It's really subjective.

If you are in a crowd of artists who aren't furry they'll think yer furry

if you are in a crowd of furries they might think your a fantasy atist

but I wouldn't worry to much about lables

Yeah, I guess you're right.

The question is, what do you consider yourself?
I've asked myself the same thing.
to answer myself, probably not, when I walk out of my computer room here at home I'm no longer Mapper but some adverage Joe. Only a rare few who live close enough know of my fasination with anthromorphics.
I have been at a couple cons and thats the only other time I'm known as Mapper outside my house.
My hats off to those who do go out and make it known who they are and bare the taunting and ridicule of those with narrow vision and mindedness

I consider myself a fantasy or anthromorphic artist over furry.

I think i went askew of the question sorry nyquil kicking in.

I agree with you and kudos to people who, I'd say, "came out of closet" as furry.

Well, lesse... as a denizen of FA who actually draws and submits the odd piece of smut, you've pretty much defined yourself as a furry artist (though not necessarily a furry). I think the only FA residents who get out of that classification are the ones who never draw anything and just lurk or write.

I'd postulate that in contrast to what TheBurningDonut said, in fact the opposite is true. When your art is in multiple genres, you as an artist are defined by the company you keep. Here at a furry art community should you submit a mixture of furry and non-furry art, most will assume that you are a furry artist (if with varying interests), while if you submitted the same mixture to a more general gallery such as dA, the assumption wouldn't be there, and you'd be seen as a fantasy artist who draws the occasional fur.

Interesting point. So do you consider Brent Booth as furry artist too?

Brett Booth? It's been a while since I've seen his work around... I personally don't consider him anything specific beyond an artist, but the les-scrupulous majority fo the fandom probably does consider him a furry artist. He's an artist, he's drawn anthropomorphic creatures, and his art is popular in furry art circles - what more do they need to call him one?

So a writer who writes fury subject mater and submits would not qualify as a furry?

No, I think they're called journalist. Lol, j/k

Read Jeanette and tell me what you think.
1. Furry
2. Nerd
3. Non Furry
4. Not your thing
5. What no Sex?
6. Gag I could not read it for it burned the eyes out of my head.

A simple numerical answer will do.