Thanks, no I have to read it to understand what you're talking about.

I wouldn't recommend it anyway, it's just something I needed to vent about.

Dared click the link, did not read, but I think I see why. Humans+MLP is always, ALWAYS a NO-NO.

(Doubt it's as bad as Canterlot Wedding though)

Actually, comparing it to Canterlot Wedding isn't that much of a stretch. I'll have to go into detail later why I consider it such an abomination. Normally I wouldn't care and would forget about it, but for some inexplicable reason, it's a popular aspect of the fandom which pops up on EQD periodically, that's even getting an audiobook release.

1. It was on EQD? Guess it's a good thing I stopped going there.

2. Audiobook!!?? FUCK!!

I agree in the way Equestria Girls is presented. I don't hate it but also don't like it. I guess I like the G1 approach. If human protagonists, then they are normal humans, no equivalents of ponies. But they weren't the focus anyways. But still ponies had humans as antagonists, those were the witches, which were kinda well designed. But I don't think they would fit in a G4 environment anyways.

The way most Bronies were constructing human civilisation was the adventure time approach. A long lost era of human civilisations with relics from the ancient past. Well, it works in adventure time. But it doesn't work in MLP in my opinion, so yeah, humans + G4 MLP doesn't seem to fit very well in my opinion. At least I haven't seen a combination that sat well with me yet.

Ugh, that thing. Exhibit A of why I read "featured on EQD" as "do not read this".