Your Weasyl account- Could I have your opinion?
10 years ago
Has anyone found that they get very little input on their Weasyl accounts?
Maybe It's because I don't use mine as often, but I don't know!
I'm just wondering what kind of input people usually see from Weasyl? If you seem to get decent pageviews or comments or favorites or anything comparative to your pageviews.
The thing is, I am wondering if it's mostly that the artists went there but not a lot of other furries moved there, so it's mostly just artists posting up art and not as many people viewing other peoples' art? I am thinking this because I know that Weasyl has a higher traffic ranking than SF, but I get substantially less feedback from people on Weasyl than from SF.
I could be completely wrong and if so I am just trying to figure out what the deal is kind of. Let me know what your experience has been? :)
Maybe It's because I don't use mine as often, but I don't know!
I'm just wondering what kind of input people usually see from Weasyl? If you seem to get decent pageviews or comments or favorites or anything comparative to your pageviews.
The thing is, I am wondering if it's mostly that the artists went there but not a lot of other furries moved there, so it's mostly just artists posting up art and not as many people viewing other peoples' art? I am thinking this because I know that Weasyl has a higher traffic ranking than SF, but I get substantially less feedback from people on Weasyl than from SF.
I could be completely wrong and if so I am just trying to figure out what the deal is kind of. Let me know what your experience has been? :)
I think Weasyl started off as a site that was extremely artist-centric, and had some policies that didn't encourage its use by non-artists. It's since corrected those policies, but it missed it's window of opportunity to supplant FA as the premier furry site.
As a writer and watcher, I've always gotten the best feedback and response to my writing and comments on others' submissions on SF. I think SF has a number of unique features that encourage participation and finding new content creators.
The recommended viewing feature SF has is really great. The key is to tag the crap out of your submissions, because it's all based on similar tags. I put every applicable tag I can think of on my submissions, and I create a few unique ones, such as tagging all of my submissions with Lycanthris, and the names of my characters in them. Everyday I get new faves/votes/comments on SF, because the tags on my submissions correlate with other submissions for the recommended viewing.
Two things I will give to Weasyl; not just folders, but sub-folders for your galleries, and the ability to upload PDFs that will display on the webpage.
On another note, FA compresses the crap out of my art, it looks sooo much nastier here than when I post it to SF and Weasyl. I'm still looking for a site that has a good not-out-of-the-way and well formatted comissions information tab also. FA's is crud but I'm still using it. Weasyl might have that. I think SFs might have been kind of weird.
I also tag all my stuff with my FA name and my main character's name usually. Not sure if it does anything but for some reason that seems like a good idea. TAG ALL THE THINGS.
I agree, probably still a good idea to post there- can't help but feel strangely let down when people are posting up such lovely stuff on the front page but never talk to anyone though! I guess they might be in the same boat as us though.
I don't get much attention on Weasyl other than comments and favs by my usual regulars, but I have 300 ish watchers there now and a good amount of submissions, though I mostly just like having a backup gallery.
I suspect at least for me, my lower interactions on FA are due to my audience on Weasyl being 1/10th what it is here, or perhaps even less. FA, it varies. I see some folks with less watchers get ten times the comment on a pencil piece.