Troubling question
10 years ago
I am really confused on what I should do.
What does someone do when one has really damning evidence against another person but is not allowed to speak/tell due to the laws of the websites that both parties belong to? Even though the first person thinks for the sake of other people that other people should know.
Thank you for your input everyone.
What does someone do when one has really damning evidence against another person but is not allowed to speak/tell due to the laws of the websites that both parties belong to? Even though the first person thinks for the sake of other people that other people should know.
Thank you for your input everyone.
FA+

If you want, note the website and I'll try and find it for you.
My name is not on that page anymore, I haven't been an admin here in the last two years. But anyone on that page should be able to help you out.
I guess in alot ways just got hope for the best and hope other's see it for them self before anything else happen's.
But beside that could say make Journal of AB with out names and say if ppl really want know who it is could have them note u. ive see alot ppl do that.
One goes to a 3rd party and publishes the information, artist beware would be the usual place concerning most things on places like FA and DA but you can always make a blog with the information and link here or make a google doc or chart containing information that you want to warn people for, none of these as far as the known AUP of FA goes breaks any rule.
Edit: Just read all the comments. Pretty much the same things I said LOL
I can tell you the full story through skype if you would like.