FA+
Shop
The Amazing Supertastic Cub Porn Debate
19 years ago
General
Lots of drama in FA this weekend, well, more drama than usual anyways.
Anywho, just to give this item a little startup:
"
What we do NOT allow:
Depictions of sexually immature characters in any sexual situation are not permitted on Fur Affinity
We define 'sexually immature' as:
Clearly underdeveloped sexual characteristics for the species being represented, either by comparison to other characters in the depiction, or other 'well known' characters. This definition has a 'narrow focus', meaning we will accept any reasonable explanation to exclude a character from this definition.
And 'sexual situation' as:
Character is portraying any kind of sexual behaviour. Character is being protrayed in a provacative manner, such as their sexual characteristics being presented to the viewer, or any object in the drawing. Any other character in the drawing is displaying sexual behaviour, such as erections or sexual actions. This definition has a 'wide focus', meaning we will accept any reasonable explanation to include a situation in this definition. "
Frankly, I don't see the debate. I don't see why there's a debate to begin with. This was in the ToS, has been ever since I first signed up here. The admins could have enforced this AT ANY TIME. They decided to be nice about it and give the community a collective heads-up.
Cue the Whinotron 3000 and the Drama-matic 23X.
Cue the recent poll that didn't even have to be made.
Bloody hell. It's like whinging about not being able to post furry porn on DeviantArt. It was in the bloody ToS, but all of a sudden just because there are numbers we should just roll over?
I've avoided stepping into this mess for a while, but honestly, it's getting old. I won't leave if the ToS is changed to allow it (I won't like it and it'll make me stick to my favored sections even more stridently, But I won't leave), but THIS SHIT IS GETTING OLD.
Anyone who wants to rant and rave at me gets to wait until tomorrow for a response. Go-go gadget working! (6-11PM tonight, then 7/8-12 tomorrow. YAY D:< )
Anywho, just to give this item a little startup:
"
What we do NOT allow:
Depictions of sexually immature characters in any sexual situation are not permitted on Fur Affinity
We define 'sexually immature' as:
Clearly underdeveloped sexual characteristics for the species being represented, either by comparison to other characters in the depiction, or other 'well known' characters. This definition has a 'narrow focus', meaning we will accept any reasonable explanation to exclude a character from this definition.
And 'sexual situation' as:
Character is portraying any kind of sexual behaviour. Character is being protrayed in a provacative manner, such as their sexual characteristics being presented to the viewer, or any object in the drawing. Any other character in the drawing is displaying sexual behaviour, such as erections or sexual actions. This definition has a 'wide focus', meaning we will accept any reasonable explanation to include a situation in this definition. "
Frankly, I don't see the debate. I don't see why there's a debate to begin with. This was in the ToS, has been ever since I first signed up here. The admins could have enforced this AT ANY TIME. They decided to be nice about it and give the community a collective heads-up.
Cue the Whinotron 3000 and the Drama-matic 23X.
Cue the recent poll that didn't even have to be made.
Bloody hell. It's like whinging about not being able to post furry porn on DeviantArt. It was in the bloody ToS, but all of a sudden just because there are numbers we should just roll over?
I've avoided stepping into this mess for a while, but honestly, it's getting old. I won't leave if the ToS is changed to allow it (I won't like it and it'll make me stick to my favored sections even more stridently, But I won't leave), but THIS SHIT IS GETTING OLD.
Anyone who wants to rant and rave at me gets to wait until tomorrow for a response. Go-go gadget working! (6-11PM tonight, then 7/8-12 tomorrow. YAY D:< )
