Brother Bear
17 years ago
General
WOW...nothing stirs up a response on these blogs like a discussion about god. I don't know if that's a good or bad thing. I suppose it's worrying to me because it IS such a hot topic--even to me! I will watch documentaries on the History Channel about biblical subjects like "End Times", or the Anti-Christ, or new perspectives on the life of Jesus... I get freaked out by news articles about Rev. Phelps picketing Aids victims or soldier's funerals.
The hype still gets under my fur!
I guess that's why I am interested in doing this whole on-line ordination business--not just for the irony of the whole thing, but a serious desire to point out the "Emperor-has-no-clothes" aspect of the religious debate. As I have puzzled over this question for 30 years, going from Christianity to Secular Humanist agnosticism bordering on atheism by reading, watching, learning and passionate consideration, I feel I have at LEAST as much to contribute to the issue as an Oral Roberts or a Sarah Palin (the newest ultra-conservative mouthpiece the radical Right would like to force on us.) BTW--she's MY age.
Also, the other reason for my interest in this new direction is that I want to add a spiritual aspect to my art--especially my furry paintings. I want to show my awe and reverence for the beauty of life and the universe. I want to show that you don't HAVE to worship forces that are greater than yourself to APPRECIATE and respect them. There's also the desire to live as ethical a life as I can manage as a mere flawed mortal and show that morality should come from within, not threats (of damnation) from without.
My fundamentalist Christian friend (who I worked on a comic with) tells me I have no "moral center" without Jesus. That I am definitely going to Hell (because I'm gay) if I don't repent and accept Jesus. It doesn't matter to him whether I'm a good person or not...it's all about dogma to him. I think that's wrong, plain and simple. And too many people in this world think his way, or in a manner that is even worse, ie Muslim fundamentalists, Rev. Phelps, etc. They aren't all violent and evil--but their intolerance and narrow-mindedness make it possible for people like that to exist and inflict the kind of terror and pain that they do. to that degree they are culpable.
All because they insist on believing in something without any rational basis AND often believing in the radical dogmatic interpretations of those core beliefs. At the very least--belief in a God should be a comforting thing, not a rallying point for hate. It would be nice if there were NO rallying points for those feelings, but Jesus, Mohamed, and God His-self should ESPECIALLY be exempt from teachings of hate!
The hype still gets under my fur!
I guess that's why I am interested in doing this whole on-line ordination business--not just for the irony of the whole thing, but a serious desire to point out the "Emperor-has-no-clothes" aspect of the religious debate. As I have puzzled over this question for 30 years, going from Christianity to Secular Humanist agnosticism bordering on atheism by reading, watching, learning and passionate consideration, I feel I have at LEAST as much to contribute to the issue as an Oral Roberts or a Sarah Palin (the newest ultra-conservative mouthpiece the radical Right would like to force on us.) BTW--she's MY age.
Also, the other reason for my interest in this new direction is that I want to add a spiritual aspect to my art--especially my furry paintings. I want to show my awe and reverence for the beauty of life and the universe. I want to show that you don't HAVE to worship forces that are greater than yourself to APPRECIATE and respect them. There's also the desire to live as ethical a life as I can manage as a mere flawed mortal and show that morality should come from within, not threats (of damnation) from without.
My fundamentalist Christian friend (who I worked on a comic with) tells me I have no "moral center" without Jesus. That I am definitely going to Hell (because I'm gay) if I don't repent and accept Jesus. It doesn't matter to him whether I'm a good person or not...it's all about dogma to him. I think that's wrong, plain and simple. And too many people in this world think his way, or in a manner that is even worse, ie Muslim fundamentalists, Rev. Phelps, etc. They aren't all violent and evil--but their intolerance and narrow-mindedness make it possible for people like that to exist and inflict the kind of terror and pain that they do. to that degree they are culpable.
All because they insist on believing in something without any rational basis AND often believing in the radical dogmatic interpretations of those core beliefs. At the very least--belief in a God should be a comforting thing, not a rallying point for hate. It would be nice if there were NO rallying points for those feelings, but Jesus, Mohamed, and God His-self should ESPECIALLY be exempt from teachings of hate!
FA+

Or maybe it's just my diet that makes me poop rainbows...
But you are definitely right--people absolutely have the right the think I'm wrong as much as I might think THEY are wrong. And we each have the right to argue our case and say what we feel.
But just because I'm somewhat liberal doesn't mean I can't have specific viewpoints. I will solidly cling to my right to be as ignorant as anyone else. ^0^
In any case--good for you!
Plenty of passages in the christian bible indicate that god wants people to get along, be friendly to one-another, and never *ever* to judge. That's his job. As soon as your friend condemns you to hell (what a nice thing to do, too), he would also condemn himself to hell if he truly believed the teachings of the bible. So, I call out any supposedly religious person trying to use that angle.
seriouspost nobody says anything meaningful in those discussions. the absolute, smug silliness of the theists and the glib, adolescent posturing of the atheists run together like greasy yolk-- aesthetically, substantially, viscerally offensive and meaningless
As far as the spiritual aspect to your art, knock yourself out. I really doubt that all the people doing pictures of Anubis and Set are really recognizing the proper rituals of worship on a daily basis (or even occasionally). I think mythological art is way cool, and it has a fine, long, tradition. Personally, I just lump in all the black velvet crucifixion paintings with the unicorn, zeus and bigfoot paintings.
There are so many religions in this world, with so many adherents to each one, that I find it truly impossible for any of them to be "right". I think you hit it right on the nail about living as ethically a life as you possibly can, and appreciating the beauty of the world we live in without forcing yourself and others into a narrow line of dogma. If it turns out there is a God, I can't imagine anything he would have wanted more than that.
I have to be careful not to become a bigot against religion. Even my Fundamentalist friend is a good guy--smart and personable. I deplore his political and religious stands on certain issues, but otherwise I think he is an extremely admirable person. Even though he believes some of the same things that the really extreme hate-mongers believe, I don't think HE is a bad person.
Also, Obama does not believe that gays should have rights. Palin at least thinks that they should be capable of defending themselves against hate crimes.
It seems that the Democratic party wants to give all women the right to kill fetuses, while Republicans want to preserve the right to defend your home and yourself from violent criminals. Obama is anti-gun rights, always has been, don't let him lie to you. That's why he chose Biden. McCain chose Palin as a counter to that, being that she's extremely pro-gun.
Obama probably doesn't care for homosexuality either--after all, he is also religious. ALL the candidates are. You can't BE a candidate for high office in this country without being religious, or at least giving lip service to God. But at least Obama won't try to change the Constitution to make gay marriage impossible, or stand in front of Congress and blatantly label homosexuals as second class citizens undeserving of government recognition as our current President has done.
McCain/Palin will keep this country in the dark age that we have already "enjoyed" for the past eight years. No thanks.
I understand people wanting to keep their guns and all--but I really don't want to live in the Old West. There needs to be some sort of limit. Look at some of the Middle East countries where conservative religious rule is the norm--children carrying machine guns in the streets...do we really need that?
You say you don't want to live in the old west, but actually, living in the old west wouldn't be so bad. There was very little crime, not because there were no guns, but because everyone had a gun. People were polite to each other, and showed respect where it was due. Pretty much all the movies showing the old west as a constant bloody gun fight are untrue. Before the NFA of 1934, a child could order a Maxim water-cooled machine gun out of the Sears catalog and have it delivered by mail. School shootings weren't a problem back then. Many of the notorious criminals back then were exaggerated in order to sell books about them. With current laws on gun control, someone looking to outdo even the fictitious records of notorious outlaws of the old west could easily walk into a "Gun Free" mall, school, church, or otherwise, and have a good chance at outdoing in only a day what some outlaws of the old west didn't do in their entire life.
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
mostly I don't get an answer after that
Also, please tell your friend to read the Old Testament and get back to you on that "lack of moral center".
The point is--it was written by people who were almost entirely ignorant of how things in this universe actually work. They didn't know what the stars were. They didn't know why the forces of nature function predictably--or in some cases unpredictably (eclipses, etc). I'm not implying that they were stupid or evil or psycho or even foolish--they were simply ignorant. Period.
We are somewhat less ignorant today as a society. We have a long way to go. I believe there's much more to be discovered about the universe. He believes there's NOTHING more that needs to be learned about the universe. I will never change his views--and he will never change mine.
but really, i agree on ur thoughts whole heartedly, we should chat IM some time ;3
Just as an example: My mom insists on watching the news every night. I think she enjoys being miserable. O.o Anyways, one night they were covering a story about how Orville Redinbacher had died and that in his Will he wanted his ashes scattered over a corn field.
First thing that popped out of my muzzle: "Well, that's one way to dust your crops."
My mother wanted to kill me for that one. **laughs**
People who get their morals from a 2000 year old unchangeable work of fiction (which can be mail ordered from Amazon.com) scare me, especially when they start proclaiming that this is better than getting one's morals from being a normal sane person raised in a civil society (like we actually do).
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com
One look into that book makes it abundantly clear that few, if any people in modern America derive their moral center from it.
Again, I don't have a problem with people believing in this 6-2000 YO work of literature and mythology. It's only when they think they have the right to inflict it on me--against my own judgment and will--and force me to live by the dictates of ignorant and superstitious...um...persons--THAT's where I have to draw the line.
They quote that one line from Leviticus and tell me that it means that homosexuality is an abomination to God, but they ignore the passage that puts shellfish in the same catagory, using the exact same word, no less. I don't see Rev Phelps out picketing Red Lobster. I don't see crab fishermen being attacked for plying their evil trade. Actually--the Bible was MORE clear on the subject of shellfish than it was in its ambiguous phasing about "man lying with man". And why are lesbians picked on...neither one of a lesbian couple is a man. ;)
Seriously though--people can believe what they want or need to, but they CANNOT force me to live by rules that I can only view as ignorant and backward (on some cases) because it's part of a book that I consider to be no less mythological than stories about the Greek or Egyptian gods. What if they insisted we do ALL the things listed in the Bible--burnt offerings, murdering adulterers in the street, etc? Lovely world.
By the way: "I don't see Rev Phelps out picketing Red Lobster."
Unfortunately, I have seen other people doing this. When I saw them, I had a hard time figuring out if they were being serious or satirical.
Win!
I always thought Serendipity put it remarkably well in "Dogma". She basically said that it doesn't matter what you have faith in. What's important is that you *have* faith.
"I want to show my awe and reverence for the beauty of life and the universe. I want to show that you don't HAVE to worship forces that are greater than yourself to APPRECIATE and respect them."
for years i have followed an "animistic" and shamanic view. (after being a fundamentalist fucktard) There was an old passage i heard in church that God was in Everything. this sparked something. the fact that many people on my dads side of the family followed some Native American Traditions helped to make it more concrete. the Event that shaped my removal from the Church really gave it life. the many experiences and such that have forged my life til now Learning about the Tao and Shamanism from all over the world past and present, learning about the old tibetian concept of Brahma (versus the more modern Hindu version of him) All of it brought me to where i am now. which is that Everything is Brahma and Brahma is everything and the only thing Brahma wants is to experience everything and that Brahma is in everything. Once i was asked by a fundy much later after i had left the church why i prayed to plants and animals as gods. They could not understand that my silent acts of respect were not holding them up as gods but simply respecting them and asking for their guidance or thanking them for letting me take part of them (in the case of plants) They went on and on about what would i do if i lost my Medicine pouch and could not understand the response of make a new one and be a bit upset at the loss of the last one. Of course i know why they had such troubles since i was one. we were taught that the Heathens worshiped everything as gods and that they were indeed worshiping the devil for everything undesirable in the fundy world view is demonic or of the devil.
For me knowing that everything comes from the same place (big bang and the story of Brahma's creation are very very similar including that the old stories speak of things happening in billions of years) kinda means i should respect it. and when i seem to be "praying" to it like it is a God it is only that i am talking to it as another divinely inhabited thing just like you or me or this internet.
but unfortunately even those who never were part of the Judeochritian faiths are still tainted by them and think that god means all powerful when that is a recent invention of mankind. and so they do not understand that divinity is in everything
Oh and that Online ordination thing. if you go through Universalist Life Church do not use the monastery version as they are not recognized and are indeed a fucked up little group. find the site for the main church in Modesto California. they are the real church and it is a very real ordination. i know i have one. and i recently preformed a wedding. Also remember that there are a lot more faiths in the world than just Christianity Muslims and Jews. and if you go looking please do not be pushed away by flakes. every faith has them. and they are no better than the flakes in the big three
*Hugs!*
The other thing is that most religious texts are immediately relevant to when they were written. A quick read through the Quran shows that it's really intended for people living in the urbanized environment of Mohammed's time; things like the Revelation of St. John is very specifically about junk going on at the time. The Pentateuch, and Leviticus especially, really gets slammed for a batch of stuff that makes no sense now, but which isn't a bad guide to surviving as a Bronze Age nomad. History rolls along, though, and what makes this stuff big is that you can interpret and reinterpret it in the present; the good news is that this is vital for any religion, the bad news is that not all those re-interpretations are always nice, as per the above...
... which connects up to the great OH NOES GAY! thing.
There's exactly one line in Leviticus which says that lying with a man as with a woman is an abomination. I actually interpret that as being very specifically about anal sex, something the contemporary Egyptians found horrifying (they were cool with being Gay; they just weren't cool with anal sex), and which sort of makes sense for a culture running low on bathwater and condoms, but that's not quite so valid here and now. Ranks right up there with eating shrimp, or rules for how to be fair to slaves, as stuff which really doesn't mean much now. It's one line; heck, Leviticus devotes more time to telling you what varieties of vultures you can't eat. By comparison, the Old Testament goes on about how one needs to treat outsiders well - 36 times to be precise. I'd say the Old Testament has "be nice to Queers" as more of a focus than "don't be Gay."
Which gets back to the first point, really. You've got the same document which religious rightwingers quote as why being Gay is bad, and here I'm quoting it as why being Gay isn't bad at all! This stuff is like Shakespeare, you can use it to say anything really. And that's just the recent stuff, like the Old and New Testaments, and the Quran - I'm not even talking about the really old stuff, like the Bhagavad-Gita or the Dhammapada!
But the specific passages in the Bible that make their vague and arguable judgments about homosexuals are part of the book that is horribly dated and almost entirely irrelevant to society today. (I mostly don't eat ANY kinds of vultures, myself.)
I really don't want to destroy anyone's deeply held, sincere beliefs. And just because I don't believe any more doesn't mean there isn't the possibility that there could be SOME truth to it somewhere... That's why I have to call myself an agnostic--because I'm NOT arrogant enough to believe I have all the answers either.
I'm glad that you have such liberal Christian views. *HUGS!*
How knows, maybe one day, you might believe again. But God will always believe in you. *hugs ya right back*