What is your opinion on this?
9 years ago
If you pay for art work from someone, you should be allowed to post it regardless of what transpires after that between you and that artist. I just had some pics taken down that I paid for awhile back and had them removed although that artist did originally give me permission but later reported that art and had it removed. I think thats a dick move and very wrong and petty to take it out on someone later, just because things are not going good between these those two people, even though its been over a few years already. To hold a grudge like that is just petty, unprofessional and stupid.
What do the rest of you have to say about this?
I also placed in a ticket to complain on this person since they did originally give me permission to post those comics after I paid for them. But due to the fact I don't have that saved document showing they gave me permission, I have no proof. But things should be considered and done differently concerning art that is purchased by other users here at fa. If you buy something, and you ask the artist permission to post it in your own gallery, once permission is given, thats a agreement struck and it should stand as is regardless of what that artist saids after wards. Its fair that way since that person paid for the art work.Its unfair to have it removed after that just because they want to get back at you for whatever reason. If that artist doesn't want you to post their work, then prior arrangements should be made stating as such, and not after the fact just because things went south between you and that person. Or am I the only one who thinks this? I won't reveal the artists name, but that's still petty, especially since that was art work done over two years ago nd before our fall out, I did have permission to post it. I understand this person may still have a grudge against me, but since then I have had no contact with them and I only wish to post what I had paid for and what was originally agreed upon. I had no idea this person would or could be this petty and still holds a vengeful childish grudge.
What do the rest of you have to say about this?
I also placed in a ticket to complain on this person since they did originally give me permission to post those comics after I paid for them. But due to the fact I don't have that saved document showing they gave me permission, I have no proof. But things should be considered and done differently concerning art that is purchased by other users here at fa. If you buy something, and you ask the artist permission to post it in your own gallery, once permission is given, thats a agreement struck and it should stand as is regardless of what that artist saids after wards. Its fair that way since that person paid for the art work.Its unfair to have it removed after that just because they want to get back at you for whatever reason. If that artist doesn't want you to post their work, then prior arrangements should be made stating as such, and not after the fact just because things went south between you and that person. Or am I the only one who thinks this? I won't reveal the artists name, but that's still petty, especially since that was art work done over two years ago nd before our fall out, I did have permission to post it. I understand this person may still have a grudge against me, but since then I have had no contact with them and I only wish to post what I had paid for and what was originally agreed upon. I had no idea this person would or could be this petty and still holds a vengeful childish grudge.
How did you pay this person? If you have proof of purchase, then you have evidence enough to show that you bought *something* from this artist, and if you attest that you purchased the rights for personal display of this artwork, and they disagree, then you can challenge them to advise you what exactly it was you bought from them with that payment.
If you'd ever like some artwork done by an artist who strives to act professionally, send me a note! /plug.