POLL: High res art
9 years ago
General
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ

โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โผ โณ โผ Commission Queue โ Commission Prices โ Commission ToS โ Patreon โ SubcribeStar โผ โณ โผ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฑโน โฝ โ
โพ โนโฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
1. When you commission an artist, do you expect a high res version of the art, or is the FA size acceptable?
2. What pixel size do you consider to be the typical "high res" size?
3. What's the smallest size you'll accept as "high res" for my quality of art?
Thank you in advance :)
2. What pixel size do you consider to be the typical "high res" size?
3. What's the smallest size you'll accept as "high res" for my quality of art?
Thank you in advance :)
FA+





2. I say anything over 3000px is high res.
3. For yours, I'd probably say 3000px too.
As for sizes..idk I'm not good with sizes o.o
As for the rest? I'm not quite certain to be honest.
2. What pixel size do you consider to be the typical "high res" size? 3000px long side
3. What's the smallest size you'll accept as "high res" for my quality of art? 2500px long side
For the sizes themselves I found that a common agreement is on 'as big as you worked'. At least when it comes to digital stuff. Downsizing is always possible. Upsizing not so much.
For high rez it depends on the artist, but generally anything over 2k pX on the long edge is what I consider high rez.
If the artist worked in a lower resolution, then I'm happy with that file, but if the artist worked in high resolution, then that's the file I expect to receive privately.
-Always, to me there's no point commissioning small files since they can't be printed out or used as a wallpaper. Unless it's a really small and cheap pic like an icon.
2. What pixel size do you consider to be the typical "high res" size?
-3000px to 5000px
3. What's the smallest size you'll accept as "high res" for my quality of art?
-Depends on the contents of the drawing, for a typical pinup I'd say 2000px on shortest side.
2: Just whatever size the artist worked on it as, really. If the artist works at a low resolution (Rare, but some do) then it's all good; it is what it is.
3: I can't really say for sure on this, to be honest. I admittedly feel a little cheated if I'm given a high-resolution that's smaller than the actual resolution of the image. (I'm weird like that, I know...) Technically anything that's larger than the web-version could be considered "High resolution", but my general preference is to have the highest resolution available.
I feel like I'm acting like an entitled shit putting it all this way... >-> But it's honestly kinda how I feel about it... I've paid a lot of money on commissions in the past, and just kinda feel like it's only fair to get full access to the image (non-commercially, of course) for what I've paid.
2. Normaly what was made by the artist before it gets compressed for other sources , normaly 1200X upwards .
3. This one really depends on the theme of the picture , take a macro picture with lots of small stuff and you would expect a rather big picture . On character pictures i would only expect something around 1200 .
2. Depends on the commission type. Something small like an icon 500x500 and up is usually good, but a full illustration should probably be 2000x2000 and up (generally). No idea what artists usually work with, but maybe the ''working'' res (res of the image when it's being created) should be the given high res?
3. I don't think one's art quality really changes what high res should be. See 2.