FA+
Shop
See you in Dog Hell, you bland, insipid bastard.
12 years ago
The opinions expressed underneath are simply opinions and are not to be taken as unilateral consensus. That said, I will probably be speaking a bit strongly. Sorry if I offend anyone.
For some reason, I see a lot of artwork depicting Brian (the late dog character from FOX's Family Guy sitcom). I don't understand this.
Brian is not a particularly attractive character. He's not a smart or admirable character. He only existed to serve as Seth MacFarlane's political mouthpiece. Even as far as a character ascribing to the furry fandom goes, Brian is unremarkable. The bulk of his sexual comedy is that he's a dog with canine characteristics (can't stand up in moving vans, but can somehow perform a whole musical number on a freight train), and that he tries to score with bimbos in spite of being a dog.
There's a reason why Brian was the poster child for TV Tropes's 'Dethroning Moment of Suck: Western Animation: Family Guy' subpage - Because he's a generally unlikable character who exists only as MacFarlane's raging opinion-boner. And he had two glorious minutes of getting the shit verbally beaten out of him.
He's a stocky, unattractive, unfit, moronic entity whose only remotely positive merit is his elocution. That is not something I would tap. In spite of my fetishistic oddities, I do not find it a sensible thing to make any erotic investment for.
Seth MacFarlane is an intelligent, witty, charming man, and his voice is hot. Family Guy is a show I will turn over to if there's not really anything else on. But holy shit, why Brian? He's about as interesting as an unpainted fence-post. That would be like sexually showcasing the Claptrap from Borderlands, or Hans Moleman from The Simpsons. Why not pick an attractive male furry character? Like Crash Bandicoot?
For some reason, I see a lot of artwork depicting Brian (the late dog character from FOX's Family Guy sitcom). I don't understand this.
Brian is not a particularly attractive character. He's not a smart or admirable character. He only existed to serve as Seth MacFarlane's political mouthpiece. Even as far as a character ascribing to the furry fandom goes, Brian is unremarkable. The bulk of his sexual comedy is that he's a dog with canine characteristics (can't stand up in moving vans, but can somehow perform a whole musical number on a freight train), and that he tries to score with bimbos in spite of being a dog.
There's a reason why Brian was the poster child for TV Tropes's 'Dethroning Moment of Suck: Western Animation: Family Guy' subpage - Because he's a generally unlikable character who exists only as MacFarlane's raging opinion-boner. And he had two glorious minutes of getting the shit verbally beaten out of him.
He's a stocky, unattractive, unfit, moronic entity whose only remotely positive merit is his elocution. That is not something I would tap. In spite of my fetishistic oddities, I do not find it a sensible thing to make any erotic investment for.
Seth MacFarlane is an intelligent, witty, charming man, and his voice is hot. Family Guy is a show I will turn over to if there's not really anything else on. But holy shit, why Brian? He's about as interesting as an unpainted fence-post. That would be like sexually showcasing the Claptrap from Borderlands, or Hans Moleman from The Simpsons. Why not pick an attractive male furry character? Like Crash Bandicoot?
