or may not!) have art of that variety. Go there if you want to see that, or really, if you want to see much of me at all. I might not even post the art they disallow here, since they let people link whatever they please so long as the submission itself is kosher. In the meantime, excuse any art that goes missing here, and if this whole account disappears, it's not by choice.
Yet another reason for me not to post any of my stuff.
No, I have learned to generally distrust the admins here.
Ask Dragoneer.
It is among the latest in a long list...
When administrators don't know what they are doing, or how to do it, one really wonders...
I don't like having a lot of violations on the site, and I don't like having to deal with the fallout that comes from it.
I'm sorry, but I'm going to call shenanigans on that. I've talked to some of those artists with 2,000 images in their galleries, and some of them have had clear and blatant violations of art involving children performing sexual acts towards adult characters. Blatantly obvious ones. When we ask users to remove the cub porn, they cite "Why ones? Go through all 2,000 submissions and tell me which ones."
It's pretty obvious when they openly draw cub art that they should be aware of when they're artists who specialize in drawing cub art. The "I have no idea what I've drawn" response doesn't fly when they have blatant imagery of kids in sexual situations.
Yes, for those images that are borderline, that's another story.
I understand arguments from personal experience aren't going to sway you, and it is right that they don't by the way. From my side I'm not going to look for a debate with someone that feels the mods on this site are infallible. ESPECIALLY when in the end, this site can be run however the owner or owners want it to be run. For example, if they suddenly decided that they don't want lapins anymore, then it's time for me to close shop and leave. I would have no case against this decision because it is not my website and I do lapin characters.
(double takes your post)
wait, so you agree with me while calling Shenanigans on the same point.... alright. I'll just assume that a rushed post while I was at work was worded too poorly to convey what my point really was clearly enough. Happy New Year. ^_^
(Posted here since for some reason I cannot respond to the person that responded to my post earlier)
I would use Inkbunny, but I hear there are a lot of pedophiles over there.